Hello, old friend
- Thread starter Brother None
- Start date
13pm
Water Chip? Been There, Done That
Ausir said:
Thanks, Cap!
I'm talking about the lower part.
Ausir said:
Late again. You're getting old.
Reconite said:
The texture does look way too smooth. Then again, the image's name on BethBlog was FalloutNVBeta 2010-08-10 10-34-44-28, so perhaps they're still going to roughen it up a bit.
pndragon26
First time out of the vault
That is nice to see... hope the rest of the game shapes up as well.
Also as good as a lot of the voice casting is, there is one question seemingly left unanswered.
Who thought it was a good idea to cast Matthew Perry to voice anything?
Who thought it was a good idea to cast Matthew Perry to voice anything?
Ghouly89
It Wandered In From the Wastes
Although they captured the better details at least good enough to make out that it's Marcus, I'll never be happy with the shitty textures in this engine.
If I have to do it myself, I will bring back the era of the detailed talking heads and the isometric game engines! Go 2d!
Join the revolution today!
If I have to do it myself, I will bring back the era of the detailed talking heads and the isometric game engines! Go 2d!
Join the revolution today!
That is a nice change from the F3 Ogres. Hooray for paying attention to source material!
And on a different subject...
http://www.tv.com/benson/scenario/episode/31705/summary.html
And on a different subject...
What, no mention of his role in Benson? That show even had a fallout shelter episode:Brother None said:
http://www.tv.com/benson/scenario/episode/31705/summary.html
The lookt it is not that makes me worry young padawan.Ausir said:
What a coinsidence that you compare both Fallout 2 and Fallout Vegas that way as it somewhat is quite interesting from some point in my eyes.alec said:Yay!
Any irony aside I find it somewhat interesting that Fallout 1 and 2 managed with rendered images such details more then 15 years ago while things with "new engines" look much worse compared to that today ~ no one can seriously tell me Fallout 3s faces look better then any of the Fallout 1 or 2 renders. One can only imagine what kind of preredenred scenes they could achieve today with current technologies and such. Well somehow shows the different principles behind past and todays games.
Elronologist
First time out of the vault
Wait. If mutants could look like that, why are there those yellow orcs? 
sampson70
Still Mildly Glowing
Maybe a hdtv will help....some people are never happyMettle said:
sampson70
Still Mildly Glowing
Congrats Obsidian,very good job with Marcus! Another good note...there are already more voice actors than FO3!! 
sampson70
Still Mildly Glowing
Well..not so much ,the FO1 & FO2 were CG ,so not a fair comparison .Crni Vuk said:The lookt it is not that makes me worry young padawan.Ausir said:
What a coinsidence that you compare both Fallout 2 and Fallout Vegas that way as it somewhat is quite interesting from some point in my eyes.alec said:Yay!
Any irony aside I find it somewhat interesting that Fallout 1 and 2 managed with rendered images such details more then 15 years ago while things with "new engines" look much worse compared to that today ~ no one can seriously tell me Fallout 3s faces look better then any of the Fallout 1 or 2 renders. One can only imagine what kind of preredenred scenes they could achieve today with current technologies and such. Well somehow shows the different principles behind past and todays games.
More wisdom in the eyes, less Shrek, please.
It's funny how the resolution of the textures drops suddenly below the shoulders. I hope they do custom make the rest of the body. If super mutants NPCs can't wear armor, they should at least try not look as generic.
But i do dig this fanservice.
It's funny how the resolution of the textures drops suddenly below the shoulders. I hope they do custom make the rest of the body. If super mutants NPCs can't wear armor, they should at least try not look as generic.
But i do dig this fanservice.