was that (easy game mechanics aside) it felt like a post apocalyptic game. The world is F'ed, most everything is ruins that are being fought over like ants fighting over some left over picnic food. New Vegas came of more like a Post-post apocalyptic game, New vegas was mostly spared from the nukes, the desert is a desert with life and plants etc. The NCR has helped re-establish real society. The capital wasteland is a wasteland in comparison. the only real towns look like they are barely getting by like Megaton and Rivet city. Now why is it 200+ years later they are still in such a crap state while other parts of America are doing better? well that was poorly explained but it did give you that sense of "emerging from the end of the world" that was missing from NV. It makes me wonder how FO4 will work? if we keep moving foward in time its natuarl to assume things wil continue to get better for society, will that eliminate that "just hanging on" feeling that the original Fallout and FO3 had.