Trump wins

1. The point still stands
2. You mean the evidence Ive now had to obviously waste my time as no one bothered to look at it, shown refutations for that show that being skeptical of the "world ending for realz u guise!!11!!!1!
Here lemme put some more taxes and regulations on you there everything is fine now ;^) "
Isnt that unreasonable? But nah keep forming non arguments, ignoring my evidence and calling me stupid for being skeptical and say I believe the earth is flat. That attitudes worked out soooo great for the left recently please by all means, keep doing it.

I said it was silly once given the facts.
Gave an explanation on why someone wouldn't take your posts seriously and then asked you a question.

You had a bitch fit and started saying how no one watched your evidence a d Ghent rambled on for about two sentences about the left.
 
And I explained why its not when you dont stay in a liberal echo chamber

Okay fine.
I'll watch your evidence.

It better not waste my time through

Exit.You wasted my time, both links are from Stefan Molyneoux.
You can't even find more than one shit tier Youtuber to back your claim.
 
Last edited:
Okay fine.
I'll watch your evidence.

It better not waste my time through

Exit.You wasted my time, both links are from Stefan Molyneoux.
You can't even find more than one shit tier Youtuber to back your claim.
Yay another retard who cant read video descriptions to find his sources
I should just start straight up copy pasting transcripts with the sources dumped at the end so yall dont have this knee jerk meme excuse not to bother even giving the information within a chance.
Call me what you want bht at least I watch John Oliver from time to timen o confirm hes wrong and a liar
 
You're a retard who doesn't believe that driving a car down the road is doing some harm by warming up the planet.
Not an argument

Youre a big dumb poopy head for not agreeing with me >:(
I dont have to justify this statement and im just gonna ignore all your evidence without looking at it to show how correct I am
Haha looks like I win again ;^)
 
Do you think then that the increasing temperature s at a vapid rate since the industrial era is a better argument?
I think the mass of evidence Ive provided that youve refused to look at beacuse xyz is a lot better than no argument at all.

For real though as youve made it clear you A: Dont have any interest in forming a real argument based on proof B: Refuse to put in the bare fucking minimum effort of actually looking at the other side's evidence and attacking their reasoning afterwards instead of personal attacks right out of the gate and C: Offer no evidence to your claims instead offering "you dont automatically believe ____!?!?!?!?!? Youre stupid!" and other attacks with no substance.... I think this conversation is done.
I mean feel free to totally BTFO my beliefs and attack all the things that led me to believe these things instead of me. At least when I call people retards its after I show them why.
 
You're a retard who doesn't believe that driving a car down the road is doing some harm by warming up the planet.
Do you drive a car? 'Cause I know a shitload of retards who do believe in anthropogenic global warming while still driving their car down the road. These people should be shot for saying one thing and doing another. Don't you agree?
 
Theres already a climate change thread where you can post all the NPR and The Guardian articles you want.
Its a debate Ive already had and dont feel like arguing with some randy in the Trump thread about so Im gonna post these videos no one will bother to watch anyway and leave it at that


And just a heads up if youre like Bux, not watching the video and/or its sources in the description and just dismissing it immediatly is not an argument.

I already kicked your ass in the climate change thread so shut up sonny
 
Do you drive a car? 'Cause I know a shitload of retards who do believe in anthropogenic global warming while still driving their car down the road. These people should be shot for saying one thing and doing another. Don't you agree?

I don't and I have no interest.
I don't really agree, but I think self regulation is key.

If a journey is like an hour and a half in the car, then yes, a car is very useful.

If you're going 10 minutes down the road, then other means of transportation is better.

I do see how a car is vital through for someone living in the countryside as opposed to a City.
 
