Norwegian Massacre

Seriously? Capitalist pigs? You realise that majority of those 77 hadn't even reached the age of majority, right? They hadn't even had the chance to be capitalist pigs.

Also lol@ the implication that food animals are in anyway more important that people.

PS creulty is the secret thirteenth ingredient. It's also the best ingredient.

And if the worlds in such shitty shape, stop posting on a nice internet forum about niche video games about it and go deal with it.
 
I'm a misanthrope. Which means I don't like people in general. There are a few exceptions to that 'rule', but seriously: I can count them on the fingers of one hand. As far as I know there is no law that dictates me to do otherwise. Fortunately.
I hate a lot of people, but mostly I just don’t care about them. This means that if I see someone in need of help, I will not help them. Unless the person we’re talking about is an attractive young woman, preferably unconscious. I kid you not.
When a tsunami kills a hundred thousand peasants in some country I have hardly heard of, in a city that I can’t even pronounce, I do not care. In fact, I tend to smile a little. Sometimes I will actually take the time to say: “Exponential growth, motherfuckers, do you know it?” But most of the time I’ll just smile a little. Because in the back of my mind I am doing some simple calculus: 7000000000 – 100000 = 6999900000. And the end result somehow always makes me happy. I’ll actually start daydreaming about deserted streets and lonely cities when these so-called dramas and catastrophies happen.
I smiled when the Towers went down. There was no law that obligated me to cry. Fortunately. There still isn’t. Fortunately. I do not approve of it, in fact I think the guys who did that were complete morons, but still, in the back of my mind a little voice was saying: “You reap what you sow, motherfuckers.” And so I smiled a little.
You have to understand that I rarely smile. And so I take every opportunity that offers itself to me. I also smile a little when my neighbour buys a new and thus bigger car. And I’ll smile a little when I see him having an accident in it. That’s how I work. If someone is successful, I die a little. When someone fails, I blossom up.
So here you have this rich, prosperous Scandinavian country, blessed with its own oilfields, a country wise enough to stay the hell out of the European nightmare, a country – in fact – that makes other countries look like Togo, and still some reincarnated psycho-Viking over there cracks up and goes crazy on a herd of homo sapiens. Why? For his ideas. His ideology. His set of memes. A single hornet might ravage an entire beehive because his genes tell him to do so, we humans can exterminate another human, another city and even an entire race because our memes tell us to do so (I hope you know what I am talking about, because I’m not explaining). Personally, I see no difference. Both are purely Darwinian in nature. Both fascinate me and make me smile. I like seeing proof of the theory of evolution. It is somehow cute to see humans (myself included of course) put to practice what the theory says.
You want the short version?
WW2 was a colony of war ants on search and destroy mode, conquering various colonies of termites before getting visited by the two-headed ant-eater.
Iraq was a mouse who encountered a python.
I think no more of humans than I think of those creepy crawlies. Humans claim to be different from them because they possess this thing called ‘intelligence’, but I have yet to see proof of that. I’m still more impressed by the voice in my head that goes: “Exponential growth, you mongrels. God doesn’t exist, you dunces. And you reap what you sow!”

That psycho-Viking is what you eventually reap. If he is anything, he is a thermometer that tells us society is in a fever. He is what you get when you put homo sapien, who has barely learned to put his animal past behind him, in a grey, concrete world of stress, memetic warfare , competition, economic growth, sex, money money money, and insane consumerism. He’s telling us that we’re on the wrong course. He’s one of them bacteria that realizes that the petridish is full and that he ought to eat the other bacteria to stay alive. But then in terms of memes, not genes. It’s different, but it’s the same.
And it does not impress me.
If at birth, some divine being would have told me I would eventually die at the age of – let’s say – 16, but that I could choose to live these years in a capitalist paradise or in fucking Togo, I would have opted for the capitalist paradise. Everyone would have. Somehow life in a capitalist paradise is more, is better, is worth more than life in a shitty country. Us lucky westerners have developed this attitude that if life in the West is better than elsewhere, then the people in the West must be better than elsewhere. They must be worth more, they must be more developed, more intelligent, they must be somehow more human. That’s why your local newspaper doesn’t have a daily headline saying: “Another 2000 people died in Africa yesterday because they have no fucking water”, but changing headlines that go: “Gwyneth Paltrow caught naked” or “USA invade Iraq” or “77 killed in Oslo”. You think Sassa Umbalek gives a fuck after his whole family got butchered with a machete because the elders of the town thought they were witches? You think Sirra Moleiem gives a fuck after she’s just had her clitoris and labia removed by her own fucking grandmother because some absurd meme lives on? How much exactly is a spoiled teenager’s life worth more to you than those lives in the shadows of the media? Does having a cellphone, an iPod and the freedom to express your own opinions make you better than the daily deads in other countries? Where is their headline, their newsbreak, their morning debate show?
Fuck it. To me, they’re all the same. And so I tend to get annoyed by the over-coverage of such a minor drama (really) and the ladies in the queue in the supermarket that go: “Oh, it’s such a shame, such young people…” What about those thousands and thousands of others that suffered and died the same fucking day? Aren’t they part of the species as well?
I am most amused by the frauds that analyze these sorts of dramas on tv. They never quite get it, do they? They always go the psychotic, mass-murderer way. A deluded individual. Trapped in his own web of lies. He’s not a product of the crazy, capitalist consumer society he was brought up in, no, he’s a strange mutation, an abomination, an exception to the rule. Right. There’s probably hundreds of these ticking time bombs walking around in our clean, safe society as we speak. They are victim to data overload and urban loneliness. The guy who did this thing in Oslo is probably more intelligent than you and me together. Isn’t it weird that in his capitalist paradise he would rather put his intelligence to work at some devilish scheme instead of aiding that capitalist paradise? You ever thought about that? Isn’t the bacteria that realizes the petridish is full and he should start feeding on the other bacteria the most intelligent of the bunch? Isn’t that what Darwinism tells us? What if memes follow the same destructive paths as genes? What then?

