Destructoid wonders why Bethesda hasn't announced Fallout 4 yet

It has simply been... too long of a wait brothers. Bethesda, you are without a doubt the last remaining company with the capacity to conjure an authentic roll-playing experience. Fallout 3 is the keystone of the RPG genre. Fallout 4 will raise the bar.
 
Last edited:
It has simply been... too long of a wait brothers. Bethesda, you are without a doubt the last remaining company with the capacity to conjure an authentic roll-playing experience. Fallout 3 is the keystone of the RPG genre. Fallout 4 will raise the bar.

Your presence has been missed. We knew you would return with Fallout 4 on the horizon. We just knew it.
 
It has simply been... too long of a wait brothers. Bethesda, you are without a doubt the last remaining company with the capacity to conjure an authentic roll-playing experience. Fallout 3 is the keystone of the RPG genre. Fallout 4 will raise the bar.

Your presence has been missed. We knew you would return with Fallout 4 on the horizon. We just knew it.

I swear, he is probably the only tolerable Blizz-drone after all. This community would not be the same without him. At this point I think that he is a form of parody. You know, some kind of very inteligent and crazy form of art meant to mock the whole gaming culture and Bethesda with it's presence.
 
And Beth games are just as buggy, but they seem always to get a way with it.

As an interesting side note, it seems a lot of people on Steam are having problems with Fallout 3 at the moment. Mainly due to Fallout 3 not working properly with Windows 7. Here's a screen shot of Steam's Fallout 3 store page.

"Notice: Fallout 3 is not optimized for Windows 7 and later" - Steam

Fallout: New Vegas on the other hand is running just fine.
 
I am not sure what you are getting at... FO3 was released in 2008 for win xp, a year before WIN7 was lunched and iirc its last DLC shipped also before WIN7 lunch.. meanwhile FO:NV was released in 2010 - So you might want to rethink this logic fail..

@Crni Vuk, The critical mass of people play the game at ~release, and that first impression is what they retain.
 
Last edited:
Everytime a Fo3 fan cites the bugs in New Vegas as a reason for it being inferior to 3 I always bring up how often characters would fall through the ground in 3, there was even a special coordinate for them to teleport to when they fell off the map or the Land of the red question marks DLC.
 
I at least managed to make it run when I shut down all that Games for Windows Live dlc with a fan made program.
Still buggy as hell though, especially compared to Fallout 3. In general I never encountered NPCs or objects that would go into the air, stretch or bounce around, and then launch away.
But in Fallout 3 during my first session in years, bingo!
 
Everytime a Fo3 fan cites the bugs in New Vegas as a reason for it being inferior to 3[..]
I suppose that there might be some FO3 fans citing bugs some pages ago, but I came to realize that you usually post like Nelson and with everyone/everything being stupid/incompetent/kids..
 
As another example, the early game of Fallout 1 and 2 is a time wasting chore. Getting from Arroyo to the Den or from Vault 13 to shady sands should not be the hardest part of the Goddamn game
You certainly dont get idea of random encounters and beauty of it.
So what, it should be better to have empty world map with some auto sign, showing you where to go?
No for dumbing down games.
 
Back
Top