Fallout Nuka World DLC trailer and information are online

You mean the scores known to be frequently raided
Is there some meme I am missing here? You keep repeating that phrase like it means something. Is it an in-joke aimed at people who say anything positive about Bethesda or something?
Fallout 4 is the lowest rated Fallout game and Bethesda Game Studios game ever made according to Steam. It is the lowest rated Fallout game second to Fallout: Brotherhood of Steel on Metacritic by User Score.

I'm sorry this is an inconvenient truth for you. Perhaps the negative reviewers don't understand their own physiology?

Coincidentally, Fallout: New Vegas is the highest rated Fallout game on Steam.
 
Fallout 4 is the lowest rated Fallout game and Bethesda Game Studios game ever made according to Steam. It is the lowest rated Fallout game second to Fallout: Brotherhood of Steel on Metacritic by User Score.

I'm sorry this is an inconvenient truth for you. Perhaps the negative reviewers don't understand their own physiology?
And its still a massively well rated games in general, as well as the second most played single player game on Steam, only behind Skyrim, which it beats depending on the day. So hated that everyone keeps playing it. Truely the scores are an accurate representation of how people feel about it.

And again, what is this joke about? It really doesn't make any sense.
 
And its still a massively well rated games in general, as well as the second most played single player game on Steam, only behind Skyrim, which it beats depending on the day. So hated that everyone keeps playing it. Truely the scores are an accurate representation of how people feel about it.
Then what we say shouldn't even trigger you or make you defend Fallout 4 like a snide white knight. Why so defensive then?

Is it because you want us to understand our own physiology?
 
Funny, but missing the point entierly.
Care to explain yourself? I showed you the very two games that should suffer the most from those so-called 'raids' (which were cleaned up by metacritic staff, BTW if you don't remember. Original score was even lower for Fallout 4). They didn't. So?
 
Then what we say shouldn't even trigger you or make you defend Fallout 4 like a snide white knight. Why so defensive then?
I'm not even defending Fallout 4, I was just pointing out how the supposed "inconsistency" was not one.

Pointing out the flaw of an argument =/= defneding the thing you are arguing about, ts just pointing out the flaw in the argument.
 
The one where the people who make faux Coca-Cola double as Nuclear physicists? Indeed, no inconsistency there.
As pointed out before, they aren't nuclear scientists, nor are treated as such by the DLC.

The fact you have to keep resorting to this fallacious argument speaks volumes of your character.
 
I'm not even defending Fallout 4, I was just pointing out how the supposed "inconsistency" was not one.

Pointing out the flaw of an argument =/= defneding the thing you are arguing about, ts just pointing out the flaw in the argument.
Your initial post clarifying the military hardware was fine. It was clarification. That was fine.

Then you went out of your way to reply to most people here and even snidely put down their points with one-liners. That gives the impression of being defensive. Ipso facto, defensive.

speaks volumes of your character
:roffle: Now going for insults on character. That'll show em for sure!

Then again, we obviously don't understand our own physiology alongside our fellow ghouls.
 
:roffle: Now going for insults on character. That'll show em for sure!

Then again, we obviously don't understand our own physiology alongside our fellow ghouls.
Well as you can see in the links I posted, the last time he was here he was calling people "dyslexic" and "autistic" so this is really par for the course.
 
Well as you can see in the links I posted, the last time he was here he was calling people "dyslexic" and "autistic" so this is really par for the course.
He must feel so isolated out here away from his own fellow Fallout 'lovers' with their singular, if somewhat varied, opinions.

August 30th is probably the day to watch Bethesda fans gush and actual Fallout fans having a variety of responses.
 
Please, elaborate.
Constant overuse of fallacious arguments to try to make a point only speak of a lack of unwillingness to engage in honest debate, or accept alternate viewpoints, and speak more of blind fanaticism when it comes to your stance. Its hard to take you seriously when you do that.

Then you went out of your way to reply to most people here and even snidely put down their points with one-liners. That gives the impression of being defensive. Ipso facto, defensive.

Then again, we obviously don't understand our own physiology alongside our fellow ghouls.
Ironic for you to say that given that you keep using this meme joke instead of engaging in actual honest debate.
 
Well that is a rather nonsensical retcon by Obsidian, and conflict with what we saw in Fallout 1/2 were Nuka-Cola was the only soft drink in California.
Where in Fallout 1/2 does it say only Nuka-Cola exists? In Fallout 1 for example Nuka-Cola wasn't even that common or important (it was just a joke about Coca-cola) and there was only three drinks in the game (Nuka-Cola, Booze and Beer), are you saying the Americans didn't drink anything else besides Nuka-Cola, Beer and Booze?
Someone who doesn't want their shit bombed because its an obvious target like West-Tek did. Also, the Nuka Cola bottling plant at the park was a research lab, it was later converted into a ride after the park opened. and even then, you literally couldn't get off the ride, while the lab was far underground, far away from the ride itself.
Who in their perfect sense would spend bombs/missiles which due to the resources being depleted would be costly to produce bombing a damn soda factory/lab?
Don't join the army thinking you will make it to general because your skills of strategy and resource management leave something to be desired.
 
Ironic for you to say that given that you keep using this meme joke instead of engaging in actual honest debate.
Well, I did raise my points several pages ago. Funny how you didn't reply to any of them so I'm not bothering debating with someone who seems unwilling to concede or remain civil (and resorting to crude and simplistic insults) while debating.

Besides the joke shows how I'm aware that I don't understand my own physiology.
 
Where in Fallout 1/2 does it say only Nuka-Cola exists? In Fallout 1 for example Nuka-Cola wasn't even that common or important (it was just a joke about Coca-cola) and there was only three drinks in the game (Nuka-Cola, Booze and Beer), are you saying the Americans didn't drink anything else besides Nuka-Cola, Beer and Booze?

Who in their perfect sense would spend bombs/missiles which due to the resources being depleted would be costly to produce bombing a damn soda factory/lab?
Don't join the army thinking you will make it to general because your skills of strategy and resource management leave something to be desired.
The fact that no other drinks are mentioned when they easily could have even if they weren't in-game items. You know, basic world building every good RPG does.

That's exactly my point dingus. Its in the factory because no one would bomb it because its such a seemingly pointless target.

Well, I did raise my points several pages ago. Funny how you didn't reply to any of them so I'm not bothering debating with someone who seems unwilling to concede or remain civil (and resorting to crude and simplistic insults) while debating.
I honestly must have missed them due to the replies stacking up so quickly.
 
Constant overuse of fallacious arguments to try to make a point only speak of a lack of unwillingness to engage in honest debate, or accept alternate viewpoints, and speak more of blind fanaticism when it comes to your stance. Its hard to take you seriously when you do that.
I was going to post that whole 'I'm rubber, you're glue!' thing in jest, but Jesus, you genuinely gave a fairly accurate description of yourself (or rather, of your actions, I'm not an internet psychologist). There's a word for occasions like this, is this a Freudian slip? I'm going to go to google and see if I can find the actual term.
 
you genuinely gave a fairly accurate description of yourself
In what why? Honestly curious. Every argument I have made thus far rests on the basic ideas that Fallout has always been this way, which isn't a fallacy, its pointing out thats the way the game always has been.
 
Back
Top