Dove said:
Or the FN PS-90. Depends on what the requirements and terrain are.
euhm, the PS-90 is the semi-auto civilian plinker... the P90 is the automatic PDW.
Dove said:
/edit: Let me add a couple things about the HK 416. It was just released in 7.62x51 called the 417. So I might go with that. Depending on department guidelines.
go with 6.5mm Grendel & get the best of both worlds (it's better than 6.8mm SPC), but i guess you want to stick to standard ammo types (5.56mm & 7.62mm NATO)
Muff said:
Dove I like your choice of the HK416, Why would you not chose something like a M14 or AR15?
the entire idea behind the HK 416/417 program is to make a more reliable AR15. so yeah, it's a hell of a lot better than the standard M4 or M16.
it does away with the craptic direct gas system the normal M4/M16's use (the weakest part of the system).
Dove said:
Muff said:
Dove I like your choice of the HK416, Why would you not chose something like a M14 or AR15?
It's an AR-15/M4 manufactured by H/K. So I don't know how to answer that.
yeah, because an M2 browning is the same as an M3M, right? sjeezes man, if you want to talk about buying guns at least get informed...
Dove said:
And why do you dislike shotgun's?
I just don't like them. A good rifle shooter is a lot better in many ways more than an expert shotgun shooter.
and somehow you utterly fail to recognise that the role of a shotgun is not the same as a rifle? dude, i'm sincerely starting to doubt you ever had any firearms training...
Dove said:
And I call shenanigans on anyone who thinks the SCAR is a good rifle. Too heavy, the mechanics are too complicated for a battle rifle. Add the fact that it looks disgusting and you have one hell of a lemon.
alright, let's dissect this piece by piece:
- "not a good rifle": it is one of the most reliable rifles produced in the last 25 years. it shoots as accurate as any compareable weapon with the same barrel length. the ergonomics and ease of use is superior to the HK 416, a case in point would be the way you fire the M203, mount the M203, strip the gun or use spare parts.
(i'd also like to add that you can flip the ejection port and charging handle from left to right & vice versa with a minimal of spare parts. a dream for lefties, try that with your goddamn AR)
- "too heavy": as said, 3.5kg with 14.5" barrel for a 5.56mm, 3.5kg for the SCAR-L (also 5.56mm)
- "too complicated": why yes! i see why you'd say that since it is a dream to fieldstrip and was designed for that very purpose (it is designed for SOCOM afterall). various mounts such as an M203 launcher is even easier to mount than on the HK variants. the 3 chamberings (SCAR-L in 5.56mm NATO, SCAR-H in 7.62mm NATO and 7.62mm Russian) have a whooping 90% parts compability/interchangeability (break one, get spare parts from the other).
- "looks disgusting": who the fuck cares about how it looks? i'd argue that functionality and performance is what counts. and if you're whining about the color, the color is chosen because it is a perfect paint base for all environments... it's not meant to see combat like this, unless in the desert perhaps.
anyway, the SCAR shouldnt be compared to the HK416 anyway. the 416 is a general purpose rifle, while the SCAR is designed for Spec Ops. the requirements are different.