Fallout 3 headed to XBox? Not unlikely

st0lve said:
I think Bethesda actually knows that their hardcore and hopefully main market (old Fallout fans) is their nr. 1 priority.

Woah....ummm If we the community were their #1 Priority wouldn't they be here, asking questions, putting up ideas, giving us some info?

st0lve said:
So I have high doubts on that Bethesda will make it for consoles then port it to PC.

Have you seen their previous works?
 
There is an alternative to more expensive cross-platform games, that being less expensive niche games. Spiderweb's worked out a profitable environment for themselves, and Stardock made Galciv 2 with a crew that I don't think ever exceeded 20. Though, Galciv 2 provided a game for an undersupported 4X market, and garnered mainstream coverage for it.

The same claim can be made for isometric, turn-based cRPGs. Obsidian is "crazy" enough to release an "isometric" game with Neverwinter Nights 2, and while the player may be given a choice in how to angle the camera, it's still using a non-3rd person or first-person perspective, and it's hardly because of a lack of resources.

If it wasn't realtime w/ pause the game would even be tactical, and actually be an honest translation of D&D rules.
 
DarkPhilly said:
st0lve said:
I think Bethesda actually knows that their hardcore and hopefully main market (old Fallout fans) is their nr. 1 priority.

Woah....ummm If we the community were their #1 Priority wouldn't they be here, asking questions, putting up ideas, giving us some info?
Cause that's not what game developers do in the first place. And how the hell do you know that NO ONE from Beth have ever been on the forums reading our suggestions? My guess is taht they ALL have played Fallout\2 as a part of the pre-prod, to get the "spirit". The reason they probably don't say much, is that they don't want to miss inform people about release dates, features etc. since they probably haven't got a finished list yet. I don't know what you know about marketing or about game development, but when you make a sequel, you aim to please the "old" players which liked the first games. But you also try to reach out for new people, which is why it might go out on X-Box and other consoles, but the old ones are still 1st priority.

How they solve this at Beth I tbh have no idea, but I'd guess multiple camera angles (optionals etc.) and such.

DarkPhilly said:
st0lve said:
So I have high doubts on that Bethesda will make it for consoles then port it to PC.

Have you seen their previous works?
So you think just because ES is in FP, you are so sure that FO3 will be in FP? It's a new (for Beth) franchise, and they have certain "guidelines" to follow. I have no worries yet.
 
I was pondering an idea.
We all want to see a good F3.
If its going to go to a next gen system, we might as well make sure
that the Oblivian fan base and the majority of the gamer population knows about the Fallout Franchise and its potential.

I was watching X Play, and I thought to myself, what if a Gaming Media outlet (I.e) G4 were to do a piece on Fallout,Fallout 2, and the disappointment the Fan base is waiting for?
Maybe shine some lime light on the True Fallout, Give Beth a reason to make F3 in a more Fallout conventional sense by turning the gamers onto Fallout, so by the time F3 comes out, it will be a huge failure making it just another F:POS one more time over or a great success depending upon if they hear the cry of the fan base.

What better weapon does the Fallout fanboy have besides the Media?
Numbers?


Even though this could potentially turn out against us, I believe it is worth a try.

As I see it, If F3 is headed for pending doom, why not go into this head on and try and make a mark on Beth, NMA is already Black listed.

So NMA reps, let me hear your input.
Would you give it a try? :( :?:
Remember this is only an Idea, It has potential, but potentially so many errors and flaws.
 
Fallout3 will for sure be a next gen game, I doubt that Beth will use a really old engine to make FO3, they'll probably upgrade the same as they used for ES. Now, just because it's the same engine doesn't mean it's FP.

Do you think that Beth will make Fallout 3 for the Oblivion fanbase? Don't tell me that this is what you think just because they wanted to hire some talent from their modding community.

Writing a couple of "The TRUE spirit of Fallout" articles, adding them to Digg.com etc. and different places, would maybe reach out to the masses, it's worth a shot. The hardest thing would be to get Beth to read them before it's too late (as in finished pre-prod).
 
st0lve said:
Fallout3 will for sure be a next gen game, I doubt that Beth will use a really old engine to make FO3, they'll probably upgrade the same as they used for ES. Now, just because it's the same engine doesn't mean it's FP.

Do you think that Beth will make Fallout 3 for the Oblivion fanbase? Don't tell me that this is what you think just because they wanted to hire some talent from their modding community.

Writing a couple of "The TRUE spirit of Fallout" articles, adding them to Digg.com etc. and different places, would maybe reach out to the masses, it's worth a shot. The hardest thing would be to get Beth to read them before it's too late (as in finished pre-prod).


That is exactly what I am talking about!!
Digg.com Awesome Idea,
As for Fallout just for Oblivian fans no thats not what I think, I just don't want it to be the "only" aim.
F3 has potential to bring a wide variety of people to Fallout.
I just do not want another misrepresentation of what Fallout is and should be.
 
Have you noticed this topic got a link from GameSpot?


And that whenever is talk of Bethesda and TES the praise is almost universal (almost...) and when people start to talk about FO3 the thing goes to a 50/50 ? I am probably wrong, but after two days of gaming sites and blogs viewing I'm starting to believe this endeavour is a greater risk to Beth than what they think so. They can't be attached to another release that hurts the franchise like in the case of Star Treck. Keep it real, Beth.
 
