Threepwood said:
Comparing FO3 to FO1/2 is like comparing Call of Duty to Planescape Torment.
A bit exagerated, but yeah in way the analogy is valid. Call of Duty is an excellent game series btw, though they suffer from being short (if you don't like Multiplayer that is).
Black Feather said:
Fallout 3 is the best fallout game up to date
.
Stopped reading at this point. You know nothing about good RPG's, get out.
First of all, I never said it was a better RPG. I said a better GAME.
I'd actually like to discuss that subject about the concept of RPG, though on another topic for obvious reasons.
Also, I do not wish to leave. I'd appreciate some respect. And may I suggest not isolating yourself on thinking you know better. There is a reason why Fallout 3 was so well received, practically even better than the previous Fallouts. At least you have to admit it just ain't a crappy game.
Crni Vuk said:
gongos said:
Fallout 3 is the best fallout game up to date, period. This is not me saying, this is the overall consensus:
Jesus christ do have to get over that AGAIN? I thought everyone would have heard it at least ONCE by now ...
You know numbers and salles do tell what about teh quality of a product ? Nothing. Did Fallout 1 sold masses compared to letz say Diablo 2 ? Maybe 300 000 games have been sold at that time (but thwas more then enough as one should remember inflation) while Diablo 2 maybe 1 Million copies. Not sure about the exact numbers but definetly more then Fallout 1. And yet no one has a doubt that Fallout 1 is some excelent RPG, remember for its time.
Comparing the numbers is like saying cause Britney is more popular then Bethooven ever was heir music is on the same level as his 9th simphony.
While people have a different taste which is something one should respect quality does NOT equal quanity. Fallout 3 could have sold 10 Million copies and it would still fall short as RPG for me. Even if it would have nothing to do with Fallout at all. I do agree that some quets in F3 are good. But they are not epic. And fairly standart in good RPGs. The rest was just some Sandbox game. And those make usualy not the best RPGs. Good games for exploration. But RPG qualities usualy suffer cause of that.
I'm sorry, but I haven't even mentioned sales. I'm talking about professional reviews, and not just a couple of them (which you could argue they are paid, but really not all of them, at this point is silly to say that).
And Diablo is an excellent game, and I'm not talking about sales. I'm talking about how powerful the game was, specially back at the days. This is of course Diablo 1, Diablo 2 was far hyped. Again, this other subject could use another topic. Gladly to discuss about it.