What's your MBTI?

I just find it funny how introverts are posting these results here. I took the test three times on three different days, and got the the same results each time. Anyways:

ISTJ - "Trustee". Decisiveness in practical affairs. Guardian of time- honored institutions. Dependable. 11.6% of total population.

Introverted (I) 76.67% Extroverted (E) 23.33%
Sensing (S) 52.63% Intuitive (N) 47.37%
Thinking (T) 79.41% Feeling (F) 20.59%
Judging (J) 72.73% Perceiving (P) 27.27%

responsible, planner, private, loner tendencies, perfectionist, organized, detail oriented, organized, would rather be friendless than jobless, realistic, observer, clean, focused, does not talk about feelings, finisher, punctual, private, does not appreciate strangeness, not adventurous, not spontaneous, follows the rules, dutiful, avoids mistakes, conventional, likes solitude, insensitive to the hardships of others, prepared, anti-tattoos, things rules are important, cautious, security seeking, prepares for worst case scenarios, logical, analytical, does not accept apologies easily, hard working

Insensitive to the hardships of others: This is particularly true, for the most part, I'm not insensitive to everyone ... I think.

anti-tattoos I'm getting one this weekend so I don't where the hell that came from.

data analyst, scientist, researcher, engineer, financial planner, statistician, office worker, government employee, lab technician, nuclear engineer, office manager, biomedical engineer, account manager, ceo, investment banker, analyst, academic, systems analyst, pharmacy technician, network admin, genetics researcher, research assistant, strategist

I'm currently a data analyst.
I'm going to school for physics.

I guess it's pretty accurate, overall.

Edit: I think I'm more of a compromise between this and INTJ, which makes sense considering there's about 4% between the stats.
 
boer_kameel said:
if this is to be a long-term career choice

Ha, name one assassin in history who was not apprehended shortly after his famous attack.

John Wilkes Booth - Caught
Gavrilo Princip - Caught
Lee Harvey Oswald - Caught (grassy knoll is speculative)
Guy who shot Lennon - Caught
Guy who shot James Garfield - Caught
Guy who tried to kill Reagan - Caught
 
fa2241 said:
Lee Harvey Oswald
AHA AHAHAHAHHAHAH!
I'm far from a conspiracy nut, but really it's nearly impossible that Oswald shot JFK, at least alone. If Carlos Hanthcock can't repeat his results there's no way he did it in the first place.
 
ESTJ- "Administrator". Much in touch with the external environment. Very responsible. Pillar of strength. 8.7% of total population.
organized, group oriented, focused, conventional, leader, emotionally stable, anal, attention seeking, planner, realistic, fearless, responsible, finisher, decisive, norm following, respects authority, punctual, hard working, stiff, self confident, thinks rules and regulations are important, follows the rules, clean, outgoing, social, content, does not like being alone, normal, regular, does not like weird or strange people / things - intolerant of differences, strict, disciplined, aggressive, assertive, content, happy, proper, formal, strict with self, meticulous, strong sense of purpose
favored careers:
executive, ceo, supervisor, business consultant, manager, strategist, financial planner, business person, office manager, public relations manager, international business specialist, business analyst, management consultant, operations manager, loan officer, lawyer, marketing, sports management, government employee, investment banker
Seems a lot like me, and what I want to do. Managing ftw!
 
M-26-7 said:
fa2241 said:
Lee Harvey Oswald
AHA AHAHAHAHHAHAH!
I'm far from a conspiracy nut, but really it's nearly impossible that Oswald shot JFK, at least alone. If Carlos Hanthcock can't repeat his results there's no way he did it in the first place.

Well, there's always beginner's luck, but that's beside the point. My point is, no assassin was ever famous and got away with it, unless he was on the winning side of a revolution or a similar circumstance.

Also, often times the assassination is more famous than the assassin, think about that.
 
Same here; We still did it though ;)

Um, Jack the Ripper? Though I guess he was more of a killer than an assassin.
 
Can we blow some life in this? I got a good laugh going through it again, and find myself wondering if NMA still attracts INTP/INTJ mostly. With the odd journalist.

Starseeker: I agree upon the incorrectness of this test when the questions aren't answered "truthfully", or more correct, the answerer doesn't understand the question.
But I don't underestimate the analytical skills of this odd bunch of people, as the results seem to point out: most agree with their result. Odd journalists aside.
 
ENTP, and my personal favorites of the career choices :lol: :

dictator, international spy, fighter pilot, strategist, private detective, fbi agent, cia agent, assassin.

Cool, those sound rather exiting :P

Altho real life is probably more something like: it consultant "Have you tried turning it off and on again?"

Nonagon said:
Ha, name one assassin in history who was not apprehended shortly after his famous attack.

That's rather a contradiction of terms tho, successful assassins can't ever be famous otherwise they wouldn't be successful.

It's like, who is the greater spy in history. Afraid to tell you you will never ever know. Same with most spies that are at lest minimally competent. If you ever know about them is because they were a failure.
 
oh god i hate those tests.
i had forgotten all about them, but they went around like forest-fires on the liveleak forums some years back iirc and also an old dinosaur forum.

i got a bad flashback feeling just seeing those abbreviations :D

Gonzalez, "Garbo" was a pretty good spy, but best known post mortem i guess.
 
