Brother None said:Then I won't make up shit to make it make sense. I could do that for Fallout 3 a lot too. If a game doesn't explain something, I won't do it for it.
I have no problem with that. However the game leaves a lot of place for speculation since the endings are vague as shit
You seriously are way too big a fanboy of Mr House. He clearly has ambitions, and clearly has an overly singular, monorailed vision, not allowing any deviation of the course he has decided on. He is not a perfect ruler if such a thing could even exist, he's still a human. Your entire argument rests on him, well, not being that, but he is.
Fanboy? Not really... merely thinking he's interesting, compared to stagnation NCR-support brings, from the player's perspective.
Monorailed vision mustn't mean it sucks, right?
And yep, he's human. But it's like saying Skynet is a computer. The difference between a computer and skynet is like difference between a human and mr. House to me.
Comparatively? No, no it doesn't. Fallout shows humanity as flawed, regardless of how they're ruled. They do not exclusively show democracy as flawed, that's just something you're making up.
Well, I never made up that pre-war gov actually did all that stuff, and it was elected, right?
Enlightened autocracy didn't exist. The options were - assuming nothing changed from "our world" - various degrees of communism, socialism, democracy, republic and despotism. They all suck and are an illusion. They all have a common point - someone rules, but lacking qualities to do so because of being human.
And being human is what you point out - a flawed thing.
House isn't exactly "human" like Kimbal, Richardson and all those other rulers. He may be a good choice, who knows.
Going for another Richardson-to-be definitively isn't a good choice though again, imho. I don't have faith in Fallout's humanity.
Yes? Because it is rational, and not human, but making decisions for human. Fallout has supercomputers by the way, though none ruling anything, unless you want to count the Calculator.
Yes but House isn't a machine. He's merely "imitating" their way of thinking via his "probability" calculations. Which seem better than random annexations and nuclear wars that are the results of ambition House lacks. At least - the kind of ambition to rule over others via force.
Actually, multiple cities throughout Fallout 2 and New Vegas were independent of the NCR and could in some paths remain so. NCR pushes for annexation, yes, but they've never invaded a city.
Not that they COULD, given their Fallout2's still-weak position.
But even as a city they were in Fallout2, and not empire like in FalloutNV, they have plotted dirty annexations. It didn't change, they only have more guns now.
House is a threat to the NCR, so it's not like they have that many options there.
Threat? what kind of threat? He's a threat, yeah - to Kimball's ambition. A small, independent city that can't produce a damn thing - as you stated yourself - isn't a militaristic problem. NCR can ban their citizens into going there anytime, too. What kind of threat House exactly is?
Well, I think that's ridiculous. Especially since you think "stripped of human ambition" is applicable to House when he a) has ambition and b) has human needs (see girl robot).
Yeah, the creepy girl robot. I mentioned that in the first post (I don't really know what to think of it - by explanations we can hear from Raul it sounds... wrong )
House doesn't claim he lacks ALL human needs. By talking about being a perfect leader ("autocrat") he mentions a few. Don't remember exactly, but it sounds pretty good. His position - being a crippled immobile man-machine - also makes an important difference between testosterone-driven alpha males ruling countries. He's just different.
It is. Too bad you made it up, and the game never properly explains it. How many soldiers are in the Mojave? How much spending money do they have? Why would they not save up said money or send it back as many moneys do?
Of course I made up the number. With no ingame data about that, what else can I do? It was merely an example of cash-draining.
Why would they not save? And what prevents them from doing so? It's not like their officers ask them to go spend their money to casinos
You just said Vegas is "just his tool". You are contradicting yourself. It's either just a tool or also a goal.
He already HAS vegas. How can it be his goal? I'm not contradicting myself: it can be both his dream (present-time dream, a dream came true - not "future goal" - again, semantics, language barrier) and a tool.
You don't want to go there. The "but this setting his (this and this impossible thing)" excuse never works. If New Vegas had pink ponies, would you just say "I can't realistically explain them, but neither can I explain ghouls"?
What else do you suggest? Consider Obsidian lack of knowledge of how economics work a decisive factor in "House is stupid", but happily accept their lack of physical knowledge for the good of this game/story?
Fallout uses Science!, that means it has a set verisimilitude, a reality in which our laws of mutation don't apply. That does not mean no laws apply at all. The Hub made sense in economic law, as does the NCR. And then suddenly one location is exempt? It doesn't work that way.
Science! can't explain many, many illogical things in Fallout world, some of which are blatant idiocy. I don't consider plot developer's faulty grasp of economics important enough to consider House stupid
You misunderstood, that is not what I was talking about. I'm questioning where the base productivity comes from. The NCR has no real productivity in the Mojave either. There's a few caravan houses, but that's it. So where's the base productivity that supports a place like New Vegas? Where's the food, where's the good, where's the economy? Apparently we should assume it's back out in the NCR mainland? That still invalidates everything House is saying even if it explains New Vegas.
