Hardboiled Android
Vault Fossil
Nah, even as an action game it wouldn't deserve a 10/10, on account of the terrible AI.
http://gfycat.com/ThatBelatedArkshell#
Nah, even as an action game it wouldn't deserve a 10/10, on account of the terrible AI.
Haha.. What the hell?!Nah, even as an action game it wouldn't deserve a 10/10, on account of the terrible AI.
http://gfycat.com/ThatBelatedArkshell#
What is it these days with gamers defending publishers and developers? It's like they forgot that they are the costumer. Very strange, borderline cultish behaviour. This hyping up everything shit has to stop, as these companies are getting shamless in their money schemes with cut content, idiotic dlc and insane prices.
Nah, even as an action game it wouldn't deserve a 10/10, on account of the terrible AI.
Cut content, insane dlc prices etc is EA, Activision and Ubisoft... those companies have far more haters than fans.
One of the things that gives me hope that Fallout 4 will not be met with universal acclaim is that video game critics, as a whole, seem to be much less effusive with praise for the game of the moment than they were at any point in the previous gen (this makes sense since most of what we've seen since the advent of new consoles is "prettier versions of old formulas").
Nah, even as an action game it wouldn't deserve a 10/10, on account of the terrible AI.
http://gfycat.com/ThatBelatedArkshell#
That's definitely true. It's almost as if the publishers realized that it's better to pay for an ad than a review score (see Destiny). Regardless, I suspect that this will be well-received. Bethesda just doesn't have much if any competition.One of the things that gives me hope that Fallout 4 will not be met with universal acclaim is that video game critics, as a whole, seem to be much less effusive with praise for the game of the moment than they were at any point in the previous gen (this makes sense since most of what we've seen since the advent of new consoles is "prettier versions of old formulas").
Nah, even as an action game it wouldn't deserve a 10/10, on account of the terrible AI.
http://gfycat.com/ThatBelatedArkshell#
What in the unholy fuck was that...
I hope that was an android raider. I have no other explanation.
One of the things that gives me hope that Fallout 4 will not be met with universal acclaim is that video game critics, as a whole, seem to be much less effusive with praise for the game of the moment than they were at any point in the previous gen (this makes sense since most of what we've seen since the advent of new consoles is "prettier versions of old formulas").
I wonder if it will get anything below 8/10 from major websites or magazines that people follow. Or getting something like 60 or 70 by critics on Metacritic. I cant even imagine the meltdown it will cause.
But I think those big websites will just give 8/10 or even 9/10 to avoid all the fuss. People care too much about scores on internet.
In general all these sites are way too easy with giving these high scores to mediocre games.
I hate when people who have only played Fallout 3 make statements about the whole series...
In general all these sites are way too easy with giving these high scores to mediocre games.
I agree to this. Mediocre games get higher grades than they should just because of their popularity/publisher/being AAA titles(though Ive seen few exceptions to this). This will also be true for the high scores FO4 will get.
Cut content, insane dlc prices etc is EA, Activision and Ubisoft... those companies have far more haters than fans.
So even if the game is bad it should still get high scores? Not fanboyish at all...
So even if the game is bad it should still get high scores? Not fanboyish at all...
I don't think so. But that's how these gaming websites work.
We all know that Fallout 4 (even if will have all the flaws we fear for) won't be worse than Assasins Creed or Need for Speed.
Gametrailers gives Need for Speed a 83, which is obviously ridiculous. But now they can't give Fallout anything lower than that because that would be weird.
Gamespot gives Assasins a 9. How can they then give a game with 20 times more dialogue lines, bigger world, more gameplay, without microtransacrions, not a yearly milk release etc something lower?
The gaming websites shoot themselves in the foot with giving too high scores. It's not that I think that Fallout 4 should be getting high scores either way, it's that compared to other games that get too high scores it should at least get scores that are as high.
Gametrailers gives Need for Speed a 83, which is obviously ridiculous. But now they can't give Fallout anything lower than that because that would be weird.
Gamespot gives Assasins a 9. How can they then give a game with 20 times more dialogue lines, bigger world, more gameplay, without microtransacrions, not a yearly milk release etc something lower?