What's Trump up to now?

Whatever Vergil.
Do you check for Vergil under your bed?

If you guys want to see what someone who is actually as bad as how the media portrays Donald Trump, try searching "Rodrigo Duterte". One thing that affected me personally (I just wanted to share something happen recently to me.) is his poorly executed porn ban. It just happen one day and disappeared. It was weird that I could still access those sites using other devices.
blocked1.png
 
So you expect some random edgy shitposter to work in the White House.
Despite the fact that I made a silly joke, but this could be also seen as one way to describe Steve O Bannon. I mean he was the guy behind Breitbart after all.
 
Maybe time for you to start posting some gay anime again since you obviously can't stay on topic?
Maybe you should stop acting like everyone that disagrees with you is some kind of sentient shitposting A.I..

If you guys hates the polarization of the political system, maybe you guys should try adopting a ranked voting system? However, that is never going to happen because the winners aren't going to change the rules of a game that they won. Eventually a pendulum would stop swinging but does the analogy stretches that far?
 
No shit, how much real estate does that guy still occupy in your heads?

If you guys hates the polarization of the political system
Well the problem is the other side's opinions are morally bankrupt, catastrophic and would result in the excruciating deaths of kitties and grammies across the multiverse. Whereas my opinions are clearly superior in virtue, of the highest moral fibre, and would create a world where rainbows shoot out of everyone's ass. Now I'm going to post a demagogic sermon of condescending, sanctimonious rhetoric with some youtube clips by a funny celebrity to convince you. Because this is where shit gets solved.
 
Despite the fact that I made a silly joke, but this could be also seen as one way to describe Steve O Bannon. I mean he was the guy behind Breitbart after all.
Honestly, I wouldn't be surprised if Vergil was actually Milo.

I mean, how many gay alt-righters who like to say outrageous things for shock value do you reckon there are in the world?
Holy Fuck, a magic duel to decide the fate of the presidency. Sign me the fuck up.

I'll start getting my candles and ritual knives ready.
 
In the past I liked their chanel, but now I really hate TYT since their mental brake down after the ellection and this stupid chick working for them with heir shitty attitude, but I can't help it I think Chenk would make a decent comedian.
 
In the past I liked their chanel, but now I really hate TYT since their mental brake down after the ellection and this stupid chick working for them with heir shitty attitude, but I can't help it I think Chenk would make a decent comedian.

I haven't followed them that much, I guess their heart's in the right place, but they are quiiiite emotionally invested in their journalistic reports, so much so, I'd consider them video blogs rather than journalism.
That said in the most objective way possible.
I get that it should be allowed to publish emotional and angry news reports, but if you do, they count as just opinion pieces/blogs.
 
TYT's main enemy seems to be corporate democrats. Cenk is trying to get money out of US politics, not a bad goal, with his Wolf PAC, Justice Democrats, etc. They have actually broken actual news like about Hillary getting the election questions beforehand. The real problem in US are the mainstream news pundits who make 30 k buck / day and basically never do any actual journalism and are just softballing Trump.
 
I haven't followed them that much, I guess their heart's in the right place, but they are quiiiite emotionally invested in their journalistic reports, so much so, I'd consider them video blogs rather than journalism.
That said in the most objective way possible.
I get that it should be allowed to publish emotional and angry news reports, but if you do, they count as just opinion pieces/blogs.
Journalism? At TYT? Don't be ridiculous. Entertaining, informative maybe. But they are not journalists in my opinion, most of the time they just cite other REAL journalists as sources, like the New York times or what ever and just give their OPINION on the matter, not actually investigating something. And I am a leftist by the way. But one has to be clear that TYT is nothing more but a propaganda chanel. I mean that's ok, many media and news agencies today act like that ... but TYT is not even in the same ballpark like serious journalism.
 
In the past I liked their chanel, but now I really hate TYT since their mental brake down after the ellection and this stupid chick working for them with heir shitty attitude, but I can't help it I think Chenk would make a decent comedian.
TYT has been awful for a very long time longer than that.
TYT's main enemy seems to be corporate democrats. Cenk is trying to get money out of US politics, not a bad goal, with his Wolf PAC, Justice Democrats, etc. They have actually broken actual news like about Hillary getting the election questions beforehand. The real problem in US are the mainstream news pundits who make 30 k buck / day and basically never do any actual journalism and are just softballing Trump.
Partnering with Al Jazeera was such a moral decision. Also, "softballing Trump"? Do actually think that is the problem and not them spraying bullets around instead taking aim. If that was softballing what do you call it when Obama was in office.
Trump selling yanks browsing info to big corporations. Seems even Reddit's Trump-fans are all weepy about the whole thing. Where my NMA-Trump fans? Where y'all at?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/trump-online-privacy-poll_us_58e295e7e4b0f4a923b0d94a

Honestly, I think Trump is a punishment, not for electing Trump but for the political climate as a whole. Refusal to condemn BLM and even support of it shows that media elites prefer reporting from their ivory towers.

I notice something. I keep stopping myself from citing anything because I know it would devolve into an argument of the validity of the source. I could cite a verse in the Quran that proves that Islam condones violence and someone can cite a verse that proves that Islam is peaceful. Using that logic would mean that both cancel each other out being from the same source but there would an argument of the validity of the translation. I can't read Arabic so I have to trust the translation. Then comes the accusations. I have to go into the fringes to find people willing to condemn BLM (I don't mean comments that is easy enough). Yet people can claim stupid things like "Most of America is openly racist!" without proof. People shouldn't pat themselves on back for being able to make the world a better place; if and only if, everyone does whatever they say. Democracy doesn't work that way in fact even Dictatorships don't work that way in practice. Let me ask you if you can get rid of racism by activating a device that erases everyone's memories, would you? Does the ends justify the means? Does the bloodshed in the past make this okay?
 
Refusal to condemn BLM? So far I only see wide spread missrepresentation of what the movement even is, specially from the most mainstream sources and the loudest people online. Are you this much of a tool?

The biggest problem I see in the entire world's political climate is that everybody has devolved into an emotional baboon who exclusively think in reactionary anger at everything. Social media has finally poisoned the real world.
 
Refusal to condemn BLM? So far I only see wide spread missrepresentation of what the movement even is, specially from the most mainstream sources and the loudest people online. Are you this much of a tool?
What misrepresentation? Are those riots just false flags? What can be attributed to BLM? Does everyone in BLM have to be merged into a giant blob of flesh to be held accountable to anything? And please don't bring up Fox News, the sole dissent that has already been thoroughly discredited in a sea of so called competitors. It is getting really hard to not believe in the idea of a controlled opposition.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top