@Vergil

203_co2-graph-021116.jpeg

Global sea level rose about 17 centimeters (6.7 inches) in the last century. The rate in the last decade, however, is nearly double that of the last century.
All three major global surface temperature reconstructions show that Earth has warmed since 1880. ,Most of this warming has occurred since the 1970s, with the 20 warmest years having occurred since 1981 and with all 10 of the warmest years occurring in the past 12 years. Even though the 2000s witnessed a solar output decline resulting in an unusually deep solar minimum in 2007-2009, surface temperatures continue to increase.
Global warming is melting the Arctic and glaciers worldwide.
The oceans have absorbed much of this increased heat, with the top 700 meters (about 2,300 feet) of ocean showing warming of 0.302 degrees Fahrenheit since 1969
The Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets have decreased in mass. Data from NASA's Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment show Greenland lost 150 to 250 cubic kilometers (36 to 60 cubic miles) of ice per year between 2002 and 2006, while Antarctica lost about 152 cubic kilometers (36 cubic miles) of ice between 2002 and 2005.
The number of record high temperature events in the United States has been increasing, while the number of record low temperature events has been decreasing, since 1950. The U.S. has also witnessed increasing numbers of intense rainfall events
Since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, the acidity of surface ocean waters has increased by about 30 percent. This increase is the result of humans emitting more carbon dioxide into the atmosphere and hence more being absorbed into the oceans. The amount of carbon dioxide absorbed by the upper layer of the oceans is increasing by about 2 billion tons per year.
Satellite observations reveal that the amount of spring snow cover in the Northern Hemisphere has decreased over the past five decades and that the snow is melting earlier.
A link to the page where I got all that evidence: http://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/

Negatives of Global warming
  • Warmer climes will encourage migration of disease-bearing insects like mosquitoes and malaria is already appearing in places it hasn’t been seen before.
  • Polar Melting: detrimental effects include loss of polar bear habitat and increased mobile ice hazards to shipping.
  • Ocean Acidification: this process is caused by additional CO2 being absorbed in the water, and may have severe destabilising effects on the entire oceanic food-chain.
  • Melting Glaciers: The effects of glaciers melting are largely detrimental, the principle impact being that many millions of people (one-sixth of the world’s population) depend on fresh water supplied each year by natural spring melt and regrowth cycles and those water supplies – drinking water, agriculture – may fail.
  • Sea Level Rise: Many parts of the world are low-lying and will be severely affected by modest sea rises. Rice paddies are being inundated with salt water, which destroys the crops. Seawater is contaminating rivers as it mixes with fresh water further upstream, and aquifers are becoming polluted.
  • Economic: The Stern report made clear the overall pattern of economic distress, and while the specific numbers may be contested, the costs of climate change were far in excess of the costs of preventing it. Certain scenarios projected in the IPCC AR4 report would witness massive migration as low-lying countries were flooded. Disruptions to global trade, transport, energy supplies and labour markets, banking and finance, investment and insurance, would all wreak havoc on the stability of both developed and developing nations. Markets would endure increased volatility and institutional investors such as pension funds and insurance companies would experience considerable difficulty.
    Developing countries, some of which are already embroiled in military conflict, may be drawn into larger and more protracted disputes over water, energy supplies or food, all of which may disrupt economic growth at a time when developing countries are beset by more egregious manifestations of climate change. It is widely accepted that the detrimental effects of climate change will be visited largely on the countries least equipped to adapt, socially or economically.
  • A link to the article where I got that info: https://www.skepticalscience.com/global-warming-positives-negatives.htm
 
Its been a long time, do you even still have that opinion anymore?
203_co2-graph-021116.jpeg

Global sea level rose about 17 centimeters (6.7 inches) in the last century. The rate in the last decade, however, is nearly double that of the last century.
All three major global surface temperature reconstructions show that Earth has warmed since 1880. ,Most of this warming has occurred since the 1970s, with the 20 warmest years having occurred since 1981 and with all 10 of the warmest years occurring in the past 12 years. Even though the 2000s witnessed a solar output decline resulting in an unusually deep solar minimum in 2007-2009, surface temperatures continue to increase.
Global warming is melting the Arctic and glaciers worldwide.
The oceans have absorbed much of this increased heat, with the top 700 meters (about 2,300 feet) of ocean showing warming of 0.302 degrees Fahrenheit since 1969
The Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets have decreased in mass. Data from NASA's Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment show Greenland lost 150 to 250 cubic kilometers (36 to 60 cubic miles) of ice per year between 2002 and 2006, while Antarctica lost about 152 cubic kilometers (36 cubic miles) of ice between 2002 and 2005.
The number of record high temperature events in the United States has been increasing, while the number of record low temperature events has been decreasing, since 1950. The U.S. has also witnessed increasing numbers of intense rainfall events
Since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, the acidity of surface ocean waters has increased by about 30 percent. This increase is the result of humans emitting more carbon dioxide into the atmosphere and hence more being absorbed into the oceans. The amount of carbon dioxide absorbed by the upper layer of the oceans is increasing by about 2 billion tons per year.
Satellite observations reveal that the amount of spring snow cover in the Northern Hemisphere has decreased over the past five decades and that the snow is melting earlier.
A link to the page where I got all that evidence: http://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/

