Gun Control

What was your point.
Que?

Read my post again, I thought I was pretty clear about it.


Crni

People are STUPID. Plenty of people have gotten the same treatment online, its a fact of life. Anita Sarkeesian wasn't a politician either, just someone with REALLY STRONG opinions.
I always think this kind of stuff is self-evident.

What has Anita to do with it, or anything else that isn't meant to be criticism of some REALLY STRONG opinion but to attack the person?

The fact that 'plenty of people' got the same treatment, doesnt justify anything here. Besides, we're talking about photoshoped images which are shared on websites appearing to be like 'news' with the intention to manipulate people and their opinions. Big difference from some weirdos sitting in forums talking shit about Anita. The moment you make false accusations and sharing them on the internet, you can be draged in to a court room. That's the point. And that is where I think people cross a line.
 
Last edited:
Unless your point is that bipartisanship is dead because retards on Facebook are circle-jerking memes, then no I don't understand what your point is.
 
Crni

My point is you act all surprised like it happened. As soon as that girl decided to go speak out publicly, she slapped a giant bulls eye on her back. People don't get to go public like that and get only an echo chamber.
 
All I am saying is that it's wrong. What the hell guys ... and rationalizing 'fabricated' and 'false' informations is what's actually surprising.
 
And people who come here trolling for F3 get shit on too.

Some of those students talk real arrogant, throwing around blanket statements or insults on other people. You don't get to do that and not get some flak in return.
 
Just in case you're defending a hypothethical, this is the main example.

DZF9OLRUMAEp1JW.png

DZF9O48VAAAsBZQ.png
There is that one little distinction to make, too. First, she's like a month older than me. Just barely an adult. And second, she's a victim survivor, not some sort of crazy opponent, that is until February whence she's become more of an activist that has done a surprising amount of things for her age and tack with the Florida Legislature earlier this month.

But hey yeah, bullying children for speaking out is totally normal and okay. Totally not tellatale of ridiculous political split. She knew what she was in for for going to school! Fucking millenials, all wanting to reduce the chance to get shot and shit. #BS rofl! <millenials and their cellphones something something>

The above not anywhere near alien to these comments, sadly.

Damn, that like/dislike ratio.

Reading through their site there's really nothing all that out there, "surprisingly" enough.
 
'We certainly do not understand why it should be harder to make plans with friends on weekends than to buy an automatic or semi-automatic weapon.'

That is a fucking lie. There are waiting periods, background checks and that is only for LEGAL weapons. In order to buy full auto, you have to apply for an expensive liscence and get checked by the ATF and be a shop owner.

She has every right to speech but she also has every right to get corrected when she says shit that is wrong.

It is fucking obnoxious. If your going to make a speech, at least say things that are correct. If we are all too willing to give Trump shit for talking out of his ass, then other should be held to the same standard.
 
'We certainly do not understand why it should be harder to make plans with friends on weekends than to buy an automatic or semi-automatic weapon.'

That is a fucking lie. There are waiting periods, background checks and that is only for LEGAL weapons. In order to buy full auto, you have to apply for an expensive liscence and get checked by the ATF and be a shop owner.

She has every right to speech but she also has every right to get corrected when she says in correct shit.

Yep. Full autos are so common I have never seen one owned by a civilian and I live in the south.
 
Does being whitewashed and edited in tatoos and baggy eyes constitute as a correction? :aiee:

That's a bit of a hyperbolic statement, anyway. The site already explains that automatic weapons are mainly accesible via bump stocks to the average joe at best.

Albeit, I wonder if someone capable of starting a mass shooting would be the type to show their guns off. Just a thought.
 
I am not defending the attack, but the expectation that she not get any criticism whatsoever.

Bump stocks increase RoF but it is still NOT full auto. If your going to say something, make sure it is ACCURATE.
 
Does being whitewashed and edited in tatoos and baggy eyes constitute as a correction? :aiee:

That's a bit of a hyperbolic statement, anyway. The site already explains that automatic weapons are mainly accesible via bump stocks to the average joe at best.

Yeah, and rarely used in mass shootings.
 
And they are banned on NRA owned ranges
And the NRA supports a ban on bump stocks

Oh wait the NRA are suppose to be evil, I should quit talking (not directed toward you torontrayne)

I read you. I do think the NRA hold Trump's nuts, but they aren't evil - just a tool used by the elite so they can sell more guns.

:deal:

Which might not be such a bad thing...it is all we make these days!

:cool:
 
just a tool used by the elite so they can sell more guns.

Uhhhmmm, they are funded by regular citizens who hold memberships and when the politicians they support get in then tend to loose memberships and gun sales tend to go down (Trumps election has been one of the things blamed for Remington's recent bankruptcy as gun sales tanked after the election). Meanwhile most gun control movements funding can be traced back to Bloomberg and the Hollywood elite. The NRA speaks for and protects its members, the gun control org's are funded by elites surrounded by armed bodyguards. Trace the money trail.......................
 
Back
Top