UniversalWolf
eaten by a grue.
Anyone here know anything about Colt .38 Supers? I have one and I've been trying to find data on it, but they're pretty rare and all the info I've come up with seems confusing or contradictory.
Euhm, there are a huge amount of guns that are nothing more than range guns... What's your point? A lot of stuff isn't practical at all. But that's fine.DirkGently said:Interesting in theory. They're ultimately little more than range guns, which is part of why they suck that they're in .44 or .357 (expensive ammo + only ammo capable of cycling the pistol).
Oh please die.DirkGently said:but to be honest if I had the cash I'd get a pair and deck them out Boondock Saints 2 style.
.38 Super is a souped up 9x19mm. Easier to load to higher pressure to reach higher power factors. Most commercial .38 Super is however anemic shit out of fear of blowing up badly converted pistols.UniversalWolf said:Anyone here know anything about Colt .38 Supers? I have one and I've been trying to find data on it, but they're pretty rare and all the info I've come up with seems confusing or contradictory.
The Desert Eagle shoots slowly if you want to shoot accurately. Recovery time is long before getting back on target.Bal-Sagoth said:Honestly, I doubt many people knock over armored cars these days so the guns they carry are mostly a deterrent factor if anything. It would be pretty intimidating to most I am sure to see that hand cannon strapped to some guy you were thinking about taking on.
SuAside said:It will impress ghetto retards, but it will not stop someone with half a brain and a plan...
UniversalWolf said:I know all about the ammo cost and whatnot for .38 Super. I'm more interested in the specific models because some of them are rare and collectible. The one I have is nothing special as far as I know, but even dating the manufacture has been more confusing than it ought to be. As far as I can tell it was either made in the late 1930s or the 1950s. Both are possible given what I know of it's history.
Yeah, that's an option. I'm trying to avoid paying their archiving fee, though.WillisPDunlevey said:What .38 super do you have? Colt? If its a name brand build like that, its not too hard to find the info through the company's historical division.
See, the funny thing is, my searches turned up a date-of-manufacture in either the late 1930s or the mid 1950s. I can't tell for sure which one is right.WillisPDunlevey said:A quick google search for Colt Commander .38 super turned up a bunch from the 1970s- present listed for $1200+ depending on model and engraving etc.
You probably have a collecters item there and should get a good appraisal/info from Colt so you know what its worth.
Pre-determined and random?Bal-Sagoth said:Every day at pre-determined random intervals ...
LazyGnome said:Pre-determined and random?
My G3 was from 1959...DirtyDreamDesigner said:About CZs: Let me put it this way: There is an old dude in my club who claims to have fired 120 000 rounds through his cz75, and I have no reason to think that he's lying. There are also dudes with twenty and thirty year old CZs that still work like clockwork.
I've also seen a Shadow break twice during a single competition.
YMMV
Bulero said:I usually don't talk about what - if any - guns I own, but because I'm mostly anonymous; among a few as unusual - my Colt 1911 is my favorite - is my Sharps .50-90.
I like revolvers more than pistols, as far as protection and range-firing goes. Any one else agree?
Piston ARs are not worth the trouble, Carib. They add a miriad of problems in an attempt to revolve other problems. I know several people who own the MR223 or have used the HK416N in a workrelated setting and none of them seem that hugely pleased with it.Carib FMJ said:RIFLE: LaRue Tactical OBR 16" Barrel Rifle in 5.56mm. Bushmaster ACR or H&K MR223 (Civilian 416)