welsh said:
Isn't this going to kill the console business- new generations of console systems, games that can't run on each other's systems- the more sophisticated the software the more difficult to replicate across systems?
Again, I know diddly about consoles, so could someone explain this?
But if competing consoles did fuck the industry, could that mean a revival for PC games?
Nope, it isn't. It's happened before, with the introduction of the PS2/X-Box/Gamecube, it ins't going to revive the PC, nor is it going to kill console games.
Basically, every few years a new 'round' of console gaming starts: one competitor publishes a new console, and the others have to quickly follow or they will be seen as slow movers. Plus, many players will soon choose for the first published system because:
1) It's new, and hence cool.
2) It has more new games than the consoles published later.
3) It's better than what they had, and the only thing available.
That's a lot of market share.
Besides that, because of the few competitors, the competition is very clear. In PCs this is not so. The evolotion has a lot more stages, videocards, CPUs, soundcards and other components are published with several groups in mind: the budget gamer, the tweaker, the high-end gamer and on and on.
This effectively means that it's a lot cheaper and easier to upgrade a PC than to upgrade a console (purchase a new component vs. purchase a new system).
Basically, the old system won't change, but for the fact that consoles have taken a new step hardware-wise.