I have to admit I am confused from what I just read (this entire thread.).
A little background about me to temper responses;
I am a modder (not for the fallout franchise, but other games.)
I am a game developer in my free time (No I will not elaborate.)
I'm a business man
Now I understand that the concept of feedback from the general public is being scrutinized. However I can't see a viable reason why it is being debated. The reason I say this is because of perspective. At no point in time can another individual make a judgement on another persons perspective and be "accurate". (I strongly feel art cannot be judged simply because, I find it to be a form of perspective communication.)
However judgments that focuses on art do generate something. Demographics. Demographics are viable statistics that help developers such as myself gauge a perspective audience. For modders these same demographics can aid them in popularity, and give them a leg up on their competition if they are trying to develop a stand alone product. However this does not include all modders, as the vast majority of modders are only in it for fun, and that I feel is wonderful.
But casting aside statements on the product makes no sense to me, if you are modding just because (insert random reason), then why does the feedback matter? You aren't collecting the data for anything useful, what it sounds like is someone trying to massage their ego.
Now bear in mind that my intention is not to deflate anyone here, but at least try to see the larger picture generated content is. A lot of people don't know this but, a lot of game developers look towards modders to innovate, mostly because the relatively low risk that entails. Examples: (Mojang/Microsoft, Bethesda, Valve).
While this is great from a business perspective, it does tend to trample on those who don't wish to generate feedback. But the data generated is still valid and is often used else were to gauge responses to up coming features.
Therefore I submit this, don't censor anyone when they have an opinion on a product. Because you cannot justifiably state whether or not the content creator is or is not using the data. However if you do not wish for your product to be judged in any fashion then do not distribute your content publicly. At the same time I must admit, making any statements based on generalization such as "like" or "dislike" when referring to the product as a whole is always subtractive even when styled as positive.
TLDR version:
Let people have their say, it's not the end of the world, and not something to get butt hurt over.