As do you apparently.SuAside said:isn't it funny that you declare instant superiority, yet don't actually say anything useful to refute my claims?
It's not a full length rifle, and? You're not catching it. A patrol rifle is something that has longer range and more penetration than a pistol. Designations really have no bearing.a PDW is not a rifle... a PDW is closer to an SMG than to a rifle. so please stop calling it a patrol rifle?
Dove said:Shotguns aren't as useful as they once were for my line of work. Their useful range is actually getting to be shorter than a pistol's. Beyond pistol range, obviously a rifle would be necessary. I could write pages and pages of arguments, but I feel they would fall on deaf ears, so I'll sum it up to one sentence. Shotguns are for people that aren't confident in their abilities to hit a target with one projectile.
really, such a claim is moronic... if you really are cop / ex-military, you should be ashamed. if you really want to go SWAT, that's even a bigger shame on you.
Let me elaborate. ALMOST ALL AMERICAN POLICE DEPARTMENTS HAVE GOTTEN RID OF SHOTGUNS DUE TO COLLATERAL DAMAGE, AND GENERAL INNEFECTIVENESS except for less than lethal deployment.Dove said:Shotguns aren't as useful as they once were for my line of work. Their useful range is actually getting to be shorter than a pistol's. Beyond pistol range, obviously a rifle would be necessary. I could write pages and pages of arguments, but I feel they would fall on deaf ears, so I'll sum it up to one sentence. Shotguns are for people that aren't confident in their abilities to hit a target with one projectile.
You aren't catching anything I've written already, would be kind of pointless.so please do write your pages of arguments...
I didn't get that for the H/K. That's the low end of the weight scale for the myriad of AR-15 rifles. Any one of the thousands available would more than serve it's purpose. Have been for many many years.where did you get that 2.27kg claim for the HK416 in 10.5 inch? 3.31 kg with 10.5" barrel is what i can dig up.
A shorter barrel has more relevance than you obviously know. A shorter barrel unequivocally relates to less accuracy. Any shooter knows this, why don't you?and shorter barrel? not very relevant in this case, kid...
This is me not giving a shit. I already know what models and barrel lengths are going to be available.Barrel lengths of the Mk 16 (SCAR-L) will be manufactured in three different lengths: 253 millimeter (9.96 inch) = CQB, 351 millimeter (13.82 inch) = standard, and 457 millimeter (18 inch) = long.
Barrel lengths of the Mk 17 (SCAR-H) will be manufactured in three different lengths: 330 millimeter (13 inch), 400 millimeter (15.75 inch) and 500 millimeters (19.68 inch).
Yawn. Yeah, I know...for HK 416's that is 267 mm (10.5 in), 368 mm (14.5 in), 419 mm (16.5 in), 508 mm (20 in).
I was comparing 10.5 inch barreled M-4 versus 9.96 inch SCAR. Barrel is shorter on SCAR meaning less accurate, yet the SCAR is longer in total lenght, meaning less useful in a tight confrontation. It was also heavier. Still in reference of 10.5 M-4 vs. 9.96 SCAR.so a terribly useful claim you make about barrel length...
This I also know. Which is why, depending on the possible situations, I would go for the 417 for the larger and heavier round. The 5.56 NATO round is fairly unreliable for stopping power. (so don't use that argument, I already know, and have experienced it)oh and to boot, the weight of the SCAR-H and HK417 is pretty much identical (3.87kg with the 13 inch / 12 inch barrel respectively).
Well. Good for you. Using internet sources only for arguments. Have you ever actually used a weapon for other than target shooting? Then you would know that weight, length, accuracy, and ease of maintenance are more important than "european stuff is uber cooler than US stuff".anyway, reported weight varies a lot depending on the source. hell, defense update even reports 3.08kg empty for the 13 inch SCAR-L, but i find that rather unlikely.
Dove said:Buy a left handed AR-15 if you want brass to eject left. The charging handle has always been ambi.
...is an invalid argument since doing so brings down a logistics nightmare to any large organisation.
Umm. Large organizations don't give a shit about individual concerns, just lowest bidder. Which means you get what's cheaper to manufacture. Besides, since you didn't read what I wrote I'll explain. YOU buy a left handed AR-15. They don't give me anything, I buy it, just like almost every department in the country. Of course they pay me extra for uniforms and protective gear, so it doesn't come out of pocket.
Dove said:BTW. The H/K 416 (selective fire, not semi only) has already seen service in the field, both line and spec ops. The SCAR hasn't.
To who? As far as I can tell, they're in testing. When were the first AR-15/M-16's delivered?euhm, 1000 production model SCAR's were delivered in january... so scratch that claim.