What's Trump up to now?

Well, this is one of the questions that have to considered in the future. What will nations with ties to the US think about the new policy? Nations like Poland for example, as you can't really say that they are friends with Russia, or Ukraine for that matter. Geting closer to Russia, will certainly cause issues with them. Not that I personaly mind, I think we should always talk with Russia at eye level on matters that directly concern Russia, and we should of course criticise them for their mistakes. But I just don't see Trump as the correct person to do that, if the ellection and his personality are the benchmark here. Even if he's a very succesfull business man, that doesn't mean that he has to be a great statesman. But only the future can tell us that. His term, hasn't even really kicked in yet.
 
Ahem, anyway this makes me glad that thanks to Trump Russia can rise up again, at the expense of other nations.
Ruskies are facing HIV epidemy according to Vadim Pokrovsky from Federal AIDS Center. There are 270 new patients with HIV diagnosed and 60-70 people dying due to AIDS in Russia every day. Hopefully they'll run out of manpower pretty soon, I doubt Trump can change it:
http://classic.newsru.com/russia/10nov2016/skvo_print.html
 
They lost 30 milion people in WW2. It looks more likely that HIV will run out against the Russians ...
25 million, estimates vary due to the chaotic nature of the war and the shitshow that was the early Soviet Union.

Ruskies are facing HIV epidemy according to Vadim Pokrovsky from Federal AIDS Center. There are 270 new patients with HIV diagnosed and 60-70 people dying due to AIDS in Russia every day. Hopefully they'll run out of manpower pretty soon, I doubt Trump can change it:
http://classic.newsru.com/russia/10nov2016/skvo_print.html
I knew we should have stayed communist...
 
I think cheap vodka is another big problem in Russia, or well, alcoholism. That it's a real epidemic. I think the average lifespan for men is pretty low there. You can buy a large bottle of vodka from a Russian 'vodka kiosk' for 3 - 4 euros.

Edit. Ok I checked the price for a half a litre bottle of vodka in Russia is 2,70 $. So even cheaper then I thought. Man that's crazy cheap.
 
I think cheap vodka is another big problem in Russia, or well, alcoholism. That it's a real epidemic. I think the average lifespan for men is pretty low there. You can buy a large bottle of vodka from a Russian 'vodka kiosk' for 3 - 4 euros.

Edit. Ok I checked the price for a half a litre bottle of vodka in Russia is 2,70 $. So even cheaper then I thought. Man that's crazy cheap.
Yeah, Russians take their alcohol... seriously I guess. Keeps the average guy happy.
 
I think cheap vodka is another big problem in Russia, or well, alcoholism. That it's a real epidemic. I think the average lifespan for men is pretty low there. You can buy a large bottle of vodka from a Russian 'vodka kiosk' for 3 - 4 euros.

Edit. Ok I checked the price for a half a litre bottle of vodka in Russia is 2,70 $. So even cheaper then I thought. Man that's crazy cheap.

Didn't the State want to regulate that, since Vodka being so cheap translates into rampant alcoholism? And that with their low birthrate, Russians need all the help they can get keeping their population afloat and healthy. But I'm not living there so what do I know.
 
Ruskies are facing HIV epidemy according to Vadim Pokrovsky from Federal AIDS Center. There are 270 new patients with HIV diagnosed and 60-70 people dying due to AIDS in Russia every day. Hopefully they'll run out of manpower pretty soon, I doubt Trump can change it:
http://classic.newsru.com/russia/10nov2016/skvo_print.html

Random factoid: George W. Bush for all of his faults was one of the great enemies of HIV and AIDs. That and his work in Israel/Palestine is why I can't ever hate on him completely.
 
Random factoid: George W. Bush for all of his faults was one of the great enemies of HIV and AIDs. That and his work in Israel/Palestine is why I can't ever hate on him completely.

He had to pay back black Africans after the yellow cake - uranium lie. He also screwed over Colin Powell badly.

I can easily hate him, Cheney, etc. completely.
 
