The Joker is Incel Cismale Trash.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 53669
  • Start date Start date
The squealing SJWs will be horrified at knowledge the film was a great success. Joaquin Phoenix winning a best lead actor award will be the cherry on the cake.

 
A couple of hours later:



The movie just became even more awesome to me because despite assholes like you torrenting it, it made $1 billion. Was it in amazing 480p or glorious 720p?

I didn't pay attention. I'm not much of a resolution whore.
 
"We're not planning to make a sequel, because on its own, this film manages to tell a story that both - wait, hold on a second - WHAAAAAAAAAAAA$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$SEQUEL IS COMING UP BITCHE$$$$$$$$$$$$SSSSSS"
 
"We're not planning to make a sequel, because on its own, this film manages to tell a story that both - wait, hold on a second - WHAAAAAAAAAAAA$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$SEQUEL IS COMING UP BITCHE$$$$$$$$$$$$SSSSSS"
 
I don't think I like this. I think it's a baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaad idea. And apparently it's official. Stupid move. I just hope Joaquin is NOT coming back. He doesn't like sequels. I think this was actually something he demanded before shooting Joker: no sequels. But it's a money thing, innit?

I haven't watched the film yet, but if a sequel focused purely on the human condition and avoided the superhero nonsense, something The Dark Knight almost got right, then maybe it could be a worthy successor. The reason why the Joker was always the best villain was because he was the most flawed and relatable. Heath Ledger's joker was excellent, while Christian Bale's Batman was worthless.
 
I haven't watched the film yet, but if a sequel focused purely on the human condition and avoided the superhero nonsense.
Dude... :lmao: That's what "Joker" does. That's why it's so good: there's no superhero nonsense.
 
Back
Top