Courier said:
I can't remember if the movie mentions this or not, but in the book it's explained that the reason Valjean's sentence was so long (19 years) is because he made several escape attempts but kept getting caught, so it wasn't really just breaking parole that made Javert dislike Valjean so much. In his eyes he's a hardcore criminal that deserves to be brought to justice.
Plus he kept Javert from arresting Fantine, which grated with his sense of justice even more, and then managed to successfully escape after confessing he was the real Valjean. I'm pretty sure that up until this point Javert hadn't really been actively searching for Valjean, let alone obsessing over him. He just got pushed over the edge.
That makes sense. The movie contains only song, apart from small comments muttered here and there, so it doesn't delve too deeply into certain topics.
I suspect that it would have discredited Valjeans innocence, in front of cinema audiences, if justifications for his long sentence were provided.
This is something that often irks me with most cinema, that urge to simplify things. People should be trusted more.
I haven't seen the "Kon Tiki" movie, nor do I have much desire to, because I fear it will be simplified to the point of dumb.
I saw a clip from the movie, where Thor Heyerdahl is talking to one of his critics. This is common knowledge for most people interested in Thor's adventures, that many of his community doubted his hypotheses, and pushed him to prove himself - but the movie obviously condenses this: Into one angry, spiteful, unpolite - in other words - one
evil researcher, sneering, laughing and mocking Thor.
The scene REEKS of "He is the bad guy. Get it? And Thor is good. Just wait and see!"