No Child Left Behind...did
Campaigned on immigration reform...built The FenceTM

We could be here all day.

Cut taxes for the rich and made a mess of them, messed up Katrina, messed up Iraq, messed up Afghanistan (oh yes he did), created and messed up the financial crisis that started 2008, was instrumental in the creation of the unstability in the Middle East/North Africa/Asia and the creation of ISIS, singlehandedly destoyed the reputation of USA around the world, etc.

Yea let's be here all day.
 
Last edited:
Raised taxes and made a mess of them, messed up Katrina, messed up Iraq, messed up Afghanistan (oh yes he did), created and messed up the financial crisis that started 2008, was instrumental in the creation of the unstability in the Middle East/North Africa/Asia and the creation of ISIS, singlehandedly destoyed the reputation of USA around the world, etc.

Yea let's be here all day.

Katrina is the one which outright CONFUSES me as I genuinely don't get why nothing was done there. If ever there was an easy win, it would be sending money to rebuild a major American city beloved by all for its part in our cultural heritage.
 
Irak confuses me more. I get wanting to go to Afghanistan, but the logic of ''our enemy is Al-Qaeda and Islamic terrorists, let's invade one of the few Arabic countries where the government is their staunch enemy'' never made any lick of sense to me. Didn't back in 2003, still doesn't to this day.

I mean, it wasn't for the oil, Saddam was already distributing the damn thing like anyone else was. It wasn't to get back at Iran, they hated him anyway. And if anyone thinks it was for freedom and democracy, I have a bridge to Baghdad to sell them.

So, freaking why again? Apart maybe from the military-industrial complex maybe wanting to test their new toys and pressuring to find a reason to suck more money out of the US by selling them ever more outrageously expensive and overkilling supertech that ends up rotting in warehouses or bombing the crap out of civilians and low-level grunts. That's the only remotely rational reason I personally see, and it's a damn stupid one.
 
Back when social welfare was cool.
"Our social welfare is so much more than just charity because we do not say to the rich people: Please give something to the poor. Instead we say: ----- people, help yourself! Everyone must help, whether you are rich or poor. Everyone must have the belief that there's always someone in a much worse situation than I am, and this person I want to help as a comrade.

If one should say: Yes, but do I have to sacrifice a lot? That is the glory of giving! When you sacrifice for your community, then you can walk with your held up high."
Try guess who said this before you look it up on the internet. Honestly, if only this rhetoric existed nowadays.
 
Last edited:
Irak confuses me more. I get wanting to go to Afghanistan, but the logic of ''our enemy is Al-Qaeda and Islamic terrorists, let's invade one of the few Arabic countries where the government is their staunch enemy'' never made any lick of sense to me. Didn't back in 2003, still doesn't to this day.

I mean, it wasn't for the oil, Saddam was already distributing the damn thing like anyone else was. It wasn't to get back at Iran, they hated him anyway. And if anyone thinks it was for freedom and democracy, I have a bridge to Baghdad to sell them.

So, freaking why again? Apart maybe from the military-industrial complex maybe wanting to test their new toys and pressuring to find a reason to suck more money out of the US by selling them ever more outrageously expensive and overkilling supertech that ends up rotting in warehouses or bombing the crap out of civilians and low-level grunts. That's the only remotely rational reason I personally see, and it's a damn stupid one.


It's all about controlling the region, oil, money, and private contractors - those contractors had lucrative deals with the presidents cabinet pals. Keeping the region destabilized keeps a new regional power from developing. Plus Bush had to finish daddies war to make him proud. Then we leave all of our equipment over there rotting so they can re-purpose it and eventually use it against us. When I was over there we left ALL of our equipment behind. FYI that included an entire battalion worth of Paladins, HUMVEE's, LMTV's, and much more. So we basically busted ass on vehicles for two years and turned around and left them to rot in the sand.
 
