Apparently in that crazy old USA, people value proveable assertions (like Trump not showing any respect for women) over those that are unproven or straight up whackjob conspiracy theories that people should be ashamed for believing.
If ol "crooked/insert epithet here if you have a childmind" Hillary is really so capable of getting away with things like murder, and she has such vast control and power over people, that 20 years of close scrutiny and millions of dollars of taxpayer money in years of increasingly deep investigations can't find or prove these things, then I think I'd probably call her a strong and capable leader who we should be clamoring to elect.
Yet somehow, nobody mentions this current scary power and capability that Hillary must have in this context, and instead they talk about how her husband (who is not running for office) diddled an intern consentualy back when most of the current voters were children, and when that intern has been quoted as totally wanting that diddling to further her own career. They try to sell us stories of her being weak and on deaths door, and having some different medical troubles every week.
Which one is it?
Is she uber powerful and capable of doing anything she wants with impunity and controlling the USA as a dictator forever, or is she a weak old woman with moments to live who has to be carried around by handlers, and who enabled her husband for "reasons"?