How excited are you for Fallout 4?

mobucks said:
Im just sick of open world games.

I don't have problems with open world games, if they are good.

I have problems with games, where quest design done by programmers at their free time, dialogs written by CEO kids ("oh, daddy - please!..") and character animation - by pizza delivery boy, when he gets to the building. This is most probably how all Bethesda games are created. They don't make games - they created an engine at some point and now they are just trying to use it somehow.
 
But you're right, FO4 will be Skyrim with guns and prostitutes.

Mobuck's commentaries really made me giggle xD, It's just bordering with ridiculous that I agree so much with him. Im not really tired of the map style i simply don't like it. The idea of having a map that only covers a big city that is just broken into sections just doesn't appeal t all. having a whole state covered by the mad is a whole different thing. And that highwayman made a lot of difference. And no it wont be the same of they just put a car in F3. Please excuse me I got a little carried away.

I would be curious if bethesda say they've got something ground breaking for F4, but certainly not excited, at all, after F3 and FNV i cant say I will be excited about anything that comes that way. I just cant be excited about something that I don't like, I know a lot of people will agree with me on this one.
 
They are probably going to give the people what they want. The bulk of their customers that is, and afaik they want multiplayer, less boring stuff, one told me he wanted fallout to be just like gta, that's nice, it would be called "fallout and/or gta"

No, I'm not excited :D
I AM excited about "mutants rising" and the some-day finished "restoration project".
 
Given that I know nothing about the game, not much? It's great that we'll be getting more Fallout, but on the other hand, I don't think it's all that great that I'll be getting more Bethesda's Fallout. Other people will be elated, of course.
 
zegh8578 said:
No, I'm not excited :D
I AM excited about "mutants rising" and the some-day finished "restoration project".

I couldn't agree more with Zegh, mutants rising is exactly the things I've been wanting to see after Fallout 2 and i've been waiting since 2005 for it. I have very high expectations of it and im excited like hell :D.
 
Sadly I expect this:

aliens-meme.jpg


To answer the question

Am I excited: depends on what concrete info we get

Will I play it: yes
 
Will you even play it?

*Mumbles* Yes.

Will you play it, but stop if it sucks?

*Mumbles* No.

Will you play it all the way through and then feel dirty afterwards?

*Mumbles* Yes.
 
Jax Sparrow said:
I couldn't agree more with Zegh, mutants rising is exactly the things I've been wanting to see after Fallout 2 and i've been waiting since 2005 for it. I have very high expectations of it and im excited like hell :D.


You will not be disappointed. :wink:
 
Am I excited? Yes, kind of. Depends what Bethesda is going to do with it, and what route they're going to take.
Am I going to play it? Yes, if my computer can handle it. If not, I'll have to get a better PC, and that could take a while.
Will I stop if it begins to get boring? Yes, and I shall rage on this forum about it, mark my words.
If it is both boring, ridiculous, fanservicey, and goes against lore, am I going to burn the CD? Yes, and I'll post pictures on the forum of the burning.
 
Oh very!

I can't see to see what they come up with. Hopefully, they incorporate elements from FNV into it (like an improved hardcore mode)
 
I'm worried.

I have every right to be,its being developed by post Skyrim Bethesda, which means, a shitty console port, linear and downright stupid characters + plot, black and white morals, characters with no motives, LE EPIC MAY MAYS, fetch quests, lore raping, tints,Raiders, rubble and it will be on the east coast.

Only thing I am looking forward to is the Creation Engine, a definite improvement over gamebryo.
 
AlphaPromethean said:
Only thing I am looking forward to is the Creation Engine, a definite improvement over gamebryo.

Still not that much.

Also, people who think that Bethesda will learn from FNV. I sadly fear you are deluding yourself.
If anything I think there will even be less skills/more game breaking perks in any sequel.

I foresee a very very very bad Fallout 4.
 
After Skyrim, I'm not optimistic, but you never know. Bethesda might actually have learned from FNV.

(PAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, as if....)
 
zegh8578 said:
They are probably going to give the people what they want. The bulk of their customers that is, and afaik they want multiplayer, less boring stuff, one told me he wanted fallout to be just like gta, that's nice, it would be called "fallout and/or gta"

No, I'm not excited :D
I AM excited about "mutants rising" and the some-day finished "restoration project".

Supposedly Van Buren was to include multiplayer...I'm a big fallout 3 fan, and I still have high hopes and expectations from fallout 4. Don't think that just because this person who said they wanted it to be like gta is like that, that we all are. Because we're not. I want a good, solid rpg just like everyone else. (Also, I think multiplayer would be stupid)
 
To all the people saying that there is no excitement on your end for another Bethesda fallout, does that mean that I won't hear anyone complain about it? Because surely you won't pay 60 dollars for a game you have no interest in, right?
 
There's no bait at the end of that hook, AtomBomb. I don't see that getting a moderate amount of enjoyment from a title and bemoaning the degradation it represents of a favorite franchise are mutually exclusive. You can be lukewarm about a game's potential and still buy it; Fallout fans have been doing both since Tactics. Some early adopters even got started with Fallout 2, which contained its fair share of lulzy BS, logical inconsistencies, and setting dilution as well. You're trying to create a false dichotomy, and (perhaps in tribute to Fallout 3) you're completely ignoring an entire spectrum of greys.

For what it's worth, though, if there's any place on the internet where you will find a sizable population of erstwhile fans avoiding the next title on principle and post-release word-of-mouth, yes, it's likely to be here.
 
Yamu said:
There's no bait at the end of that hook, AtomBomb. I don't see that getting a moderate amount of enjoyment from a title and bemoaning the degradation it represents of a favorite franchise are mutually exclusive. You can be lukewarm about a game's potential and still buy it. Fallout fans have been doing both since Tactics. Some early adopters even got started with Fallout 2, which contained its fair share of lulzy BS, logical inconsistencies, and setting dilution as well. You're trying to create a false dichotomy, and, not unlike the writers at Bethsoft, you're disregarding an entire spectrum of greys.

For what it's worth, though, if there's any place on the internet where you will find a decent population of erstwhile fans avoiding the next title on principle and trusted word-of-mouth, yes, it's likely to be here.

It's a legitimate question. I mean, I'm a jobless 17 year old high school kid. A video game isn't something that comes cheap for me. I only buy a game if I have a strong, genuine interest in it. That's why I want to know if people are willing to pay 60 dollars for a game that they have no interest in, it baffles me.
 
Ahh. Well, apologies, and no hostility intended, though I may be a little (understandably, I hope) defensive. When people ask questions like that around here, it's not often in earnest.

As an addendum to my previous post, a lot of us are probably going to wait and get it later, via Steam Sales or after the GotY edition releases or both (see: my broke ass). Also, a good number of posters here are older fans who can afford to drop the cash on it since we know we're eventually going to buy it anyway. It's just that, whereas it once would've been an investment that was looked forward to with relish, it's now just another overpriced time-sink from the increasingly flashy and dumbed-down Triple-A arm of the industry.
 
Yamu said:
Ahh. Well, apologies, and no hostility intended, though I may be a little (understandably, I hope) defensive. When people ask questions like that around here, it's not often in earnest.

As an addendum to my previous post, a lot of us are probably going to wait and get it later, via Steam Sales or after the GotY edition releases or both (see: my broke ass). Also, a good number of posters here are older fans who can afford to drop the cash on it since we know we're eventually going to buy it anyway. It's just that, whereas it once would've been an investment that was looked forward to with relish, it's now just another overpriced time-sink from the increasingly flashy and dumbed-down Triple-A arm of the industry.

Well, I didn't mean to sound like a douche when asking that question, but i understand why you interpreted it as a shot towards you guys. But lets say money isn't an issue, why would you play a game you are very confident you won't like? For example, if somebody gave me a free copy of black ops 2, it would sit in the corner and gather dust. I have zero interest in it, and therefore I wouldn't play it...my only guess would be the fact that it was a series you once liked and you're playing it out of curiousity to keep up on what they have done to it, is that close?
 
Back
Top