If it is all about controlling the region, then they have sure done a damn fine job, didn't they? Funny how some already say, that under Trump a war with Iran might be a possibility ... oh boy ... if that ever happens ... if people think Irak was a disaster, we havn't seen anything yet.
I don't get it. Neither the US nor Russia for that matter when it comes to the middle east. They look like children, which simply can't stop to touch the hotplate, because it sure won't be as bad like the first 4 or 5 times ... who knows?
 
The Middle East is fertile ground for PMC's and the military industrial complex. Not much to understand really. We were warned about it and it happened anyway. It's more of a reason to spend billions on jets that are obsolete by the time they are finished and then sold to countries that then use them against us. The Middle East is where we get to test our new toys, because they would be at war anyway with or without our intervention. The standard playbook is to overthrow your enemies and supplant them with someone more easily controlled. Doesn't exactly get you friends though. It almost looks like that is what we tried with Turkey seeing as they are the biggest power in the region and they are getting buddy-buddy with the Russians.

Russia is the counter balance to American expansion. They are more directly involved since they are closer to the actual conflicts like Afghanistan. They are intent on allying with countries that oppose American expansion. They are a lot more paranoid as a result...rightfully so I might add. The Georgian invasion was predicted, as well as the Ukrainian conflict. The US makes a lot of enemies by meddling in others affairs. The Russian view of Ukraine is that the US caused an uprising in Kiev that drove out the elected government. The US claims it did not engineer a coup, but it did oppose a corrupt government in Ukraine.

A level beneath this also exists. Russia has survived for hundreds of years because of a buffer protecting them - due to control over the Baltics, Belarus, and particularly Ukraine. Without this buffer they are exposed. To bring Ukraine into NATO is like Russia becoming pals with Mexico. Look at Cuba as an example of how that works out. Relations with them are shit, even when Obama tried to mend the rift. The USA does not fuck around when it comes to our neighbors. We have been mostly safe from invasion since we kicked Mexico's asses a couple hundred years ago, aside from World War 2 of course but even then the majority of the population has been sheltered. That won't be the case forever. I wonder if the war fever will stop when the bombs start dropping over here?

Take current events for instance. Look at some of the spots Obama is visiting in his World Tour. Germany has been a key ally for a reason - they are one of the strongest countries close to Russia. They are right in the middle of the refugee crisis. They are a much easier target for terrorists as well. You know that though. Whereas once immigrants were granted work visas to work, now they are a nuisance. Nationalistic ideologies are opposed to this hence the rise of Trump. If half of the conspiracy theories are true the US is in trouble. Cyber-warfare (interfering with elections) is the kind of thing we would do and now the Russians (and even weaker countries like Iran) are beating us at our own game. It is no secret that the Republicans were immune to this in the latest election.

The Democrats were targeted for obvious reasons. Once you would need a spy on site to do all of this. Now it can be beamed out like magic. The Russians use attacks such as these to make the U.S. seem paranoid, which helps them justify their attacks as self defense. With the Patriot Act in recent years and Edward Snowden even more recently, we have a situation where the government needs to expand it's powers to be more proactive in events such as these, but that opens up a whole new can of worms - should we be more afraid of Big Brother or terrorists?

It's hard to know what to expect from President Elect Trump as far as national security is concerned. Europe isn't too pleased that is for sure. With tensions increased in recent years any wrong move can be catastrophic although neither side wants that. Smaller scale conflicts are preferable. NATO has become just as much a liability as it is an asset now. All of the harping about WW3 may actually come about, but it won't signal the end of the world - just a change in power. New weapons like hypersonic missiles and UAV's will change the face of war forever. Once space has been militarized countries all over the world will be scrambling to kick off their space programs. Cold War 2 coming near you.

The Russians have expanded their influence to Belarus, Bulgaria, and Moldova along with Turkey. It is becoming easier to see why the US is involved with the Middle East so much when Russia is pushing to the south. With Turkey becoming a larger regional power and them allying with Russia we might see a situation where the US is essentially kicked out of the Middle East. Time will tell if we execute another false flag attack or we have a repeat of Pearl Harbor and WW3 kicks off. It's scary and just a little bit exciting I think.

ivlkk7.jpg
 
Back
Top