It's the funniest thing in the world to hear the the very reasons and assurances of FO4 being everything good about FO3 ~and more; and that they didn't reinvent the wheel... being placed in a positive light... and cast as appropriate... When it was these self same reasons and pleas for assurance that FO3 be everything good about FO2 ~and more... that were laughed off as naive and said to be not the way Bethesda does games, and that no one should expect the same game as a sequel. :ROFL: [:bang-head-til-it-bleeds:]
Yes. Since they feel the need to make the game a shooter, at least they should make it a good shooter. Hopefully this means that the retarded -- and I mean retarded even by Bethesda standards -- way bullets simply did no damage at all when hitting at longer ranges has been done away with. It seems kind of pointless to implement a holding breath feature, if that limitation still is in the game.
The recent Mortal Kombat game got old watching the trailer; (And I play MK1 & 2 several times a day ~every day).
Ahh, but you must understand that the important part is that after the bodies have exploded, you can pick up and move the giblets around. You can also put them on shelves or in buckets. Or maybe roll them down hills. Or decorate your home with them and be as cool as all the vampires/super mutants/necromancers. This is in my opinion essential in a good role-playing game. I mean, Fallout, PS:Torment and Baldur's Gate II were all decent RPGs, but they clearly lacked that little extra that would have made them truly great (like Oblivion). Namely being able to interact with exploded body parts.
The recent Mortal Kombat game got old watching the trailer; (And I play MK1 & 2 several times a day ~every day).
I don't think Bethesda's main audience thinks it gets old in FO3.
There is some irony hidden in this post.
Out of curiosity, how many of the new features were practically already mods on the Nexus and may come across as flat out rip-offs on Bethesda's part?