Let's see:
- somebody forgot to add signs of productivity to the game or deliberately decided not to because of ram limitations and effect/work ratio
- there is none and it all comes from NCR's mainland
Seeing that people lived in Mohave for generations, the food must be somewhere, even if not "animated" in the game (consider it something like lack of crapping: just because it's not shown in the game we mustn't conclude Wastelanders never take a dump)
As for production, well, either ditto, or there really is none on the mohave. But what stops people from NCR that HAS the production to come to Strip to spend some money? Even if there are no factories in immediate vicinity..
There's no point in talking to you if you're just going to keep contradicting yourself.
There's no point to talking if you want to quote me outside context.
Heh, Benny would disagree.
most definitely But I think it's pretty "fair". The place isn't a hole in the ground BECAUSE of House. The place prospers (or at least WORKS) BECAUSE of House. And NCR comes and tells him "give us the strip. NOW).
Where's House's "fault" here, exactly?
Yes. Because you're not the only person living in and working in the city, and you have no right to make that decision.
So you're saying House should do some sort of "do you want to join the NCR" questionnaire and send it to his subordinates?
Sounds pretty funny. let's reverse the situation. If Kimball received a nice "join the Enclave" letter, with a good old "or else" addition, would he throw it to garbage bin, or make a voting on whether to join Enclave or not?
A leader has the right to throw stupid offers to garbage bin if he deems them ridiculous or dangerous to the integrity of the nation he's responsible for, isn't it?
Real world example: If US told Mexico to "join them", would you bash Mexico president for saying 'nope"?
After all he's not the only one living there.
What? The NCR is the only thing keeping Vegas safe from the Legion. They provide all the money Vegas has. They keep the outskirts of Vegas safe from raiders. They brought in caravan trade. They are the only reason New Vegas is what it is. How do they have no right? They have every right.
They have every right to annex it? Weird logic.
Does a company that protects your shop and delivers good to it have the right to annex your shop because of services mentioned?
House never asked for any of this, too.
DForge said:NCR already plotted with Bishops to force Vault
I don't think it's relevant. In a world where raiders, slavers and super mutants run amock, NCR chooses to use as little force as possible, working where possible to cause as few casualties as they can, always preferring politics to violence. They are so ridiculously superior to every other option, it's not even funny.
NCR uses "diplomacy" when it doesn't have enough force to invade. Otherwise, Combat mode.
Wow, such a great faction.. they give you a chance to surrender before coming in with guns blazing before they take what they want. What awesome mercy and moral superiority.
How about my point of view: They are a faction that uses every possible method, preferring non-violent (as they are less costly) ways such as bribery, hiring mercenaries and thugs to do their dirty work and cooperation with crime lords to put their flag everywhere they can - and cannot stand when a community refuses to join?
Oh. So kind of like how House takes tribals and forces them to become his ruling casino houses, not giving them any choice (ask Benny, he sent 20 robots to force his nomadic tribe to become the Chairmen). Oh, and then he forces people out of their homes so he can create a segregated ideal society as defined by himself inside the borders.
Well, I see a small difference here:
-House needed something to start his plan. half-broken robots aren't actually enough to attract people to casinos.
- NCR doesn't actually need anything. They are a thriving community and don't need to greedily annex everything that is in their sight - they have already established a country that prospers.
I don't see House dragging tribals from their beds anymore. Yep, he did it once, there's no point in denying.
NCR however does it all the time. Even when it doesn't need to do it anymore.
You mean he plays off different armies to slaughter one another, has no problem letting the NCR kill themselves to protect his area, has the courier destroy a bunker full of people, and then annexates a dam he has no right to, to then leech power that is desperately needed in the wasteland to power the Strip.
Yeah, he's totally the good guy there.
I never said he's a good guy.
NCR does exactly the same in their quests, anyway, only that House openly admits it while NCR hides behind their ridiculous illusions of democracy (democracy my ass, I can't believe their citizens would actually approve that ridiculous war - which has no point other than greedy land grabbing - but Oligarchs, elected of course, want it so who cares about what the people want).
I already explained that his "playing two armies" was completely justified. NCR would annex Strip immediately after stopping the Legion. (it's not speculation - even the NCR epilogue capitalizes on this>)
There is also the matter of WHY they do this.
House: To secure his Vegas and prevent annexation.
NCR: To happily put their dirty hands on the surrounding lands.
Looks like you have some holes in your knowledge about House
That's what I'm looking for, too more info. I might have missed something.