US presidential elections thread

Who do you want to be POTUS?

  • Donald Trump

    Votes: 6 18.8%
  • Ted Cruz

    Votes: 2 6.3%
  • John Kasich

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Hillary Clinton

    Votes: 1 3.1%
  • Bernie Sanders

    Votes: 23 71.9%

  • Total voters
    32
Where the Hell is my Vermin Supreme vote? He's the best one running by a country mile.

Vermin+supreme+front+page+sweet+thanks+evrypony_fbc861_3153913.jpg
Isn't that the guy from Hogwarts? What's his name Dumbledore or Hagrit? He fought Voldemord, he's the best choice in my opinion.
 
Some needs to do a Vermin Supreme fallout playthrough and upload that stat, assuming were using New Vegas Ultimate edition what would his Special/Traits and Perks be ?
 
Another curious thing is, no matter who wins, Russia wins too.

If it's Trump, he's advocating a reasonable relationship with Russia, which is of course good for them.
If it's Hillary, they can blackmail her since they almost certainly have evidence that she compromised national security.
If it's Bernie, he's going to drive America into the ground, which would mean less competition for them.

Devious Russkies are devious.
 
Maybe Trump will be best buddies with Putin. Then again, maybe he won't be. What guarantees do we have of his actions?

Right now he's all "he started it!" about some nasty twitter stuff with Ted Cruz, a fellow republican. What's the guarantee he won't do that while having access to nukes?
 
Regarding that, Ted did start that one.
trump_3599957a-large_trans++qVzuuqpFlyLIwiB6NTmJwfSVWeZ_vEN7c6bHu2jJnT8.jpg

Even though one might think this to be a pro-Trump ad, it appears that it isn't so in Utah. Trump's tweets came after this.

What guarantees do we have? None. But what guarantees do we have for any other candidate? Hillary is a career politician with a history of corruption, and is facing a possible indictment for compromising national security. Despite his rhetoric, Bernie has supported the bombing of Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Iraq, and so on.

So far, Trump is the only candidate giving Putin any praise at all for his campaign against ISIS. Even Bush managed to maintain a decent relationship with Putin, and I think Trump has proven to be far more competent in comparison.
 
Yeah sure, but will he follow through on his campaign promise to reinstitute the Tree Of Woe as a method of capital punishment? Can we really expect his Wheel of Pain to come through as a viable source of alternative, renewable energy? You have to give the man credit, his human stew orgies may possibly solve both the problem of overpopulation and famine in one move. That's pragmatic policy we need. I think the optics of the reptilian transformation thing won't play well in certain demographics like the heartland though.
 
Last edited:
Maybe Trump will be best buddies with Putin. Then again, maybe he won't be. What guarantees do we have of his actions?

Right now he's all "he started it!" about some nasty twitter stuff with Ted Cruz, a fellow republican. What's the guarantee he won't do that while having access to nukes?
Both Trump and Putin have publicly talked about their mutual repspect for eachother and Trump has said he wants better relations with Russia and Putin has said he would welcome this.

Right now he's all "he started it!" about some nasty twitter stuff with Ted Cruz, a fellow republican. What's the guarantee he won't do that while having access to nukes?
Based on this I'm going to assume you have very little to no idea about the situation or the political climate of the Republican party at all.
 
About Trump possibly using nukes in the Middle East or even in Europe. Consider me not convinced of Trump.



Also he recently said something about punishing women for having an abortion. Just nutty, and that's just in the last 24 hours.
 
Last edited:
About Trump possibly using nukes in the Middle East or even in Europe. Consider me not convinced of Trump.


Reporter: Do you plan to use nukes in Europe?
Trump: No, I don't think so. But only a shitty negotiator takes his cards off the table.
MutantScalper: Trump possibly using nukes in Europe.

As for the middle east, if the Islamic State goes even remotely nuclear, I don't think anyone would mind a mushroom cloud over Al-Raqqa.
Also he recently said something about punishing women for having an abortion. Just nutty, and that's just in the last 24 hours.

He intends to punish people for breaking the law? What an absolute barbarian.
 
He intends to punish people for breaking the law? What an absolute barbarian.
He plans on punishing the women who have the abortions, not the doctors who perform them; even the pro-life people have called him out and said that that's not what the movement's about.
 
He plans on punishing the women who have the abortions, not the doctors who perform them; even the pro-life people have called him out and said that that's not what the movement's about.
So the woman could go and willingly break the law without any fear of repercussions? What's the point of such a law?
 
Last edited:
The point of anti-abortion laws is to prevent the death of gestating fetuses, not punish women who attempt to exercise the right of not giving birth. Do you realise what you're advocating? One of the stupidest, archaic forms of abortion policy ever.
 
The point of anti-abortion laws is to prevent the death of gestating fetuses, not punish women who attempt to exercise the right of not giving birth. Do you realise what you're advocating? One of the stupidest, archaic forms of abortion policy ever.
And the point of anti-theft laws isn't to punish the thief, but to prevent the theft of property. Punishing the thief is a disciplinary measure. Punishing the doctors but not the women would be like thieves being completely inculpable, but the fences getting arrested anyway.

Why should women be able to willingly break the law and get away with it?
 
Back
Top