Slavs were the first Europeans!Do you believe it?

[Fas Ist]

You westernets always have to win

I repeated some stuffs 3 or 4 times and you didn't accepted them :!:

Does an Iranian means a person superior to a Turk?Bugars weren't Tirkic people.Can you accept just this?Bulgars have about 10 000 years history-I tell you,Bulgarian history is going to be rewritten!

Yes,I am an Asian,you are superior to me,aren't you.
I am also a racist:

You realise that I am writing total bullshits or things you want to hear(you are the greatest,allah akbar)The next time Arabs attack Europe,Bulgarians,won't save your ass.

 

[Brother None]

You westernets always have to win

I repeated some stuffs 3 or 4 times and you didn't accepted them :!:

That might be because you just say stuff, you don't actually try to prove them. Excuse us for not taking you seriously.

Does an Iranian means a person superior to a Turk?Bugars weren't Tirkic people.Can you accept just this?Bulgars have about 10 000 years history-I tell you,Bulgarian history is going to be rewrited!

As far as I know, Bulgar history goes back to the Pamir Mountains, which is current Kyrgyzstan, Afghanistan and Pakistan. However, I must note that to use such terms is rather backwards. You can't say "Bulgars have Iranian roots" or whatever, since the concept of Iran is newer than the earliest date that the Bulgars could be traced back to

Please try to read a message before replying.

1. I just said Bulgars come from the Pamir Mountains, according to most theories, which means they're *not* Iranian and *not* Turkish
2. Bulgars are generally accepted to have had a large Turkic influence, just like you had a Slavic influence. This doesn't make you Turkic anymore than it makes you Slavic.
3. History isn't actually 10,000 years old and I don't think you can trace Bulgar roots that far back without it intermingling with other Pamir strands either

Also, please *read* and *answer* my question; where and how does the article prove Bulgarians are Thracian?

Yes,I am an Asian,you are superior to me,aren't you.

*sigh* Do you not read? I just stated that speaking of superiority when talking about peoples is ass-retarded, now you try to attack me pretending I think one people superior to another? Please try to read what another person types.

PS: those images are funny, but as always besides the point. Racist has nothing to do with being black (I love it when black people think they can't be racist) or being a national socialist. Racism simply means you're raising one "race" above the other, either in a positive or negative light

 

[Jebus]

Kharn! Be carefull! You are turning his thread into shit!

Come back herding the sheep with me, before you too start hating all Slavic people without a reason!


*goes back to herding his sheep, seperating the Slavic ones from the Superior Western ones*

 

[John Uskglass]

you do NOT come from Thracian ancestors, but from the Bulgars, obviously.

No, the Bulgars where the Altaic people who assraped the local Slavs, Greeks, Latin Speakers and Thracians until they started calling themselves Bulgarians. There's probably more Bulgar blood in a Russian from Kazan then in was ist??
It's actually one of those werid flukes of history that two people are of Altaic origin but not Altaic racially or culturally so close to eachother, and that the Bulgarians have been dominated by about 3 completley diffirent Altaic masters.

He is like a Slavic version of CCR

That's low. I'm not much like was ist??? any more. I'm more trollish.

 

[Fas Ist]

Do you not read?

I am sleeping I will edit some of my posts(encluding this one) tomorrow.I don't think now.

 

[Jebus]

He is like a Slavic version of CCR

That's low. I'm not much like was ist??? any more. I'm more trollish.

Y'know, I never wrote that. Look back.

 

[John Uskglass]

Y'know, I never actually wrote that. Look back.

I DID look back, but assumed I had missed it. Where did was ist get that from? WTF?

 

[Jebus]

He must've heard it on the Communist Nazi Jewish Jebus Network. I thought that was only aired in Canada, though...

 

[Fas Ist]

Y'know, I never actually wrote that. Look back.

I DID look back, but assumed I had missed it. Where did was ist get that from? WTF?

He is lying!Jebus edited that!I remmember everythink my dear!

How's that going to happen, then? Sites like Atapuererca (TD6) and Orce in Spain, Soleilhac and Le Vallonet in France and Monte Poggiolo in Italy are all (except for Orce perhaps, I don't quite rememeber) dated at the latest in the Interglacial OIS 13 (between 528 000 and 478 000 BP. Lots of academics even claim they are over a million years old. That predates your article's earliest date by 450 000 years minimum, my friend.

