The most hated family in america

Metzer said:
well i dont know if you guys have this law in america but in britain we have a law that prevents sign etc like that being shown. not the GOD HATES FAGS but the ones that say FAGS SHOULD DIE etc in england that would be called encitement to murder and you would be arested for it and charged in a court of law. if america has a law like that then this family should have been arrested a long time ago. there sick fucks and i dispise there belifes in every way.
free speech & all that jazz.

Metzer said:
also the church leader actually seesm to be a real dumb fuck any time he is asked a question he dosnt know the answer to he gets angry and tells the interviewer to go away. what a smuck.
well, have you never talked to someone that you know wouldn't understand?

we ourselves often give up talking to moronic console kiddies and tell them to get lost, since we've explained it all time after time already and we're getting tired of it because they arent educated in the subject anyway.

let ye who is without sin cast the first stone, Metzer ;)

not that i'm defending the asshat, but your reasoning is flawed.
 
Smoke_Jaguar said:
I don't want to go Paladin Solo on you, but don't you think all of us have only ONE God?


Nope, i know people that worship no gods, and i know people that worship many.

So, no, I dont think all of us have only one god.
 
Smoke_Jaguar said:
I don't want to go Paladin Solo on you, but don't you think all of us have only ONE God?

Elissar said:
Nope, i know people that worship no gods, and i know people that worship many.


I meant we have only one true God. Not how many you worship. It's...philosophical...
 
Metzer said:
well i dont know if you guys have this law in america but in britain we have a law that prevents sign etc like that being shown. *snip* .
Now, I hate to repeat myself, but do I have to share a country with this gentleman?
Firstly, please speak (or type, if you are in the mood to be a pedant) English. I don't demand, nor supply, a perfect standard of English, but you could at least make some effort.
Secondly, and I realise this is much the same as my first point, please attempt to use some punctuation in the correct place, it does make for much easier reading, chum.

Now, I'm not entirely in disagreement, these people appear to be a bunch of arseholes, but to suggest that the worls legally mandates against them is, erm, somewhat over the top.

Smoke_Jaguar said:
Smoke_Jaguar said:
I don't want to go Paladin Solo on you, but don't you think all of us have only ONE God?
Elissar said:
Nope, i know people that worship no gods, and i know people that worship many.
I meant we have only one true God. Not how many you worship. It's...philosophical...
Could you please explain this philosophy? Other that it's philosophic nature.

I myself follow no God or gods, and I don;t think I'm alone here.
 
I assume Smoke Jaguar is trying to 'cleverly' allude to the 'fact' that every man serves himself.
 
It should be illegal to disrupt the peace at a funeral, much more at a soldier's funeral.

Smoke, you're a dipshit. All people have their own philosophies, what ever made you think we all held the same beliefs? The word "philosophy" itself holds no special meaning, it just means something is an idea one holds as some sort of guide. Besides which, I'm guessing you had to look up the word "philosophical" in the wiktionary.
 
Stag said:
It should be illegal to disrupt the peace at a funeral, much more at a soldier's funeral.

Very true.

Stag said:
Smoke, you're a dipshit

You want me to bite in this puny attempt at a flame war? Forget it.

Stag said:
All people have their own philosophies, what ever made you think we all held the same beliefs? The word "philosophy" itself holds no special meaning, it just means something is an idea one holds as some sort of guide.

I entirely agree with you, every single man lives and dies by his own sword. We all have diffrent beleifs, true, true.

But please, try to understand what I'm saying, you atheist fucks, that I beleive, we have only one true God.

If you're such a beleiver in the many philosophies people have, you obviously defend what I stated earlier, and except for your stupid insults, we are on the same page. [/i]
 
Smoke_Jaguar said:
But please, try to understand what I'm saying, you atheist fucks, that I beleive, we have only one true God.
Smoke_Jaguar said:
I meant we have only one true God. Not how many you worship. It's...philosophical...
These two statements do not entirely correlate.