Briosafreak said:
Have you noticed this topic got a link from GameSpot?


And that whenever is talk of Bethesda and TES the praise is almost universal (almost...) and when people start to talk about FO3 the thing goes to a 50/50 ? I am probably wrong, but after two days of gaming sites and blogs viewing I'm starting to believe this endeavour is a greater risk to Beth than what they think so. They can't be attached to another release that hurts the franchise like in the case of Star Treck. Keep it real, Beth.


That is what I want for them to come to realization of.
Maybe then they will drop it, I could see this as possibly a very large loss, but then again depending upon if it fits a new fan base it could do alright, Not in the eyes of True Fallout fans though.
 
Briosafreak said:
Have you noticed this topic got a link from GameSpot?


And that whenever is talk of Bethesda and TES the praise is almost universal (almost...) and when people start to talk about FO3 the thing goes to a 50/50 ? I am probably wrong, but after two days of gaming sites and blogs viewing I'm starting to believe this endeavour is a greater risk to Beth than what they think so. They can't be attached to another release that hurts the franchise like in the case of Star Treck. Keep it real, Beth.
My sentiments exactly.
 
Avoiding any mention of a platform, Howard continued, "We have pretty long preproduction phases on our stuff doing concepts, design, building prototypes, and such." He then dropped a tidbit more tantalizing to Fallout fans than fresh iguana-on-a-stick: "We should be ready soon to show it off, but we'll see."

Something tells me that mainstream coverage of the issue isn't going to help. Just one guy in the article comments pointed out that we hate the idea.
 
Gamespot said:
The official story: Taking time out of a multicity trip, jet-setting Bethesda vice president of marketing Pete Hines got back to GameSpot. "Yes, we have said before folks are working on it and have been, but we won't say what stage it's in," he said. "In short, no, nothing's changed, no details, no platforms, etc. We give the same answers regardless of who is asking. It will be a while still until we unveil, until then we aren't saying anything."
 
Bullshite. No one gives an exclusive interview to an X-Box magazine if they're not going to publish it on X-Box (360).
Especially not if they're simultaneously ignoring fansites that would seriously dislike such a move.
 
Of course, it's bullshit.

I was told by one of the developers to check the trademarks in September. There were two: Knights of the Nine and Shivering Isles. I made a news post (link), the word got out, Pete said "No, we don't have any expansions in the works". Shivering Isles was officially announced on Jan 18.

There is marketing, and then there are dumb lies. What's sad is that many people believe these lies because they are "official".
 
st0lve said:
The reason they probably don't say much, is that they don't want to miss inform people about release dates, features etc. since they probably haven't got a finished list yet.


Roshambo said:
[assume Oblivion with guns and] RT combat, a near Oblivion/Gothic style viewpoint, and some art that suggests they should have used the Fallout d20 art, and you're about right on.

Oh, and when you hear bits of the story, you're going to be wishing for Van Buren, and I tended to loathe the concept of that game for a reason.

...

The design has been cemented into a development schedule nobody can do anything about, because by the time the people who have been waiting for it have been told through the official news sources - it's far too late!

------------------------------------

st0lve said:
So you think just because ES is in FP, you are so sure that FO3 will be in FP?

Pete Hines said:
We're not going to suddenly do a top-down isometric Baldur's Gate-style game, because that's not what we do well.


-------------------------------------

st0lve said:
I have no worries yet.

Yes. Retards rarely do.


st0lve said:
Do you think that Beth will make Fallout 3 for the Oblivion fanbase?

Bethesda didn't even make Morrowing for their own TES fanbase, and they didn't make Oblivion for their newly acquired Morrowing fanbase. So explain to me, chuckles, why you think they're going to make Fallout 3 for the Fallout fanbase*. "Because the tumor was pressing down on my brain" is the only satisfactory answer I can think of.

*Which they aren't. Check out Roshambo's handydandy summary of Oblivion: Brotherhood of Steel's feature list that I quoted at the top of this post.
 
Check what the XBox gamers are saying


Ok here's another risk, by making the game too X-Box dependant they are jumping to a group of target costumers where the brand recognition is really low, while Oblivion already came out when Morrowind had an established name in the scene. Keep it real Beth.
 
Briosafreak said:
Check what the XBox gamers are saying


Ok here's another risk, by making the game too X-Box dependant they are jumping to a group of target costumers where the brand recognition is really low, while Oblivion already came out when Morrowind had an established name in the scene. Keep it real Beth.


If thats is the Fanbase being aimed at....We are all Fucking DOOMED!
Half of the people were like oh yea !"Flatout" oh yea!

Dumb ass kids, It clearly said "Fallout"!
"Flatout" wasn't even wet dream when Fallout was released.
Noobie ass Bitches!
 
Eh...what the hell:
Fallout is one of the funniest games i have ever played... I just want to see the driver of my car fly through the windshield and bounce off the walls and the ground in glorious High definition.
Apparently half of them think it's 'Flatout', some kind of racing game. Most people there haven't even heard of Fallout, and most are saying 'Hey, it's Bethesda, so it'll be cool!'
Heh. Morons.
 
Back
Top