Dreadnought said:
Smartass, eh?
Your point? Oh, wait, you don't have one.
Fail to pay attention to context, much? Popular usage of each element in fiction was the important element of the discussion, in context with discussing 50's fiction styles. Sorry I didn't put it clearly for those too retarded to understand that I was discussing fiction styles and what was popular when. But hey, congratulations on figuring out that we are discussing electric guitars and synthesizers, and congratulations on being able to look things up. You still fail at the reading comprehension part, however.
So I don't give a fuck about when they were invented, only when they had widespread popular use that seeped into fiction styles. As in, the 80's are known as the synth years, and the 60-70's were more known for the prevalance of the electric guitar as the lead instrument instead of merely being part of big bands. If you had bothered to read the article about the electric guitar you posted instead of just posting it and thusly wasting my time, as it clearly details when electric guitars were advanced enough in construction to create many of the associations and effects commonly related to what is considered the basis for musical weaponry.
For this to even remotely approach Fallout, it would be something a bit more Buddy Holly than Cheap Trick, in the case of electric guitars, so a guitar as a sonic weapon would not quite fit in with the fiction style of Fallout. Buddy Holly didn't rape his Fender Stratocaster, which is exactly what the bullshit around "sonic weapons" infers, that some greasy thrash metal gimp is raping the strings to make it painful, much like the zither scene in the wu xia spoof Kung-Fu Hustle.
In the case of synths, I find it amusing that when the schematics were published so anyone could make one since the 70's, it gave rise to a shitload of groups with the synth as a core in, guess what, the 80's. Speaking of your ability to post links demonstrating your inability to read, you might want to read the synth entry for when movies started to use synths more, and when synths were possible to be moved from studios. They only existed in studios before solid state re-engineering in the 70's, because they weren't really portable, at least not in the popular frame of the 80's. Then there's the whole issue about how it wasn't until the mid-70's that synths became polyphonic. Do not worry if you don't understand that word, given your reading ability, you wouldn't have to worry about the differences between monophonic or polyphonic. I will just make it simple for you - imagine playing a guitar with just one note at a time, and that is monophonic. To put it simpler for you, since I have this feeling I have to, the best musical complexity you could achieve on something monophonic in a live performance is a single-note series like Mary Had A Little Lamb. You just completely blew past the part with the Prophet-5, which has a historic footnote for a reason that anyone familiar with synths could probably tell you offhand, and that makes this just even more amusing. Actually, what is even more amusing is that you try to bullshit someone who worked on synth construction as they were learning how to engineer electronics.
And I mention Cheap Trick for a purpose, given the two animated movies with their music as background, and serve as part of the inspiration for others to create "sonic instrument weapons", and I must note that one of the movies is post-apocalyptic of sorts. Let us hope you're competent enough in using Wiki to research that much, as that seems to be the only part of this discussion where you even begin to approach "relevance", and poorly so at that.
And no, don't bother posting about it, because I already know about it. I just want you to develop a clue.