0wing
Все умрут, а я волномут
On which terms? Compared to shovelware?but it is still a good game
On which terms? Compared to shovelware?but it is still a good game
"Fallout NV isn't a true Fallout game because it isn't about surving the post-apocalypse."
People for some inane reason think 'post apocolypse' means 'people eating dirt and shitting themselves to death alone and crying'.
The more likely scenario, as depicted in Fallout 1-2 is 'People rebuilding and trying to not eat dirt and shit themselves to death'.
I agree completely. Fallout 3 and 4 seem more '20 years after the appcalypse' to me.
20 years after the bombs drop, people are already wearing leather retarded raider suits and hanging poeple for no reason?
Fallout 3 is more 'what if radiation caused severe brain damage, and nothing else', scenerio.
Raider armor does make zero sense.
'I'll walk around shirtless and my body will deflect shotgun shells!'
If you are arguing that anything not found in Fallout 1/Fallout 2 is not canon, you are arguing against Obsidian (the people who made Fallout) and Bethesda (the people who own Fallout). Besides that, you are basically invalidating the entire concept of sequels in Fiction.
This. Is what I've adopted as my mindset when dealing with canons and lore. If someone who owns the IP didn't care about canons, lore, and consistency (aka Pete "not interested in discussing how realistic things are in an alternate universe post-apoc game w/ talking mutants and ghouls." Hines), then why should I?But if they don't give a shit about the lore and none of the original creators were involved, why should i?
Shouldn't this be fucking obvious?
Emil did a pretty good job with oblivion. Especially its side and guild quests. Honestly I don't know WTF happened because ever since fo3...Pete can choke on Emil's member as far as I'm concerned. He's a grade A dip shit that's good at marketing (a product which sells itself already), and should not comment on anything related to the lore.
But muh atmosphere!People for some inane reason think 'post apocolypse' means 'people eating dirt and shitting themselves to death alone and crying'.
The more likely scenario, as depicted in Fallout 1-2 is 'People rebuilding and trying to not eat dirt and shit themselves to death'.
To me, Fallout is dead. Even if Bethesda is somehow gone and the rights of the IP is handed over to the original team, people's expectations of the series has changed to totally different direction. Nothing short of time travel can save the series. It is better that people make their own series instead of hoping for a sequel.Ultimately whoever owns it, has final say, sadly.
But fuck Bethesda, they can't write for shit nowadays.
I personally hear loads of bethesda fans decry Fallout 1-2 simply due to their graphics and turnbased gameplay.
IMO, even today, Fallout 1-2 looks quite nice, at least in some areas, the animations and sprites are better than indie retrogarbage.
Books usually takes less people to make. I read "And Another Thing"; while I don't hate it, I do think of it as basically fanfic. Honestly, I liked the radioplay's ending better even if Douglas Adams was already dead by then. I guess you could give someone the credit for the series but then you risk the George Lucas syndrome.No one would think that way about books though. If i bought the rights to oliver twist and wrote a "sequel" where i messed up the backstory, no one would treat this new backstory as "cannon". In fact, they would probably mock me. Because books are mainly considered art. But games are basically considered to be products so it's totally cool, right? Kid in the fridge is now how ghouls work and if you don't like it you're nostalgic. It's ridiculous honestly.
Camp searchlight, camp guardian, sierra madre, the divide, vault 22, vault 11, nipton, anywhere in the mojave with the radio off...But muh atmosphere!
Emil did a pretty good job with oblivion. Especially its side and guild quests. Honestly I don't know WTF happened because ever since fo3...