Also, please note the difference between Atheism (Denying the existence of any God or gods) and Agnosticism (Neither believing or disbelieving in any God or gods).
 
Smoke_Jaguar said:
I beleive Faith is much more important than "religion" could ever be, but the fact that you, as an atheist, not only do not beleive in God, but actually beleive in nothing, disturbs me.

Big T said:
Also, please note the difference between Atheism (Denying the existence of any God or gods)

I wrote that on page two, I know the words which I speak, and I read before I post, too. Don't analyse everything I say, without saying something yourself.
 
No, smoke, you monotheistic fuck, what you said was not stating a personal opinion. What you said was speaking for all of humanity. Admit that what you wrote was overbroad, and poorly phrased, and then we'll be on the same page.
 
Smoke_Jaguar said:
Big T said:
Also, please note the difference between Atheism (Denying the existence of any God or gods)
I wrote that on page two, I know the words which I speak, and I read before I post, too. Don't analyse everything I say, without saying something yourself.
I fear you misunderstand me, or have failed to analyse that which I have written.
I said:
I myself follow no God or gods, and I don;t think I'm alone here.
Please note that I do not deny the existence of God and/or gods. I do not believe in "nothing" I just don't believe in anything.

I never met any evangelist convincing enough and was not molested with religion whilst growing up.
 
I know what you talk about. Is the condescending really neccessary? I think not. I know where you're coming from, you're like...an atheist that says "convince me". The only conviction you should look after is that which lies in yourself. You will find what you seek, friend.

Although, common sense and good old fashion logic can't give you reason, although I understand what you are trying to say. "Agnostic". Those old schools were nothing of the sort, you have to beleive something to search so much as they did.

But:

Big T said:
I do not believe in "nothing" I just don't believe in anything.


Logic class 101.

One doesn't belive in anything.

One belives in nothing.

-

One that doesn't belive in anything, belives in nothing.
 
What are you talking about, Smoke? He believes in no particular thing, not nothing.
 
Yes, english is my first language, I am an American.

Let us break down the words:

any thing. I do not believe in any thing. Any being used to describe a particular thing.

Nothing. No. Thing. No thing at all.
 
any - O.E. ænig "any, anyone," lit. "one-y," from P.Gmc. *ainagas (cf. O.S. enig, O.N. einigr, O.Fris. enich, Du. enig, Ger. einig). Thr -y may have dim. force here. Any old is from 1896. Combinations anywise, anyone, anything date back to O.E.

no - "negative reply," c.1225, from O.E. na (adv.) "never, no," from ne "not, no" + a "ever," from P.Gmc. *ne (cf. O.N., O.Fris., O.H.G. ne, Goth. ni "not"), from PIE base *ne- "no, not" (see un-). Second element from PIE *aiw- "vital force, life, long life, eternity" (see aye (2)). As an adj. meaning "not any" (c.1200) it is reduced from O.E. nan (see none), the final -n omitted first before consonants and then altogether.

thing - O.E. þing "meeting, assembly," later "entity, being, matter" (subject of deliberation in an assembly), also "act, deed, event, material object, body, being," from P.Gmc. *thengan "appointed time" (cf. O.Fris. thing "assembly, council, suit, matter, thing," M.Du. dinc "court-day, suit, plea, concern, affair, thing," Du. ding "thing," O.H.G. ding "public assembly for judgment and business, lawsuit," Ger. ding "affair, matter, thing," O.N. þing "public assembly"). Some suggest an ultimate connection to PIE root *ten- "stretch," perhaps on notion of "stretch of time for a meeting or assembly." For sense evolution, cf. Fr. chose, Sp. cosa "thing," from L. causa "judicial process, lawsuit, case;" L. res "affair, thing," also "case at law, cause." Old sense is preserved in second element of hustings and in Icelandic Althing, the nation's general assembly.
 
And where are you from? The UAE? Uganda? Peru? Please inform us who believe in no gods nor the lack thereof....

Or of course you could just be another asshole trolling these forums trying to elicit a response from your mental superiors.

But you could always prove me wrong...
 
Back
Top