Once again, not talking about Fallout 3 or Fallout 4. We're actually revising a game.
Dungeons is short for an area that forces the player to react with violence, sorry for the confusion.
Well, at least I don't care about "Staying true", mainly because I never said it wasn't.
Revising the game how? With mods? Well, New Vegas's shitty fps mechanics mostly inherited from Fallout 3's engine, but even then Obsidian managed to improved upon it so good with a more stable version of ironsights compared to the mod for Fallout 3, damage thresholds, weapon mods, and some other tweaks here and there. Don't call its' 'gameplay' shitty, because 'gameplay' were quite a loose term for an RPG. Skills checks are also a part of a gameplay of an RPG, and New Vegas handled it far better than Fallout 3 and obviously than Fallout 4.
Fallout 4's 'better fps mechanics' were because it was handled by id Software, known for many good fps games, so there's really no way of giving Bethesda Game Studio 'a credit where it's due'. Seriously.
If you don't care whether a Fallout game "Staying true" or not, then don't get mad when people here call out on you saying how Fallout 3/4 are better than New Vegas, in whatever capacity, whether with mods or not.
Don't care about "Real" Fallout games right now. Now we're seeing what could've been done better in New Vegas.
There are certainly moments when we go, "Ah, this could've been done better", and then we recognize there are mods to do that, but there were certainly not THAT much mods needed to make New Vegas better than it was, especially since we can attribute the lack of this and that in New Vegas to the fact that they only got 18 months to finish the game.
Compare that to Fallout 4 that supposedly take 7 years (though it would make much more sense if it actually took like 3-4 years top after finished with Skyrim), the amount of people saying, "This is wrong." and "This could've been done better.", then you know there's problems. Of course, since you don't care if Fallout 4 stayed true to what made Fallout Fallout, you might as well swallowed what Bethesda made even if it wasn't called 'Fallout 4'. So, again, don't get mad when people called you out on saying how Fallout 3/4 > New Vegas. Not saying you can't enjoy Fallout 3/4, but you better have better explanation when you say 3/4 > NV, aside from 'boring world', because boring and fun are subjective.
Fallout 4 is not that far off from Fallout New Vegas. It's got lots of things in common. Lore (sort-of), factions, quirky companions, and (ironically) a lot of words that have been trademarked, like "Nuka."
Because Fallout needs to be exactly those, even if they don't make sense in conjunction to the past established lore. Sure baby.
Of course, like you said, you don't care what made Fallout Fallout.
Oh, and Borderlands is garbage.
And look at Fallout 4! Trying to appeal to Borderlands's fanbase, what's up with all of those Legendary shits and stuff? Of course, you could easily said that you disliked the Legendary aspect in Fallout 4, but for you saying Borderlands is garbage, could've been taken as also Fallout 4 is garbage.