INTP

Introverted (I) 77.78% Extroverted (E) 22.22%
Intuitive (N) 56.1% Sensing (S) 43.9%
Thinking (T) 52.38% Feeling (F) 47.62%
Perceiving (P) 65.52% Judging (J) 34.48%

INTP - "Architect". Greatest precision in thought and language. Can readily discern contradictions and inconsistencies. The world exists primarily to be understood. 3.3% of total population.


loner, more interested in intellectual pursuits than relationships or family, wrestles with the meaninglessness of existence, likes esoteric things, disorganized, messy, likes science fiction, can be lonely, observer, private, can't describe feelings easily, detached, likes solitude, not revealing, unemotional, rule breaker, avoidant, familiar with the darkside, skeptical, acts without consulting others, does not think they are weird but others do, socially uncomfortable, abrupt, fantasy prone, does not like happy people, appreciates strangeness, frequently loses things, acts without planning, guarded, not punctual, more likely to support marijuana legalization, not prone to compromise, hard to persuade, relies on mind more than on others, calm
 
I'm Irish so that renders any tests inconclusive. If I take it I might break it.
 
Introverted (I) 86.67% Extroverted (E) 13.33%
Intuitive (N) 59.46% Sensing (S) 40.54%
Thinking (T) 60% Feeling (F) 40%
Perceiving (P) 64.1% Judging (J) 35.9%

INTP

"Architect"

loner, more interested in intellectual pursuits than relationships or family, wrestles with the meaninglessness of existence, likes esoteric things, disorganized, messy, likes science fiction, can be lonely, observer, private, can't describe feelings easily, detached, likes solitude, not revealing, unemotional, rule breaker, avoidant, familiar with the darkside, skeptical, acts without consulting others, does not think they are weird but others do, socially uncomfortable, abrupt, fantasy prone, does not like happy people, appreciates strangeness, frequently loses things, acts without planning, guarded, not punctual, more likely to support marijuana legalization, not prone to compromise, hard to persuade, relies on mind more than on others, calm

Except for the "messy" part, this is disturbingly accurate.
 
Except for the "messy" part, this is disturbingly accurate.
Because, like horoscopes, it's all pretty general. Not as general as horoscopes, but they have a lot of info you already gave them. I wouldn't call this very disturbing.
 
Yeah, but seeing large parts of my personality laid out in front of me so casually does make me a bit uncomfortable.

Odd how easy it is to categorize people, even if it is in most general terms. I do wonder if it's really only the little things that differentiate us. It's not like i'm the same person as the other INTP's in here, despite overlaps in perception and outlook. It is thought provoking at the very least, is what i was trying to say.
 
Madbringer said:
Introverted (I) 86.67% Extroverted (E) 13.33%
Intuitive (N) 59.46% Sensing (S) 40.54%
Thinking (T) 60% Feeling (F) 40%
Perceiving (P) 64.1% Judging (J) 35.9%

INTP

"Architect"

loner, more interested in intellectual pursuits than relationships or family, wrestles with the meaninglessness of existence, likes esoteric things, disorganized, messy, likes science fiction, can be lonely, observer, private, can't describe feelings easily, detached, likes solitude, not revealing, unemotional, rule breaker, avoidant, familiar with the darkside, skeptical, acts without consulting others, does not think they are weird but others do, socially uncomfortable, abrupt, fantasy prone, does not like happy people, appreciates strangeness, frequently loses things, acts without planning, guarded, not punctual, more likely to support marijuana legalization, not prone to compromise, hard to persuade, relies on mind more than on others, calm

Except for the "messy" part, this is disturbingly accurate.

Aaaah, kin. :)
 
Madbringer said:
Yeah, but seeing large parts of my personality laid out in front of me so casually does make me a bit uncomfortable.

Odd how easy it is to categorize people, even if it is in most general terms. I do wonder if it's really only the little things that differentiate us. It's not like i'm the same person as the other INTP's in here, despite overlaps in perception and outlook. It is thought provoking at the very least, is what i was trying to say.

the truth is nobody is as unique as we'd like to think.
predicting someones personality is in fact rather easy. blind guesses are enough to score at least a good 50%, and by then you may allready have impressed someone enough. keeping it vague, you could make the other half seem to fit better than it did.

notice whenever couples brag about things they have in common, they are often depressingly generic
"oh, we have SO much in common! he likes food, i like food! he likes joy, i like joy! he isnt so keen on torture, and neither am i!"
 
INTP - "Architect". What, no musical career? :cry:

These tests are good for self-esteem and some laughs, but i can't see how they could be used in any other useful way... There are so many variables you have to take into account when trying to figure out someones personality type (if that's even reasonably possible), it's pretty pointless to leave it up to a pretty simple computer generated algorithm, which also will be interpreted very differently, by different people.

Good fun nonetheless :lol:
 
Back
Top