Sicknessoverload
Still Mildly Glowing
There's notes explaining they attack caravans for the provisions they hold.
And so I should support a tyrannical, militant, child enslaving occupier since it is on the rise? Would you have said the same to the French in WW2 Arthur? You do not even know if the Legion will last and there is more evidence to point to it not lasting. just like every empire every.I’m not saying the Powder Gangers are the rule of law. At all. I’m saying that the Powder Gangers are a PRIMO FUCKIN STEAK of an example of how the NCR’s justice system failed. What you asked earlier, about it being a pragmatism thing for me? Partially. But it’s also a matter of “one is falling apart, and one is on the rise”. That’s not being simply pragmatic, that’s recognizing that some forms of government just repeat failing history. Rome only failed when it rotted, like America, admittedly. The difference is that Rome took 1000+ years to rot. Both America and the NCR are dying after ~200.
It is strange that you are standing up for the Powder Gangers yet the Legion is a bridge too far. The Powder Gangers are faction full of anarchists and psychopaths that enjoy making the lives of those around them miserable. With the Legion there was a method to their madness and that was to strike fear and doubt into the minds of their enemies. Make them weak and more likely to desert the army.I meant they don't attack you the player on sight. They only attack you if you have something they want, they're not your regular psychotic, bloodthirsty raiders.
Meyers and Lem are an exception to this rule. Meyers was a lawman that got a little too overzealous and just wanted to serve his time and then go on with his life. He wasn't really a Powder Ganger and had nothing to do with them. Lem on the other hand was a petty thief who got caught up in the moment and when the dust cleared realized that he made a mistake and wanted to turn himself over to the NCR and serve out his time. The rest of the Powder Gangers are not like that though. Many, such as Scrambler, are murderers and rapists who even bragged about killing kids. This is why I view the Powder Gangers as "Chaotic Evil". They are selfish psychopaths that only care about themselves and want to make the lives of those they come across miserable. While the Legion I would argue that they are evil but they commit evil actions not for selfish reasons but for the betterment of the wasteland.Well not all of them are murderers and rapists, Meyers is a good example.
Look, he is under 18. I am trying my best to be as gentle as I can with him and not my usual aggressive psycho self. We all were dense when we were that age.Jesus Christ Crni was right. You’re dense.
Also, no notes whatsoever saying they keep the contents of the caravans. They attack caravans to cut off the supply that goes to New Vegas.The Brotherhood of Steel also seems to dislike them due to interfering with patrols near and in Hidden Valley.
Well you encouraged him but sticking up for him when it came to the Legion. Who's fault is that, hmm?Just jumped into the thread is that man really defending the Powder Gangsters
Funny given that my female bounty hunter character is always attacked on sight by those fuckers. Remember how they also wanted you to kill off the town that saved you and helped you recover? Totally not evil...Because, just like real life, not all convicts are rapists and child molesters. They're wrong, but this started because they said that they're mindless raiders and if you read the notes you realize this isn't true. A raider will attack you on sight, a Powder Ganger will only attack you if you have something they want.
No one said they're mindless raiders, you said they weren't this.but this started because they said that they're mindless raiders and if you read the notes you realize this isn't true. A raider will attack you on sight, a Powder Ganger will only attack you if you have something they want.
Which is wrong. They absolutely are psychotic, bloodthirsty raiders. Not mindless, but they are still this.they're not your regular psychotic, bloodthirsty raiders.
Because, just like real life, not all convicts are rapists and child molesters. They're wrong, but this started because they said that they're mindless raiders and if you read the notes you realize this isn't true. A raider will attack you on sight, a Powder Ganger will only attack you if you have something they want.
Reading Polybius, the actual Romans started out like the Legion. So given knowledge of history, yes, I know the Legion will likely last, and yes, I will continue to support “insanity”, as you put it.And so I should support a tyrannical, militant, child enslaving occupier since it is on the rise? Would you have said the same to the French in WW2 Arthur? You do not even know if the Legion will last and there is more evidence to point to it not lasting. just like every empire every.
Supporting insanity just because it is on the rise is a bad way to go, I think.
Which is exclusive to you and not anyone else. A specific situation is not an indication of their character, there's ton of evidence of them attacking people regardless if they want something.Yes exactly, that's the point I've been trying to make.
Reading Polybius, the actual Romans started out like the Legion. So given knowledge of history, yes, I know the Legion will likely last, and yes, I will continue to support “insanity”, as you put it.
EDIT: this thread blew up while I was making dinner. Go live your lives, you weirdos.