Mr Fish
Slippy sloppy, The
After seeing this... How the hell did it score so well with critics? I mean... The whole point of a console game is that it is supposed to be guaranteed to work by just putting in the disc. No worries about outdated hardware, no worry about ram or specific video card limitations. No worry about programs running in the background. No worry about the hundreds or thousands of variables that account for overall performance of the game. Just put in the game and play. The game is supposed to be optimized for the console to work. Toddie Boi, you're either delusional or lying when you say "it just works".
This is pathetic. I mean it, it is fucking pathetic. A studio who's had this amount of time to work on their engine, who focus their game design with consoles in mind, who allow the PC versions UI to be bogged down by its console controller design, a studio who is console focused can't get the game to run smoothly?
It's pathetic.
One could always blame the PC version of being too demanding for a game of so much stuff going on in it and that in order to play it on higher settings then you need damn good hardware. Fine. (Nevermind the whole shadow rendering using only 1 CPU and loading all shadows within a distance so that framerate drops dramatically) But the console version? It shouldn't have a constant framerate issue. A few times, fine. But drops like this? And on the Xbox version in particular where it just dead-stopped every one in a while?
Incompetence, shitty QA, bad lead development, bad production schedule, forced out of early production, doesn't matter what excuse you wanna pull. A triple-a title that's been in the works for 4, technially 7, years by a studio who's used the same engine for well over a decade who 'should' be experienced with this engine and its limitations and know what to do and what not to do for the best performance; A studio like this should be ashamed of themselves for releasing something like this.
There are so many problems with Fallout 4 that I could list but some of them are subjective and biased but if there is one thing that is just cold hard facts it is performance. It is either good or it is bad. And this is bad.
And yet, critics still gushed over how amazing it is and gave it great scores. Wasn't Gamergate supposed to stop corruption in video game journalism?