Unpopular Opinion and Discussion thread

Is this poll pointless?


  • Total voters
    125
It's not like the Falklands populations have posed some kind of threat - or that the islands are of exceptional strategic significance - so much so as to become a vital geopolitical factor for Argentina or any other such tangible issue.

The civilian population of the islands is 2500, the military population is 1300. The place is nothing but a British military base. The civilians live only in one of the islands with only very few in the other major one, the archipelago consisting of 200. The claim also include the Georgias and South Sandwich, both of which are not populated. But it doesn't end there, the claim includes all surrounding sea territory and sea shelf and all of its resources, wich is nearly the size of half Argentina. It provides a strategic control over the only way large ships that don't fit in the Panama Canal, such as aircraft carriers can travel between Atlantic to Pacific oceans, and it has been said by the British themselves it is a vital position for control over South America should they need to intervene geopolitically. The islands population is the British population and the British armed forces, they are not a separate entity on themselves, and the threat comes from the United Kingdom itself and its armed forces which are vastly superior to those of many South American countries and pose threat to the entire continent. And we've all seen what the UK and its allies (let's call it NATO) did in the Middle East and during the Cold War in places like Vietnam when they didn't liked local govenrments, literally obliterating smaller nations.

Yup, I think that's plenty threat.
 
Last edited:
*Falkland stuff*
*Falkland stuff*
89HANHg.gif


Here we go again ...
 
OKC was justified

OKC was a false flag attack. He had help.
911 was a false flag attack. They let it happen and blamed other people.
No country for old fags.

Also... about Pariah Dog.

images
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Here we go again ...

No need to. I said my piece, and Gonzalez responded by pointing to a factor I had overlooked. A completely fair exchange of views.

Internet debates turn into pissing contests, and we tend to treat each others as if we are the ones who can act upon the information given. I'm not particularily enthusiastic about seal-clubbing in Norway, but say that I was, and you were against. Let's say you finally end up convincing me that seal-clubbing is wrong. Let's say we've rambled on in one of those 350-page threads, and finally, FINALLY, FINALLY there was something as unheard of as Debate Victory.
Then what?
I'm that person right now, I am against seal clubbing. What can I do? I don't buy seal fur coats. I'm hungry. I think I'm going for tacos today. That's the extent of the efficiency on my part.

Unpopular opinion: Internet debates are mostly about ego-stroking and verbal performances for the gallery. Now and then I do get properly triggered though, like the drug-debate some time ago. I think it's worse when your opponent *doesn't understand* your point of view, or misconstrues what you are trying to say. You'll go crazy trying to remedy it. But *convincing* someone who fully understands you - but outright disagree? That's next to impossible, and a huge waste of effort.
 
Bah not far enough!

All hail
Sir Cliffedge Cutlord, hate of women, troll of internet forums, lover of dogs (too much me thinks!).

I don't actually hate women. I'm just realistic about them, which tends to result in a strong distrust of women.

As for my "love of dogs", well, I did fuck your mother repeatedly.

Sometimes I have to at least pretend I'm working.

Do they pretend to pay you, too?
 
I don't actually hate women. I'm just realistic about them

Yes, yes all the salty tears and stuff does not imply a hate for women who obviously don't want to touch you.
As for my "love of dogs", well, I did fuck your mother repeatedly.

Uh huh, well first off your psychology bill (and this will probably be huge, hope you have a job, but by the way you act on here I highly doubt you have the social skills to procure a job), second proves you "love dogs", third Highly doubt it as with your huge hate I am betting you are incel, or you know go back to number 2.
 
Yes, yes all the salty tears and stuff does not imply a hate for women who obviously don't want to touch you.


"Salty tears and stuff". Lol, k.

Uh huh, well first off your psychology bill (and this will probably be huge, hope you have a job, but by the way you act on here I highly doubt you have the social skills to procure a job), second proves you "love dogs", third Highly doubt it as with your huge hate I am betting you are incel, or you know go back to number 2.

Something something asserted without evidence, dismissed without evidence

Not impressed.

Nah, they pay me real money.

Joke's on them, I suppose.
 
Back
Top