D
Deleted member 93956
Guest
Yeah, because that's totally what Skyrim Special Edition did, lmaoEven if it involves shoehorning the FO3 campaign into the FO4 engine—and gameplay?
Yeah, because that's totally what Skyrim Special Edition did, lmaoEven if it involves shoehorning the FO3 campaign into the FO4 engine—and gameplay?
Altchar said:The three placeholders are set for three platforms - PC, Xbox One and PlayStation and they currently have 31 December 2019 placeholder date. There are also standard, deluxe and collector's editions listed under every platform along with a $60 price tag which is, again, Amazon's placeholder info.
While there was no mention of Fallout on these placeholders, the countdown video is the piece that hints at a potential Fallout game. The timer is similar to those used by the publisher in previous Fallout titles which may suggest that Bethesda are planning some Fallout-related announcements in the near future.
When you say Skyrim 76 for whatever reason I think of Skyrim but in the year 1976.Fallout 76 offline version or Fallout 4 online version . Or maybe the great online survival game: Skyrim 76 .
"You see that mountain? You can walk there." - 1976 reminds me that was the year when the term "meme" was first used.When you say Skyrim 76 for whatever reason I think of Skyrim but in the year 1976.
The actual rig which any of post-Morrowind Bethesda's games are designed for, 1976, colorized.
That is the computer they built the gamebyro engine on.The actual rig which any of post-Morrowind Bethesda's games are designed for, 1976, colorized.
I would laugh my ass off if a remaster of Fallout 3 actually happened and some people noticed just how bad Fallout 3 truly is. I would bet good money that a lot of the people that claim the game is good is because of an emotional attachment based on nostalgia, and not the actual quality of the game. And that's because they haven't played the game in literally 10 years.
And if it's something else, not touching it if it's made by Bethesda itself because i already know the design choices they love to use. I would take a look if it was made by a different studio, but i doubt it will happen.
I am curious as to what's lacking in the graphics/art & appearance of 76 & 4?
I have not played (or looked carefully at) either, but that is the last thing I would expect to be sub-par from Bethesda. If anything, I'd think that's all they are good at.
Graphical appearances.What.
I know. They're shit. And considering that Zenimax also owns id, it's utterly inexcusable.Graphical appearances.
If you aren't a post-apocalyptic fanatic, then there are plethora of open-world games where they did general exploration better than Fallout 3 and more. For some recent releases, even though I haven't played it but it's generally critically acclaimed Witcher 3 showing you how it's done, and then there's ELEX! from the creators of objectively THE best that the open-world genre has to offer, which are Gothic 1&2 (you should try them too, even though they're pretty old games because there are ways to make them run properly and smoothly on more modern PC). And lastly, the most recent release I can name of is Kingdom Come: Deliverance.I keep switching between New Vegas and 3 because most newer games that get released these days just suck. I know New Vegas is a way better Fallout game, but as a general exploration game I still prefer FO3.
Literally dozens of open world games that have been released since Fallout 3 that are miles better than it. And Fallout 3's exploration is god awful, about the worst kind of exploration you can have in an open world. Everything scaling to you, no sense of danger, loot is absolute crap and what you explore is copy and pasted crap.3 because most newer games that get released these days just suck.