GlutinousRice
Ne travaillez jamais
Someone is going to make a fine wageslave.
When I make money it usually doesn't involve fucking people over and enforcing borderline slave labor. I am a worker not the one running the company, and while I have a good relationship with my bosses I still have to actively remind them of what an employer is not allowed to do, like when someone on the chain forgot to inform us that the last payment of my Government enforced company paid health insurance didn't go through.
"I don't have a profession yet."
Oh isn't that adorable, you don't even have a jobe yet yo uare accusing others of "fearing honest work". This shit is like out of a stand up routine.
Tell me, where is the difference by the government taking the money from you to provide you with an infrastructure that you use most probably daily. And paying corporations to do pretty much the same job, but for money, while offering most of the time less quality.
You end up paying either way, unless your plan is to live in the woods as self sufficient hermit.
Quote:
Paris: local authorities regain control of water management
(...)
The newly elected team were quick to realise that there was total lack of any control over the “delegation” of public sector services, as well as of the provision of services. There was a serious lack of financial transparency, and no control over any work that was carried out.
(...)
Is public management necessarily more virtuous than private?
It is too soon to be able to carry out any evaluation, as the public system has only been operating since January 1st 2010. But it is possible to observe some of the initial advantages of being under public management. Firstly, it is important to underline the big profits that the reform has produced; this money is totally reinvested in the water services. These initial profits are an estimated 35 million euros per annum, if not more. What are the main reasons for this? It is the result of internalising of the profits that the private operators were making. We have public competitive calls for tender for work that was previously handed out to subsidiaries of the major groups that overcharged for carrying it out. We are making the most of a public accounting system. There is no need to pay dividends to shareholders and to set aside part of the profits generated by the water services to pay them. All the revenue from the provision of water services is totally reinvested in the service, and there is complete financial transparency, unlike the previous situation under the private system, where the lack of financial clarity was repeatedly criticized in financial controls.
This idea of corporations run by the people for the people is neat, but it's utopian. And ignoring human nature completely.
You can not run a whole nation just with corporations.
Really? It never did? Not even once? Can you not imagine at least once case where it might be helpfull. You know, just because you never had to use the police, doesn't mean they are not there and keeping the order. Traffic laws, criminality, investigation and so on. You do benefit from the relative safety that is estabiled by law enforcements. What ever if you use them directly or not.
When I am talking about doctors, I am not talking state doctors, I am talking about verification from independed authorities, so that not everyone can call him self a doctor or internist, just because they got their certificate for 20 000 dollar by the Huckleberry Finn Acadame from the Bahamas.
You want to see corporate education in action?
Absolutely ...
How does willingly entering a business relationship make you a slave?Someone is going to make a fine wageslave.
A lot of people on this forum really, really, really hates corporations, don't they? I'm not defending said corporations - quite neutral about this whole debate, not qualified to talk about it - but I can't go five minutes on General Discussion Forum without finding someone pointing out the drawbacks of capitalism.
Sigh...this is why I don't post often on the General Discussion threads. Enjoy your shit throwing. I'm sure no one's opinions will be changed by any arguments made.
If America collapsed, I see only the collapse of its democratic system and a fall into feudal chaos, especially considering the amount of guns in the country. If a revolution did occur, but it had no real plan of action other than remove the established power, the most likely result (imo) would be a military dictatorship of some sort.
Oh, isn't that adorable, you not knowing what a profession is.
Sorry, I shouldn't have made that joke about taxes![]()
I doubt a military dictatorship in the US could hold for long. Civilian militias can potentially form very swiftly there from what I assume (I don't actually live in the US, so what do I know), and the longtime culture there seems to lean toward the idea that even a feigned or a flawed democracy is better than an efficient autocracy. The "for the people" attitude there seems to be strong, even if sometimes misguided. Again, could be very wrong because I don't live there, but I have visited and do have relatives who live there, so this is all based on what I could gather.
Personally? They won't fall apart permanently. Maybe temporary setbacks and a couple of civil disputes, might even descend into outright violence, but it's never going to break down completely like you see in fiction. No offense, but from the books. movies, and TV documentaries everyone has mentioned to be enjoying so far, I think dystopian fiction has been subconsciously increasing pessimism on the future of society a fair bit.
I know what you mean about dystopian fiction. I do worry sometimes that people think, "well... we don't have children forced to kill each other in reality-TV-show-style deathmatches, so our crummy society is a-ok".
The US won't collapse any time "soon" because it's too fucking strong, and has no reason to. It's like pointing at the Chrystler building, and asking when it'll collapse. Idunno, maybe in 800 years or so?![]()
I may have misunderstood your point, but I was actually concerned about the opposite: people thinking that we might actually descend into reality-TV-show style deathmatches, what with there being so much negativity about governments, corruption, profiteers, etc.
Our society does appear crummy, but it's a lot better of then everyone keeps thinking. Everyone has already started to assume that companies are about to drag us into a cyberpunk-like future of "dystopian corporation-owned cities". I mean, it is possible, but we're not heading straight for it like a plane towards a cliff face just yet.
I actually think it's a good thing if people think they're living in a worse society than they actually are. It means they'll always be pushing for improvement. It's when people are living in a dystopian society and are complacent about it that I would grow concerned.
I guess when you put it that way, it does make a bit of sense?
Still personally on the other side of the fence, though - I just think no one is looking at how far we've come, but only at how far we still have to go, which is fairly depressing because when it comes to societal progression, there are no limits. It's like staring to the front of a train moving towards an endless void and contemplating whether the train will ever get to the destination. Considering progress is a subjective concept anyways, it seems pointless.
It's always good to be pushing for improvements, I agree. But it feels upsetting to never look at the improvements that have already been made. Sometimes, it feels like the appreciation for progress has faded away and self-criticism has become the new norm for this generation. But for the people who can't improve without the knowledge that they still have to improve, the mindset you mentioned would be necessary. I guess it just depends on the person.
I would rather us forever look forward than nostalgically look back.
And which of the services that your government currently provides you with, would you not want to pay for? Firefighters? Police? Roads? Please, enlighten us.Because I pay for the service I actually want, not one that is forced on me. If someone came to your front door with a gun, forced you to give him money, would the theft be any less immoral if he went and brought you a bunch of groceries you never asked for and wouldn't have bought if you had the choice?
Che? Seriously now, maybe I am wrong on this one, but when you read so many stories where those corpirations seriously fucked up the environment and people, tell me, how can you not hate some of them at least? Monsato? Nestle? Coke? But hey! If some serious large Oil-spill happend right next to your door or if you developed some skin cancer from a shitty petrochemical plant dumping it's waste for decades in your water supply, and you're still not seeing the issue, then I will take off my hat and be with you, that there is no reason to really, really, really hate them.A lot of people on this forum really, really, really hates corporations, don't they? I'm not defending said corporations - quite neutral about this whole debate, not qualified to talk about it - but I can't go five minutes on General Discussion Forum without finding someone pointing out the drawbacks of capitalism.