MurkyShadow
Still Mildly Glowing

MurkyShadow said:Problem for me is, it stays shooter. For that one, yeah,
Vegas might be really good for what it is. It's just, I
can't get myself interested, the mechanics, it's not
a kind of game that stirs my love. Would love to love
it, but I can't.
I've heard New Vegas is less of a shooter (or, at least, can be less of a shooter) than Fallout 3 was. Technically, Fallout 1 and 2 were shooters in the loosest sense of the word, but I see your point. A turn based, iso title is more akin to chess than halo.[/quote]
Maybe that's the point. I see myself investing less time in games,
then, let's say, 10 years ago, and I like to kind of relax, do it in
my own time. So I guess I'm just not the target audience
anymore too.

There are some RTS titles I play too, but I rather like the older
C&C titles, then newer iterations of the genre.
One problem with turn based games is often, that
they end up in micromanagement hell.
Ah, don't I sound picky...