Negatives of Global warming
  • Warmer climes will encourage migration of disease-bearing insects like mosquitoes and malaria is already appearing in places it hasn’t been seen before.
  • Polar Melting: detrimental effects include loss of polar bear habitat and increased mobile ice hazards to shipping.
  • Ocean Acidification: this process is caused by additional CO2 being absorbed in the water, and may have severe destabilising effects on the entire oceanic food-chain.
  • Melting Glaciers: The effects of glaciers melting are largely detrimental, the principle impact being that many millions of people (one-sixth of the world’s population) depend on fresh water supplied each year by natural spring melt and regrowth cycles and those water supplies – drinking water, agriculture – may fail.
  • Sea Level Rise: Many parts of the world are low-lying and will be severely affected by modest sea rises. Rice paddies are being inundated with salt water, which destroys the crops. Seawater is contaminating rivers as it mixes with fresh water further upstream, and aquifers are becoming polluted.
  • Economic: The Stern report made clear the overall pattern of economic distress, and while the specific numbers may be contested, the costs of climate change were far in excess of the costs of preventing it. Certain scenarios projected in the IPCC AR4 report would witness massive migration as low-lying countries were flooded. Disruptions to global trade, transport, energy supplies and labour markets, banking and finance, investment and insurance, would all wreak havoc on the stability of both developed and developing nations. Markets would endure increased volatility and institutional investors such as pension funds and insurance companies would experience considerable difficulty.
    Developing countries, some of which are already embroiled in military conflict, may be drawn into larger and more protracted disputes over water, energy supplies or food, all of which may disrupt economic growth at a time when developing countries are beset by more egregious manifestations of climate change. It is widely accepted that the detrimental effects of climate change will be visited largely on the countries least equipped to adapt, socially or economically.
  • A link to the article where I got that info: https://www.skepticalscience.com/global-warming-positives-negatives.htm
 
Does this mean I can now spam the stuff Ive posted all of you havent bothered to look at or do I not get that luxury?

btw Im on mobile so excuse the lack of long sprawling paragraphs but at first glance Id just like to say at first lookover:
First source is a government agency that gets direct compensation for going along with the current theory.

Second glosses over the other periods of heating and cooling and fails to explain them which doesnt help the argument that its mankinds fault.
 
Does this mean I can now spam the stuff Ive posted all of you havent bothered to look at or do I not get that luxury?

btw Im on mobile so excuse the lack of long sprawling paragraphs but at first glance Id just like to say at first lookover:
First source is a government agency that gets direct compensation for going along with the current theory.

Second glosses over the other periods of heating and cooling and fails to explain them which doesnt help the argument that its mankinds fault.
Just because you post a YouTube video as proof doesn't make it right. I can show you proof that the Holocaust never happened or that the holy grail is in Tennessee. But proof, and ACCURATE proof are two different things. You are showing us inaccurate, unconfirmed, non peer reviewed proof.
Also, you aren't as smart as you think you are. Try watching something other than fox news for your information. Inb4 I'm labelled a liberal bleeding heart.
 
Just because you post a YouTube video as proof doesn't make it right. I can show you proof that the Holocaust never happened or that the holy grail is in Tennessee. But proof, and ACCURATE proof are two different things. You are showing us inaccurate, unconfirmed, non peer reviewed proof.
Also, you aren't as smart as you think you are. Try watching something other than fox news for your information. Inb4 I'm labelled a liberal bleeding heart.
Says the man(?) who wont even look at it
I dont like Fox either but nice assumption
Now you gonna make any refutation or continue shitposting in a derailed threac?
 
Back
Top