Guiltyofbeingtrite
Vault Dweller
I guess they figure it increases overall revenue, but why not shed the SP and only charge $40, or $50? Just make skirmishlike battles like in BF1942 (only one I know well)
Guiltyofbeingtrite said:If anyone is a Command and Conquer Renegade fan there is a UT3 mod that will eventually be a standalone game, below is a trailer. Looks amazing I say. Renegade was some of my favorite multiplayer ever.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jNpPQN758u
Guiltyofbeingtrite said:If anyone is a Command and Conquer Renegade fan there is a UT3 mod that will eventually be a standalone game, below is a trailer. Looks amazing I say. Renegade was some of my favorite multiplayer ever.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jNpPQN758u
Atomkilla said:Guiltyofbeingtrite said:If anyone is a Command and Conquer Renegade fan there is a UT3 mod that will eventually be a standalone game, below is a trailer. Looks amazing I say. Renegade was some of my favorite multiplayer ever.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jNpPQN758u
The link seems to be broken.
The URL contained a malformed video ID.
Because they want there product to reach as many people as possible.Single-player is for people who don`t or can`t go online to play multiplayer.However,as far as I remeber at least,Devolpers and producers of games are losing revenue thanks to this mindset that a game needs kick-ass sp and mind-blowing mp.This mindset is what started that rumour about Modern Warfare 2 makers or devolpers charging for multiplayer.If I can find a link to this I`ll update.Guiltyofbeingtrite said:I guess they figure it increases overall revenue, but why not shed the SP and only charge $40, or $50? Just make skirmishlike battles like in BF1942 (only one I know well)
Guiltyofbeingtrite said:
Games and movies are different things (somethign the Battlefield 3 guys didn't understand with their SP campaing) well except for graphic adventures, thsoe are awesome, but if you are buying a game that is made for multiplayer but you can't play the multiplayer you should better spend that money on something that you will actually enjoy, kind of a simple thing to understand. So I prefer no tacked on single player campaings.Bakura said:Because playing the latest game is like watching the the latest movie:you have to play so you`er not left out in tommorrows conversation.
Games and movies are not as different as you think:Both cost shit tons of money to make.Some are so rememerable that people builds sites just for that game or movie.As for buying games for single player:Well not everyone has internet(I know,it`s sad,but true)but still want to play Battlefield 3 anyway.Others just don`t play online.Those people then complan about the fact that the brand-new $60 game lasted barly 5 hours.It`s not that they did not enjoy it,its the fact that the game only(for them)lasted 5 hours.Walpknut said:Games and movies are different things (somethign the Battlefield 3 guys didn't understand with their SP campaing) well except for graphic adventures, thsoe are awesome, but if you are buying a game that is made for multiplayer but you can't play the multiplayer you should better spend that money on something that you will actually enjoy, kind of a simple thing to understand. So I prefer no tacked on single player campaings.Bakura said:Because playing the latest game is like watching the the latest movie:you have to play so you`er not left out in tommorrows conversation.
And also I don't waste money on a movie I know I won't liek just because people around did.
Guiltyofbeingtrite said:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jNpPQN758uc
there we go.