Maybe you have, well most probably yeah. But, let us not pretend like ANYONE of us here would be some kind of pro when it comes to taxing and politics. Making a sound 'tax system' is AT THE VERY LEAST as difficult like making a proper health care system - and we curently see how much the republicans understand from it ...
Without all the 'Jobe Plebe' USA-Is-a-special-snow-flake-and-it-can't-be-done-like-in-Europe talk here, let us make at least ONE THING clear, so that we at least speak the same language.
It is in principle possible many nations like Norway, Sweden, Finnland, Germany, France, Spain, etc. have proven that it can be done, and that even for generations, without ruining the state hell even a couple of well relatively 'poor' states have a better welfare and health care system than the USA, but that just by the way. Ok, ok USA is USA it's not Sweden etc. but we are NOT even talking on that level right now, it is just about the PRINCIPLE behind it. I hope we can at the very least agree on that one.
Now, as I said I am really not a pro when it comes to taxes, but I know that it is a bit more than just like a "household" with your typical income and expenses, because when it comes to nations, they work a tiny little bit different than that. See you can make plans and financial decisions that go over several generations, you can cut deficits, you can have different tax systems for different people and incomes, like the more you earn the more you pay, different professions would have to pay different amounts or buisness that fuck the environment a lot maybe get taxed a lot and so on and so forth. And let us not forget that nations can actually decide to print their own money, in other words inflation. But that just all on the basics, not sure if I got everything right now, but I think we all get the picture, nations are somewhat ... pretty complex.
Now, on the case of Bernie, I think that I have heard also somewhere that he had the idea to increase or create new taxes on financial transactions, Wall Street and Banks, maybe even something like a
financial transaction tax, which should have been like done AGES AGO(!). And yes, probably many households with GOOD(!) income, would had to pay more taxes, but oh the horror! Laywers making like 200 000 a year would have to pay more in to the system, I am crying tears.
At the very least, Bernies ideas had more behind it than either Trumps - as we can see now, or even Hillaries.
I think you can look at it from a different angle too.
Almost everything can be quantified and I am pretty sure someone has done it here as well I just don't know where to find accurate numbers right now, but that's not the point anyway.
What I mean is, you can take for example the amount of taxes people pay, and say we increase those at least on higher incomes so that we reach a higher social stability, like less poor, more welfare, more support etc. this leads to less civil unrest and more stability in the population, in Germany we call this also the Onion-model like where you have a very huge middle class making for a relatively stabile society, because people can at least buy shit now, like paying for their aparment and all that even if they do end up without a job, their health care is still covered and so on and so forth.
But well you might have heard about the
Hoover Index after all.
Now you can look how much this would 'cost' the people on average and look at how much everyone would have
actually to pay from their income, if the taxes would be lower without all those government programs in place. I mean a less stabile society leads to more riots, theft and all the stuff and people would have to either protect themself or their property now, like as many do with the so called 'gated communites', leading maybe to a situation where they pay higher rents, someone to protect the neighborhood, higher rates for their insurance companies as more stuff gets destroyed and stole and so on.
I wouldn't be surprised if those 'rich' people end up actually paying MORE from their money now, simply because a lot of stuff is privatised now and they have to take a lot more precautions, compared to a situation where you had less people in poverty or at least in the lower class.