Nuka World: No Review Possible

Railroad's arsenal: weapons that make your permanently invisible. Cannot be reversed.
Do you really think Bethesda would make any irreversible decisions in a Fallout game? This is the studio that gives you a clear warning in big letters when your about to piss off a faction, and makes it so all towns forgive you 3 days later.
 
We talk about it now, because people are still playing it, but down the line no one will be. This thread is just the start of that. Someone who normally reviews this shit has refused to do so because it's unplayable. People still play Fallout 3 because of TTW and other mods, but apparently the modding community has grown fed up of Fallout 4 (and Bethesda) as well. So how many people will actually be playing Fallout 4 by next year? Everyone I know outside of this site has already forgotten about it, for instance.

I'm not saying we VAT it now, but down the line, maybe. That way, we can ignore it and discuss other things. Stop wasting more of our time over it.
 
A mark to signify people's opinions, if those opinions are strong enough to hold up to a vote.
I don't even know what this means. My question was what is the advantage of doing this? If there is none, then there's no reason to do it.
That way, we can ignore it and discuss other things. Stop wasting more of our time over it.
What exactly is stopping you from doing that right now?
 
Personally, I find the idea of vatting the entirety of Fallout 4 amusing, but apparently that's just me.

@Irwin John Finster

Nothing, save just wanting to hear your opinions on it. Remind myself how lucky I am that I never purchased it.

I'm just making the suggestion, same as Practicat, that we VAT the Fallout 4 threads, because Fallout 4 is worthless in every way with POS being its closest companion in the Fallout series.

I can see quite clearly that people aren't interested in doing that just yet. Nonetheless the idea's up in the air now. To be saved for for later.
 
Last edited:
Earth is actually Todd Howard in disguise and he's using reverse psychology to make us talk about his game more.

Heh, well that would make sense, considering Todd Howard is in all of us.

OdJUzT.gif
 
I can see quite clearly that people aren't interested in doing that just yet. Nonetheless the idea's up in the air now. To be saved for for later.
There's still plenty more to come for Fallout 4.

They haven't even released their Fallout 4 Enhanced Edition with an ENB mod for consoles for another $110 like they just did with Skyrim, after all lol.
 
There's still plenty more to come for Fallout 4.

They haven't even released their Fallout 4 Enhanced Edition with an ENB mod for consoles for another $110 like they just did with Skyrim, after all lol.

WHAAAAAT?!

I didn't know about this! Forget everything I've been saying! We've still got plenty more BS to rip apart!
 
I don't even know what this means. My question was what is the advantage of doing this? If there is none, then there's no reason to do it.

What exactly is stopping you from doing that right now?

I'm not part of the NMA staff, so I'd like to get recommendation from one who is, and either create the survey myself or have someone like an admin do it.

We all know there's been vehement displeasure on NMA with Fallout 4, based solely on observation, and to maybe relieve that displeasure, a vote could be held for archiving Fallout 4 as mentioned. To make it fairer (and I'm looking for ways to make it as fair as possible), we could simultaneously do the same for Fallout 3. If NMA votes to archive Fallout 3, then the vote to archive Fallout 4 does not pass. In order to guard the vote, voters must be members of NMA for longer than some to be determined duration of time, and/or users who are not members when the vote begins will not be able to vote.
 
I'm not part of the NMA staff, so I'd like to get recommendation from one who is, and either create the survey myself or have someone like an admin do it.

We all know there's been vehement displeasure on NMA with Fallout 4, based solely on observation, and to maybe relieve that displeasure, a vote could be held for archiving Fallout 4 as mentioned. To make it fairer (and I'm looking for ways to make it as fair as possible), we could simultaneously do the same for Fallout 3. If NMA votes to archive Fallout 3, then the vote to archive Fallout 4 does not pass. In order to guard the vote, voters must be members of NMA for longer than some to be determined duration of time, and/or users who are not members when the vote begins will not be able to vote.
I still am not seeing where you point out the advantage of doing any of this.

You want to archive/vat entire forums because Fallout 4 displeases you? Is that the reason? Either way, good luck with that I guess...
 
and either create the survey myself or have someone like an admin do it
But what will archiving F4 do? Like what will it really do? Not trying to sound like a dickhead but it won't stop Bethesda releasing shitty games, it won't send a message, it won't somehow erase F4's existence. They'd probably laugh if they ever saw it, we're just a minority, and so long as there are 12 yo COD/minecraft fans Bethesda can make as much money as they want, they don't cater to RPG fans anymore, that much should've been apparent with Skyrim.
 
But what will archiving F4 do? Like what will it really do? Not trying to sound like a dickhead but it won't stop Bethesda releasing shitty games, it won't send a message, it won't somehow erase F4's existence. They'd probably laugh if they ever saw it, we're just a minority, and so long as there are 12 yo COD/minecraft fans Bethesda can make as much money as they want, they don't cater to RPG fans anymore, that much should've been apparent with Skyrim.
I know all of that, and this isn't so much about sending a message as it is an answer for ourselves, for our eyes, a resolution to our frequent complaints toward the game and Bethesda that will help us move past it.
 
Back
Top