What's Trump up to now?

I'm aware of the process. The point is him going back and forth like he can't decided who to piss off. People on Twitter knee-jerked on the initial news saying it was another media lie, then they were told it was Conway who said it, and they were pissed. Then a short while later Trump comes out and says otherwise. His team needs to figure out a consistent message. His supporters can't figure out if there will be a wall, deportations, or internment camps.
 
Maybe he's simply like a child who wanders into the middle of a presidency and wants to know ...
 
This is pretty cool, Trump went to the NY Times for an interview.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/22/us/politics/donald-trump-visit.html
The gist of it: Obama is a pretty cool guy, climate change could be man-made, prosecuting the Clintons is not a good idea, touching the First Amendment and suing newspapers for libel is also terrible, disavows the alt-right HAIL TRUMP crowd, wants to make peace between Israel and Palestine, wants to take care of Syria.
 
This is pretty cool, Trump went to the NY Times for an interview.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/22/us/politics/donald-trump-visit.html
The gist of it: Obama is a pretty cool guy, climate change could be man-made, prosecuting the Clintons is not a good idea, touching the First Amendment and suing newspapers for libel is also terrible, disavows the alt-right HAIL TRUMP crowd, wants to make peace between Israel and Palestine, wants to take care of Syria.
We should wait for the Breitbart article though. Just in case!
 
In what way? Is he implying that he wants to continue the shitty policies of protecting America's proxy rebels or...?
He says he has different views than anybody else, that's all. We'll see. He could possibly cooperate with Russia on that one.
 
Yeah, but what are you saying to the fact that Russia is killing more Syrian civilians than the US ever did since the bombing campaign started? I mean both have a habit of hitting schools and hostpitals ... but I have read about aprox. 900 kills by the US and more then 3 000 by Russians.
Maybe they should use German guiding systems. We hav zero civilian kills so far.
 
Honestly, what really worries me in todays culture, how 'mannerism', is really going down the gutter. It's like people don't even pretend anymore to be 'friendly'. And not just in politics, it's everywhere at this point, young, old you name it, so really it's not just a generation thing.
Homo homini lupus. :look:
Leave Munich, seriously. People tend to going nuts in metropolitan environment, the real deal urban psychosis, you'll find much more friendly neighborhood in rural areas. I kid you not:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3230535/
Nearly a century of research has shown higher risk of mental disorder among persons living in urban versus rural areas. Epidemiologic research has documented that associations between particular features of the urban environment, such as concentrated disadvantage, residential segregation and social norms, contribute to the risk of mental illness. We propose that changes in DNA methylation may be one potential mechanism through which features of the urban environment contribute to psychopathology. Recent advances in animal models and human correlation studies suggest DNA methylation as a promising mechanism that can explain how the environment “gets under the skin.”
 
Yeah, but what are you saying to the fact that Russia is killing more Syrian civilians than the US ever did since the bombing campaign started? I mean both have a habit of hitting schools and hostpitals ... but I have read about aprox. 900 kills by the US and more then 3 000 by Russians.
Maybe they should use German guiding systems. We hav zero civilian kills so far.

Meanwhile the Russians are doing their best to get shit done over there. Half of those "schools" and "hospitals" are occupied by opposing forces, same deal we've seen in Donbass.
 
Homo homini lupus. :look:
Leave Munich, seriously. People tend to going nuts in metropolitan environment, the real deal urban psychosis, you'll find much more friendly neighborhood in rural areas. I kid you not:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3230535/

Living in a either smaller town or village or rural area can be nice. However, in my case, only if certain basic things are met. It can't be 'banjo playing territory' - rural. A town that's sort of not very lively isn't necessarily a nice place either.

But it's true what Crni_Vuk says, people are becoming more dickish all the time. It's strange. Like that movie Body Snatchers, except that instead of weird alien cocoons people are turning into a-holes.

I'm glad Trump will change this by injecting the ideals of love and caring into people's craniums. :???:
 
Last edited:
So funny how everyone's salty over the results.

The left can't deal with the fact they lost, and contest the Rust Belt state as well as the rules of the EC itself.

Trump then adds fuel to the fire by, again, producing widespread voter fraud out of thin air with no evidence to back him up at all.

It truly is a circus.
 
Well there's this: https://covr.sos.ca.gov/Home/MainForm

x9o5kctio80y.jpg


Can't believe the mainstream media, full of shit and can't write the truth without twisting it like the news my buddy got and my father found the real news for some accident that happened. It's because they don't get paid off or have a reason to push an agenda.
 
Okay? actually clicking on this link, the site requires you to declare that you are a US citizen and 18+ in order to be eligible. Yes, you can lie then and there, but nothing tells us there is no check being made at the actual booth. No outside source that I saw has actually went ahead and said they had evidence, or even suspicions of widespread fraud.

If you wanna claim that more than 2 million illegal immigrants registered illegally and voted Democat, you gotta advance some pretty damn solid proof.
 
Fucking stocks went through the roof. .

Not all stocks. At least, not over here. :irked:

Oh, Trump gathering money to counter the vote recount. How 'democratic' of him. I'm beginning to believe that there actually could be a civil war or at least major civil unrest in US in the next 4 years, maybe even within a year.

Btw, I take it you guys are totally ok with the US presidential election system? Over here in my country we have no EC, direct choice by the people 1 vote is 1 vote, two rounds of voting, for first round prez candidates from different parties have debates on tv and all get to have their say about things.

For second round it's the top two candidates so there is no talk of smaller candidates sabotaging the election for the bigger candidates. Also no electronic voting at all, you just draw your candidates number on a piece of paper and drop it in a box. There are many places where you can vote, for example in big grocery stores so basically no lines at all. No need to register to vote, everyone can vote. Nobody is disqualified from voting AFAIK. You vote early over many days or on election day.

Voting percentage for last prez election here was about 69% which was the lowest ever for some reason. The final two candidates were a guy from the right-wing coalition party who won and a gay guy from the green party.

Wow such long post.
 
Last edited:
Nevermind, elections and voting is boring anyway.

Where's AskWazzup, haven't seen him around lately. Wonder what the feelings are in the Baltics right now.
 
The two turn system is pretty obviously superior to the american or canadian method by my accounts, since it doesn't give any region a disproportional amont of influence in the election; you need to reach out to everyone, as you should in a republic/democracy

It also tends to increase voter participation I found; France has a whopping 80% of its population voting in presidential elections, with a (I think) all time high of something like 85-86%. Compare that to US elections whi have a hard time breaking the 60% line these days. If memory serves, 2016 saw a mere 54% people voting. That's just embarassing IMO.
 
Back
Top