Just because I know how to use a joke doesn't mean I'm not open to debate. Just not with someone so defensive and crude.
I'm using the point of espionage, not the general public (though some young hoodlums could break into the park and find hints of such activities). If I were account for some of Fallout 3's tech, a spy could stumble onto hints of such a facility. It would not make for a good hidden installation since the clues would start to add up(unlike Big Mountain's mountain - until their experiments blew up the mountain, revealing the facility).
You will have to excuse my defensiveness when dealing with a group of people known to be so hostile and belligerent that even the very company they defended so much in the past has openly mocked them repeatedly, and they have become one of the most infamous websites on the Internet along with that cesspool that is RPGCodex
Its no more or less hidden then a number of real world military instillations like Area 51. Using Fallout's tech, especially the Chinese's stealth suits, one could easily break into near anywhere. Just like we saw in New Vegas with the attempted Hoover Dam sabotage, and the Niagara Falls Sabotage mentioned in lore once or twice.
If we are going by the capabilities of Chinese espionage, nowhere is safe. However, something like a Nuka-Cola theme park is far less obvious a target then an actual military base like Mariposa or West-Tek. Probably why West-Tek got hit in the war, and the Nuka Cola park didn't.
-You cite no evidence for your hypothesis, when it's disproved by others citing moments you either never discovered or forgot about, you ignore it and move along.
-You also don't consider JRR Tolkien (the father of modern fantasy) an authoritative figure in literature, apparently.
-You have previously called others autistic and dyslexic in the heat of argument.
-Self explanatory.
-I actually haven't made any reference to other Fallouts, let along revered them in this thread, haven't really shown myself a fanatic for anything.
-Anyway, you clearly have an inability to see the flaws in this DLC (which I've yet to play).
-Honestly going back through this thread, I was nothing but cordial to you until you claimed I merely wanted 'MUH REALISM', it took you acting like a prick for me to treat you like a prick.
-I listed off a whole bunch of goofy shit from Fallout1/2/New Vegas to prove the point that this level of goofy isn't uncommon in the series. Nor has anyone really disproved those points either.
-Actually no, if you go back and read what I said, I said his style doesn't matter for Fallout, because Fallout is fundamentally designed to be entirely different compared to Lord of the Rings in terms of realism and beliveability.
-And you have posted a dumb joke more times then I can count. Can't really complain when you do it yourself. See hypocrisy.
-Not really
-I never said you did make references to older Fallout games.
-The only flaw I see if your repeated attempts to call all the silly parts of Fallout "Problem A, which doesn't excuse Problem B", which only shows a clear lack of understand of some of the most basic elements of Fallout.
-Actually you were kind of a dick, for some time. And the constant use of fallacious arguments, and dismissing everything you don't like about the series as "Problem A, which doesn't excuse Problem B" got grating because its not even an argument, its just going "well, yeah, Fallout has that kinda stuff, but I view that as as problem, and are thus going to ignore the fact the series has always been like that!" which is honestly just paramount to putting your hand over your ears and yelling NO! over and over again. something NMA isnt exactly unknown for doing.