What suddenly no longer exists

that theory constantly gets updated due to somebody noticing an error in it and it's actually called a theory not a hypothesis can you belive that??
and yeah Maxwell's equations look up the one from Amper's it's in an inverse relation to a shift in time, at least partially..

and yeah finishing a technical school around here gave a university grade proffesion education and college grade all around education a kind of hybrid that is now gone due to EU entry and education standarisation-reforms that were done round 10 years back by country's authorities during eu entry.
So you might say I'm uneducated.. maybe I am.. or maybe more than 12 years after finishing my education my knowledge got somehow outdated. Especially in evolution theory as I never paid too much attention to it, as at the time I was beeing taught about it, it looked pretty stupid/unrealistic. So the theory moved on.. big deal.. It's not that I'd need it anyway, however it's better for me to stay away from future disscusions like this.
O Lawd, now you don't even know what a theory is...
Where's the time evolution of the magnetic field in Ampere's law?
I'll tell you where: Nowhere. Ampere's law tells you that the curl of the magnetic field is equal to the flux plus the derivative of the electrical field. What you're thinking of is Faraday's law of induction, where the negative derivative of the magnetic field is equal to the curl of the electrical field.
Electrodynamics stayed the same over the past hundred years. If you forgot your shit, don't go barging into threads with your scattered semi-knowledge and just claim stuff. Read up on it first, actually try to understand what you're talking about, and, for fuck's sake, DON'T CLAIM AUTHORITY when you can't be sure that you actually got your stuff right.
 
I was talking about Maxwell's approach to Amper's equations i obviously can't copy/paste them here because forum probably does not allow certain symbols it has..

You know what forget it.. I've boiled some of your blood , you've boiled some of mine, I'm going to grab a beer now , and watch you all spitting acid on me:p
 
Last edited:
I was talking about Maxwell's approach to Amper's equations i obviously can't copy/paste them here because forum probably does not allow certain symbols it has..
Just use curl (or delta x B), d/dt, and stuff like that. Now I'm really looking forward to what you have in mind...
 
Sorry for mentioning Evolution zegh8578, it seems to have accidentally caused this thread to devolve turn to shit posting.
 
I like how he said he was trolling and then just kept on doing the same thing right after.

or maybe more than 12 years after finishing my education my knowledge got somehow outdated. Especially in evolution theory as I never paid too much attention to it, as at the time I was beeing taught about it, it looked pretty stupid/unrealistic. So the theory moved on.. big deal.

Yes, the theory moved on in 10 years. What? No. More has probably happened to the theory of Evolution than Electrodynamics over the 150 years since evolution was first formulated, but the main idea is the same, only our understanding of details about the mechanics of it has changed. That's why you see all these happy retarded quote miners finding a scientists who said, gasp, Darwin was wrong!
 
Seriously, electrodynamics didn't change at all in the past 100 years or so. It had been supplemented with a quantum field theory, but for classical applications it's the same.
He might mean that dynamo theory and how the Earth's magnetic field works has changed. That is true, and dynamo theory is still in work as computational power is growing ever larger.
I can't imagine anyone ever claimed magnetised liquid iron in the Earth's core as the source of the magnetic field, though.
 
7749e5c869.jpg

abcd49284bcc9027f05cae75f9c99188.jpg
 
It's like when people go "How can eyes have evolved? They just popped out of the skin? I don't buy it." Well, apparently you don't read it either. READ IT!!! THERE'S DETAILED EXPLANATIONS IN WRITING D: "nah, don't wanna. But I don't buy it!"

Just yesterday, someone wanted me to "prove" that the Americas had history before whites came (yes yes, this is politics+racism more than science misunderstanding - but same basic mindset of - - - ) - expecting ME to just divulge the entire history of northern and southern America in a fuckin Youtube-post!? What are people thinking... ?

And this is how they are raised, a lot of people - they think knowledge and education comes in anecdotal comments - or easyer: By just closing ones eyes and humming softly
 
Lemme just state that anyone dismissing science out of sheer ignorance deserves a brickface (that's basically like breakfast, but instead of food on a plate it's a brick to the face).
 
It's like when people go "How can eyes have evolved? They just popped out of the skin? I don't buy it." Well, apparently you don't read it either. READ IT!!! THERE'S DETAILED EXPLANATIONS IN WRITING D: "nah, don't wanna. But I don't buy it!"

Just yesterday, someone wanted me to "prove" that the Americas had history before whites came (yes yes, this is politics+racism more than science misunderstanding - but same basic mindset of - - - ) - expecting ME to just divulge the entire history of northern and southern America in a fuckin Youtube-post!? What are people thinking... ?

And this is how they are raised, a lot of people - they think knowledge and education comes in anecdotal comments - or easyer: By just closing ones eyes and humming softly

There's an irritating mentality that I don't understand, am always blindsided by and never really consider to be a thing.

Simply that people equate with being able to state things by definitively by rote, and doing so confidently, is the same as being learned. If you don't have answers then it invalidates your position by default.

From time, to time, I'm reminded of this mindset. But I always forget. It's just too alien for me to consider.
 
There's an irritating mentality that I don't understand, am always blindsided by and never really consider to be a thing.

Simply that people equate with being able to state things by definitively by rote, and doing so confidently, is the same as being learned. If you don't have answers then it invalidates your position by default.

From time, to time, I'm reminded of this mindset. But I always forget. It's just too alien for me to consider.

Not too sound like too much of an armchair psychologist - I think that mentality comes straight from home, and starts at an early age, when the brain begins to sort out the difference between fiction and fact, what is what.
Me, when I was a toddler, and asked why the sky is blue, my mother would tell me the exact truth to HER best ability "Eh.......... well.... it has to do with... vapor, or something... I have NO idea, maybe it says in the encyclopedia... ?"
With this, I learned a valuable lesson - for life - that authority (my mom at the time) does not have the answers SIMPLY by being an authority. Authority, confidence, loudness, does not equal holding answers. I learned that answers are often hard to find, they require effort, and they may take a long time to explain.

Compare to some parents who actually joke a question away; why is the sky blue? "Because you're stupid! HARDY HAR!" This kills curiousity, and you get these dipshits who never even wonder about what or why or where, clueless for life, and fine with it.

Or the worst culprit - when daddy has ALLLL the answers. ALL of them - with authority and with confidence: "The sky is blue because God made it blue. Now eat your dinner."
 
Them balls aside, chimpanzees have some terrifying muscles... Their fur tends to obscure it, but
3b98cb836fd480bb7ef3f2f149bfeea9.jpg

Rip your dick off? Like plucking a flower. Rip your face off? It would probably have to grab on hard, and make a little effort
 
I still want to see Anderson Silva go up against an average chimp, it'd be interesting to see if he could last a round.

Also, maaaan why do genitals have to be so incredibly ugly?
 
9/11 never happened. It was just a big hoax. There weren't any "Twin Towers". It was just a cover-up to start elimination of Muslims so called "terrorist" allegedly doing attacks on western people for a community called Alkaida which never existed. This really surprised me when I found that out.
 
Back
Top