Where did they come from?Fell from Mars?

Morocco.

He changed "He is like a Slavic version of CCR" with "Morocco"

 

[Brother None]

No, the Bulgars where the Altaic people who assraped the local Slavs, Greeks, Latin Speakers and Thracians until they started calling themselves Bulgarians. There's probably more Bulgar blood in a Russian from Kazan then in was ist??
It's actually one of those werid flukes of history that two people are of Altaic origin but not Altaic racially or culturally so close to eachother, and that the Bulgarians have been dominated by about 3 completley diffirent Altaic masters.

Wait, so where did the Bulgarians come from, and why do we call Bulgars prop-Bulgarians if they're not the ancestors of the Bulgarians?

And what are Bulgarians? Turks?

That's low. I'm not much like was ist??? any more. I'm more trollish.

No, but you damn well resembled him much in the olden days

Now you still argue like him. From your ass.

Ba-da-bum *ching*

Come back herding the sheep with me, before you too start hating all Slavic people without a reason!

Too late! ZOING. I've just been hit by the anti-Slavic Death Ray of Doom.

I HEREBY DECLARE THIS THREAD CAPTURED BY THE ANTI-SLAVIC CONFEDERATION OF THE BENELUX! HEIL JEBUS! Hou-zeee! Hou-zeee! Hou-zeee!

 

[John Uskglass]

He must've heard it on the Communist Nazi Jewish Jebus Network. I thought that was only aired in Canada, though...

No, they have it on satallite now. I was just watching it actually, they had an interview with Malkavian about the future of trying to eradicate the CNJJN.

 

[Fas Ist]

Kharn,

No, the Bulgars where the Altaic people who assraped the local Slavs, Greeks, Latin Speakers and Thracians until they started calling themselves Bulgarians. There's probably more Bulgar blood in a Russian from Kazan then in was ist??
It's actually one of those werid flukes of history that two people are of Altaic origin but not Altaic racially or culturally so close to eachother, and that the Bulgarians have been dominated by about 3 completley diffirent Altaic masters.

I am a Bulgarian,not you.I know better about my origin,not you.Tomorrow I will buy a book(the 12-th Bulgarian Myths) and I will translate the written there-REALLY.I will prove that Bugars come from the pazar of Asia,that they are Indo-European,not Altaic people.Bugars are not Tatars or Turks-just for now Indo-European people!

 

[Jebus]

He changed "He is like a Slavic version of CCR" with "Morocco"

I posted 'Morocco' at 20:07 PM, you quoted me saying 'He's like the Slavic version of CCR!' four hours later. Yet, nowhere does that post say: 'edited'...

Them Slavs...

 

[John Uskglass]

Wait, so where did the Bulgarians come from, and why do we call Bulgars prop-Bulgarians if they're not the ancestors of the Bulgarians?

And what are Bulgarians? Turks?

Well, originally the area was Thracian. Then the Romans came in, and kind of Latinized it, then the Byzantines and the Greek dominated empire began setteling Greeks in the area. Most the big Bulgarian cities where founded by Byzantines.

However, an Altaic group, perhaps Turkik, called the Bolgars splits in half, the Volga Bulgars setteling in Russia and converting to Islam, the other Bolgars move south to Bulgaria.

They set up a Kingdom there in the ruins of the former Byzantine territory, then the already happening Slavic migration starts picking up the pace. They set up a pretty cruel kingdom, ravaging the area and generally shitdicking the Byzantines, until they eventually become Slavic and Orthodox. Eventually, after the Bulgarians start getting thier bloodlust again, the brilliant Byzantine Emporer Basil II defeats a massive Bulgarian army and blinds 99/100 of them.

No, but you damn well resembled him much in the olden days

Now you still argue like him. From your ass.

Ba-da-bum *ching*

I argue like him when I'm in semi-troll, not when I am not trolling (like here)

I am a Bulgarian,not you.I know better about my origin,not you.Tomorrow I will buy a book(the 12-th Bulgarian Myths) and I will translate the written there-REALLY.I will prove that Bugars come from the pazar of Asia,that they are Indo-European,not Altaic people.Bugars are not Tatars or Turks-just for now Indo-European people!

Wihipedia is the source of all understanding on the internet, and it says I am right.

