T
TheGM
The voice of reason
You forgot the most important character, Space Tits.
I mean Seven of Nine. The Rule 63 version of Spock. once she shows up the entire show is about her and Captain Insaneway going on wacky Adventures and punching out the borg every week.
Seven was a promising character, and Jeri Ryan has some acting chops. Sadly, the character was designed as eye candy, which diminished her hard. Still, the last seasons mostly shined when the episodes were about the Doctor or Seven. Or, best of all, both. The one where the Doctor was hiding inside Seven's implants so it was basically Jeri Ryan playing Robert Picardo playing the Doctor was pretty funny.
Sadly, Janeway's character took a bit of weird turn and acted quite odd sometimes, but all in all I think Voyager got a worse reputation than it deserves. On the other hand, Voyager was the show I grew up most on since it was on when I was a kid mostly, so that might cloud my judgement.
All in all I guess DS9 and TNG share the spot for the best Star Trek show.
Sadly, Janeway's character took a bit of weird turn and acted quite odd sometimes, but all in all I think Voyager got a worse reputation than it deserves. On the other hand, Voyager was the show I grew up most on since it was on when I was a kid mostly, so that might cloud my judgement.
All in all I guess DS9 and TNG share the spot for the best Star Trek show.
TheGM
The voice of reason
As a kid I hated Deep Sleep 9 and found Voyager to be watchable. time and rewatch has changed that opinion greatly.
Well you have three to four writing teams and each has their vision of Janeway so that is how she can shift from being Picard esq to a fucking axe murder on an episode to episode basis.
R.Graves
Confirmed Retard
like i said i only watched most of the first season.
also
>designing a character to be overly sexualised
>putting major focus on the tits
>what is this the 90s?
face>ass>thighs/iegs>tits>feet
such is the order of things
a really good midriff is the absolute hottest as well.
Last edited:
Yes.
Well, to be fair, it's not like Seven's costume doesn't show off all of her, uh, qualities equally, or that she's lacking in any aforementioned department.
R.Graves
Confirmed Retard
i guess.
>be watching viva la bam
>gang steals april's car
>they tell her Ryan dunn did it
>"why would ryan dunn, a man who has flipped more cars than evil kenevil, take my car?"
>be watching viva la bam
>gang steals april's car
>they tell her Ryan dunn did it
>"why would ryan dunn, a man who has flipped more cars than evil kenevil, take my car?"
Give @Black Rose ‘s car back, Ryan Dunn, you prick.
You can pry that car out of his cold, dead hands.
HydroFlame
The Vanishing Act
That must be a tiny car, or he has gigantic hands, lol.
R.Graves
Confirmed Retard
can't. he died in a car crash in 2011.
So a dead man stole Rose’s car? Fucking shambler.
HydroFlame
The Vanishing Act
You did not know Ryan Dunn was dead?
I knew, I just wanted Graves to comment on that fact so I could make a zombie joke.
T
TorontoReign
Guest
Is Bam next or Steve-O? I vote Bam.
MutantScalper
Dogmeat
Bam looks like he's hit the sauce bottle a little too hard. Steve O sobered up, I think? But, he could be failing his sobering up. They're both friends with Ville Valo, the singer of the band HIM.
Anyway, if I ever get a tattoo it will be like the one Steve O has on his back.
Anyway, if I ever get a tattoo it will be like the one Steve O has on his back.
The Outsider
Wandering Entity
Have anyone played The Witcher 3? Because I've been investing my time in this game, despite that I'm doing other quests that is around my level (12) before progressing to the main quests, and so far I loved it. This is a perfect blend of Action and Role-Playing and thank god I bought the complete edition for this game.
Yeah I know, I'm over three years late (almost 4 years to be exact
). But hey, it's better late than never because I've got lots of hours I'm looking forward to invest in this game. At least it's an actual Action RPG than with Todd Howard's adoptive franchise's fourth main entry.
[It's Fallout 4 if anyone doesn't get what I'm saying, because I don't want to talk all about it and I'm tired as hell anyways, maybe I should catch some sleep... (IF MY BRAIN CAN ACTUALLY LET ME FUCKING SLEEP THAT IS, JUST FUCK MY LIFE AM I RIGHT?!?!) but it can't be helped, so I'll find a way.]
Care to share your thoughts?
Yeah I know, I'm over three years late (almost 4 years to be exact
). But hey, it's better late than never because I've got lots of hours I'm looking forward to invest in this game. At least it's an actual Action RPG than with Todd Howard's adoptive franchise's fourth main entry.[It's Fallout 4 if anyone doesn't get what I'm saying, because I don't want to talk all about it and I'm tired as hell anyways, maybe I should catch some sleep... (IF MY BRAIN CAN ACTUALLY LET ME FUCKING SLEEP THAT IS, JUST FUCK MY LIFE AM I RIGHT?!?!) but it can't be helped, so I'll find a way.]
Care to share your thoughts?
Gizmojunk
Antediluvian as Feck
I wanted to like W3; I had [small] hopes that they would restore the series' critical gameplay in the third game—despite adding the open world aspect —that I wish it didn't have, (funny how the same can be said of FO3), but alas, so far it plays like W2 instead of W1. Geralt is again the puppet instead of the pragmatic professional.
I've had Witcher 3 since Day 1, and it never held my interest long enough to even exit the tutorial area; W2, I don't recall staying interested past the Kraken battle. W1 was superb, and I played it through to the end for all campaigns—being further, and further impressed with it, as the game progressed.
I did really like the W2 replacement intro cinematic. (For those who don't recall, the initial release of W2 had an in-engine cutscene with Geralt stumbling out of the woods; and as with all in-engine cutscenes, its visual quality suffered commensurate to the player's hardware). I did not like the W2's loss of combat disciplines, bar fights, advanced alchemy, and intelligent choice in the use of potions; all lost from the original gameplay; not to mention the three camera systems also lost.
On the whole, IMO Geralt's appearance/physical likeness has changed for the worse with each new installment of the franchise; it's not change due to age, he simply doesn't look like he was ever the same person as before.
I've had Witcher 3 since Day 1, and it never held my interest long enough to even exit the tutorial area; W2, I don't recall staying interested past the Kraken battle. W1 was superb, and I played it through to the end for all campaigns—being further, and further impressed with it, as the game progressed.
I did really like the W2 replacement intro cinematic. (For those who don't recall, the initial release of W2 had an in-engine cutscene with Geralt stumbling out of the woods; and as with all in-engine cutscenes, its visual quality suffered commensurate to the player's hardware). I did not like the W2's loss of combat disciplines, bar fights, advanced alchemy, and intelligent choice in the use of potions; all lost from the original gameplay; not to mention the three camera systems also lost.
On the whole, IMO Geralt's appearance/physical likeness has changed for the worse with each new installment of the franchise; it's not change due to age, he simply doesn't look like he was ever the same person as before.
Last edited:
T
TorontoReign
Guest
Witcher 2 sucked major balls compared to the first one. 3 was a bit mediocre from the looks of it with the plague of Skyrim upon it's design. I still want to play it though. I just feel the narrow focus made the first one better.