quietfanatic
Ancient One
If America interfered with Antarctica, which is mostly protected by Australia, then the Greens would go for them and there would be an international outcry. It is very unlikely anyway, because they already have Alaska to screw up. Canada is closer as well (although they might not take too kindly to being annexed).
I must not have been clear enough. I think that the economy will be slowed by taking in the Eastern nations, but at least cheaper wages my stimulate foreign investment and bring them up to par.
They have a massive population which could provide more professional soldiers for a standing army. A Turkish friend of mine was telling me how difficult it was to get into university and higher education. I know it is intensely competitive in Europe as well, but I would assume your average Belgian citizen would have a higher chance of gaining higher-paying employment than a Turkish one. The higher population and economic status would thus lead to a larger army.
We don't need massive armies anymore. America doesn't need such a large one. But they have one. The need for a sense of security will always motivate people to defend themselves, even if it is in a preventative way. It may be irrational, but its there. Economic power is what is really important now, but even that is linked to defense, with arms manufacturers forming a vital part of many economies.
I think that the structure of the caste system will not be that much of a barrier for economic growth and that the dollar will win. Tradition will not be abandoned, but the elite who controls things will be more interested in gaining profit and keeping people happy. Social class is becoming much less important all the time.
What is communism then? It is what they call themselves. I think that they still suffer from too much government corruption and interference currently, to overtake the US, but they can set up the apparatus for democracy and free market capitalism, and slow and steadily become the most powerful economic bloc.
Only mostly. The US will have to get closer to South America if it is to compete with the rest of the world. Russia will still have the problems with government, the fact that it is so huge and that many of the Islamic groups will either want to secede from the federation, or else just stay and continue fighting.
This is a super-optimistic theory based on the the premise that greed and understanding will win out over stupidity and selfishness. Maybe a contradiction in terms, but you have to have hope. Less optimistic theories could be much shorter.
It is also clear that I know next to nothing about economics and am assuming allot of things.
Jebus said:The European economie won't grow because of the cheaper labour available in the Eastern states.
I must not have been clear enough. I think that the economy will be slowed by taking in the Eastern nations, but at least cheaper wages my stimulate foreign investment and bring them up to par.
Why would we need Turkey for that? 750 million people live here already. Or are the Turks more militaristic somehow, perhaps?
They have a massive population which could provide more professional soldiers for a standing army. A Turkish friend of mine was telling me how difficult it was to get into university and higher education. I know it is intensely competitive in Europe as well, but I would assume your average Belgian citizen would have a higher chance of gaining higher-paying employment than a Turkish one. The higher population and economic status would thus lead to a larger army.
We don't need massive armies anymore. America doesn't need such a large one. But they have one. The need for a sense of security will always motivate people to defend themselves, even if it is in a preventative way. It may be irrational, but its there. Economic power is what is really important now, but even that is linked to defense, with arms manufacturers forming a vital part of many economies.
I think that the structure of the caste system will not be that much of a barrier for economic growth and that the dollar will win. Tradition will not be abandoned, but the elite who controls things will be more interested in gaining profit and keeping people happy. Social class is becoming much less important all the time.
First of all, present day China is about as communistic as my left shoe.
Secondly, China already is an economical superpower, and will most likely become as powerfull as the USA in the near future. They might even reach the level of the EU within ten to fifteen years...
What is communism then? It is what they call themselves. I think that they still suffer from too much government corruption and interference currently, to overtake the US, but they can set up the apparatus for democracy and free market capitalism, and slow and steadily become the most powerful economic bloc.
From then on, your post becomes quite irrational indeed.
Only mostly. The US will have to get closer to South America if it is to compete with the rest of the world. Russia will still have the problems with government, the fact that it is so huge and that many of the Islamic groups will either want to secede from the federation, or else just stay and continue fighting.
This is a super-optimistic theory based on the the premise that greed and understanding will win out over stupidity and selfishness. Maybe a contradiction in terms, but you have to have hope. Less optimistic theories could be much shorter.
It is also clear that I know next to nothing about economics and am assuming allot of things.