In the late 7th century a branch of the Bulgars led by Khan Asparuh migrated into the northern Balkans, where they merged with the local Slavic and Thracian population to form the first Bulgarian state in 681 AD. Bulgaria was a significant European power in the 9th and the 10th century, while fighting with the Byzantine Empire for the control of the Balkans. The Bulgarian state was crushed by an assault by the Rus in 969 and completely subdued by a determined Byzantine assault under Basil II in 1018.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bulgaria

 

[Fas Ist]

He changed "He is like a Slavic version of CCR" with "Morocco"

I posted 'Morocco' at 20:07 PM, you quoted me saying 'He's like the Slavic version of CCR!' four hours later. Yet, nowhere does that post say: 'edited'...

Them Slavs...

"He is like a Slavic version of CCR" was written just for a few minutes!!!!I saw it!God will punish you!

Bulgaria was one of the three strongest European powers in the period 681 -1018

Jebus,how do you feel?
CCR-just quote the proof that Bulgars are altaic people-I will tell you the thruth.


Good night

 

[Hellion]

I read the first few pages of the "forum" link you provided (it basically is a bunch of guys telling each other how correct each other is ), and suffice to say that I find all the linguistic arguments rather...funny.

A parabolic example: some indian tribe in Hawaii actually has 2 or 3 words that incidentally also exist in Greek language. Yet, you don't see people ranting in forums on how Hawaii is 100% a Greek colony. Such vague linguistic connections is similar to the conversation taking place in that forum.

If I could bother to stay online enough hours I could find a counter-argument for EACH AND EVERY case they state (regarding Greece, "Macedonia" being slavic etc etc) as I've done countless times before, but, alas, I won't bother, simply because I've eventually got tired of people debating this issue over and over and over again with the same arguements being toppled by other arguments yet still going on and on... (and because it is 3 AM here and I've got a pretty important date tomorrow morning, yay for having a life )

Besides, what would the point be? Everybody is so fixed on his belief of what is right that even when one provides indesputable evidence that can't be denied he won't change his views.

On your "57 pages of proof" line: Hell, some time ago I read this (rather funny, actually) uber-nationalistic cr@p "theory" that Greeks actually come from Alpha Centauri or Sirius or sth like that (ph34r t3h @lienz :! . Does the fact that some crazy dude bothered to write 3 books in which he arranges logical evidence and proof on how this is indeed the case automatically make it correct? I think not. The same goes for the above "57 pages".

 

[Brother None]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bulgaria

Dude...

Bulgars (also Bolgars or proto-Bulgarians) a people of Central Asia, probably originally Pamirian, whose branches became Slavicized and perhaps Turkic over time. The Turkic etymology most often given for their name is Bulgha meaning sable and is of totemistic origin.

Am I supposed to be right or wrong here? I don't get it anymore...Bulgars are Pamirian, right? But they're not the ancestors of Bulgarians? I'm still confused, you're not being very clear on what Bulgarian roots are supposed to be

 

[Jebus]

Bulgaria was one of the three strongest European powers in the period 681 -1018

Jebus,how do you feel?

Well;

Flanders has officially been proclaimed Heaven On Earth, and source of all that is good. The most important people in the history of the world live there, and they are destined to rule the world.

 

[Brother None]

Flanders has officially been proclaimed Heaven On Earth, and source of all that is good. The most important people in the history of the world live there, and they are destined to rule the world.

Aye, and remember Belgium is practically the same country as Luxembourg and the Netherlands. The Grand Union of the BeNeLux will rule all the planet and DESTROY ALL SLAVS

HOU ZEE! HOU ZEE!

 

[John Uskglass]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bulgaria

Dude...

Bulgars (also Bolgars or proto-Bulgarians) a people of Central Asia, probably originally Pamirian, whose branches became Slavicized and perhaps Turkic over time. The Turkic etymology most often given for their name is Bulgha meaning sable and is of totemistic origin.

Am I supposed to be right or wrong here? I don't get it anymore...Bulgars are Pamirian, right? But they're not the ancestors of Bulgarians? I'm still confused, you're not being very clear on what Bulgarian roots are supposed to be

Bolgars where originally Pamirian, whatever the hell that is, then they became Turkik, then the the Turkik Bulgars moved South and moved to modern Bulgaria, where they became Slavic.