Shoveler said:Motion passed......NEXT!
heh
Threepwood said:Shoveler said:Motion passed......NEXT!
heh
Only by a small margin.
Do you realise this bill also cuts education spending? That it cuts EMA grants?
Anyway, have you also seen any footage from London tonight? It's more or less a battle zone, mounted police have been charging in, and flares are being shot across against police lines.
Shoveler said:Threepwood said:Shoveler said:Motion passed......NEXT!
heh
Only by a small margin.
Do you realise this bill also cuts education spending? That it cuts EMA grants?
Anyway, have you also seen any footage from London tonight? It's more or less a battle zone, mounted police have been charging in, and flares are being shot across against police lines.
Yea I saw, and dude I can appreciate why people are pissed. I just don't think the rioting is going to help much, your government's got its mind made up that they're going to slash spending on everything. Hopefully the violence will simmer down in the next couple of days/weeks.
When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.
That, or it's largely irrelevant to US citizens.mobucks said:Thomas Jefferson wrote:
When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.
Why haven't I seen a newscast on this? Because the powers that be that control US media know that they don't want their sheep aware that a people still exist that would go to these lengths to fight the government.
Hah, rioting.mobucks said:rioting in the streets of london would be considered newsworthy anywhere in the (non-third) world 50-100 years ago.
mobucks said:Thomas Jefferson wrote:
When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.
Why haven't I seen a newscast on this? Because the powers that be that control US media know that they don't want their sheep aware that a people still exist that would go to these lengths to fight the government.
Blakut said:How come studies can be free in some countries? Like Denmark or whatever, and cost so much money in the States and UK? It can't be SO much better there, can it?
Your argument that the 100k loan was acceptable was that people would be graduating and getting 200-250k jobs. That is extremely rare. You also assume that people can find a job in their field that pays well shortly after graduation. That is a pipe dream.Shoveler said:The insecurity is addressed with the first payment of the loan being delayed till well after you graduate. Yes it's a lot of responsibility, but at this point if you are choosing this kind of high end education, you probably wouldn't be flunking out of school, or realizing early on this isn't for you and not racking up that kind of debt.
It takes many students 10-20 years to pay off their college loans, that's hardly affordable.Shoveler said:Most people don't rack up anywhere near this much debt, it was an off the cuff example. Would he not use his education ever? Not likely. I'm not talking about repaying loans instantly within the first year of graduating, I'm talking long haul (The average is the first payment is due 6 months after graduation). It is worth it.
Facilities are usually paid for in grants where the university matches what a private donor donates in a grant. Equipment is commonly donated or funded in a similar way.TheWesDude said:with state mandated tuition costs, that removes the ability of colleges and universities to pay top wages for top professors and facilities.
there wont be any "elite" schools because they wont be able to pay for the full equipment for computer labs, biology labs, chemistry labs, physics labs, and all the other stuff colleges and universities do.
Actually a lot of university professors at US universities are shitty instructors for this very reason, they are there to be researchers and are contractually obligated to teach. Many have grad students teach, which is even worse.Sander said:Actually, this is not true on several levels. First of all, top-level researchers are not the same as top-level educators. Second of all, in terms of education-level (not research-level) European universities are absolutely at the top - without private funding and trying to attract the top researchers.
Because most american's don't really give a fuck about education and Wikileaks is a much more sensational news story for 24/7 networks to cover.mobucks said:Why haven't I seen a newscast on this?
Well, free (or mostly free) education would mean socialism, which is almost communism which is obviously a crime against Gods will!Blakut said:How come studies can be free in some countries? Like Denmark or whatever, and cost so much money in the States and UK? It can't be SO much better there, can it?
These aren't widespread, highly problematic riots that are the precursor to a civil war or anything. They're student protests. No more, no less.mobucks said:It's not what you learned, its where you learned it.
And my bad, I figured mounted cavalry charges into protesters was a form of riot control. Silly me.
Because it's not actually free, but the studies are paid for through taxes. It's a political decision to have the state pay for education.Blakut said:How come studies can be free in some countries? Like Denmark or whatever, and cost so much money in the States and UK? It can't be SO much better there, can it?
Threepwood said:@ Sander, last night the 'student protests' officially turned into riots:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PRKcPZt61SQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QEGyvDGcI1E
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aAgssbMubi8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=70iSH7pby-I
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j4HsUn0opMU
I could go on.
No deaths, just minor injuries and some destruction of property. It's a riot, I guess, but not a particularly serious one.Threepwood said:@ Sander, last night the 'student protests' officially turned into riots:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PRKcPZt61SQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QEGyvDGcI1E
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aAgssbMubi8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=70iSH7pby-I
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j4HsUn0opMU
I could go on.
Edit: the videos should be watched in thier entiretey, as many seem to spend half the time giving context and 'build up'.
Plus, the idea that the media are keeping everyone in the dark is retarded as both the Wall Street Journal and New York Times featured this on their front page. It's being covered by the news outlets for whose target audience this is relevant. It's hardly being covered by FOX because it's not relevant for their viewers.
That's still not a sign that the masses of citiziens are against that.
UncannyGarlic said:Your argument that the 100k loan was acceptable was that people would be graduating and getting 200-250k jobs. That is extremely rare. You also assume that people can find a job in their field that pays well shortly after graduation. That is a pipe dream.
Uh, that is NORMAL. I'd rather pay back a loan for 10 years than pay 20% more in taxes for the rest of my life. To me, THAT is unaffordable.UncannyGarlic said:It takes many students 10-20 years to pay off their college loans, that's hardly affordable.