Three weeks ago, the friend of an ex of mine poured gasoline over his body and lighted himself. He was schizophrenic and didn’t want to take his medicin any longer. He’s in the hospital now, in an artificial coma, getting skin crafts and all. The girl is going nuts but I simply do not care. I can not care. This guy is a lemming that failed to follow the right path. The fly who wanders into the web. Fuck him. And his schizophrenia. And fuck that drama queen of an ex. “People are dying all of the time!” Consider him lucky. Now he’s mutilated and schizophrenic. Maybe he’ll see the fucking light now.
Ya’ll want to be healthy, ya’ll want to be rich, ya’ll want to be famous, ya’ll want to have made a difference here or there, but you all forget about the other seven billion dreamers on this planet. You can’t see much further than your city, your country, your Western ideology, you stupid set of memes. It’s ridiculous that I even have to explain this sort of stuff to you. Do you even realize how conditioned you are?
If you can’t print a newspaper that reflects the real Mc Coy, if you can’t give a newscast without favouring your sort, if you can’t give me the raw data and the hard truth, then sod off, I’m not interested.
On my terrace a ladybug is going berserk on some lice that we’re infesting my tomatoes.
It affects me not.

Sabirah said:
You ASK people why they have kids!? WHY?
Because there are already 7 billion of us on this small, polluted planet? Because most of them should know better because they enjoyed the same sort of education I did? Because exponential growth is something you learn about when you're seven? Because maybe informed people know a little better than to follow the dogma of their rather stupid genes? Because maybe it's not that smart to put 50% of your genes on a planet that is obviously going downhill fast?

I dunno. What does God have to say about these sort of things?

Wintermind said:
Also lol@ the implication that food animals are in anyway more important that people.

What exactly makes people more important than "food animals" (never heard that one before, but sounds a lot like "human resources", don't you think?)? The fact that they can spend most of their lives doing ungrateful jobs for ungrateful companies that make sure that future generations will have to do the same ungrateful jjobs for pretty much the same ungrateful companies? Or no, wait... is it love? Is love what makes humans so different to animals for you? :D I'm 35, see, I don't buy into that bullshit any longer.
It's the cellphone and the computer, innit? Those are the things that make humans more important than, say, the intricate complexity of coral reefs, right? If that asteroid hadn't killed the dinos, we would still have evolved, right? We're the chosen ones, the special species, the favoured multicellular organisms.

:roll:

Oh man.

Wintermind said:
Seriously? Capitalist pigs? You realise that majority of those 77 hadn't even reached the age of majority, right? They hadn't even had the chance to be capitalist pigs.

Piglets. Piggies. Whatever. It's just words, man.

Sabirah said:
If you have such a problem with poverty and people dying in Africa join the Red Cross/Crescent instead of talking to us about it.
Sorry: misanthrope. :D

Ilosar said:
Quite done? Now, why don't you go say that in the face of the victim's families? ''By the way, some people have it worse off then you are. People you are close to being gunned down by a maniac is no big deal, seriously get over it. Oh, and you society sucks, and so do you, capitalist pig. So there''.

Actually, yes, I would. Make it happen and I'll do it. Might wake those self-pitying bastards up a little. Like saying: "Hey, isolationalist: there's a whole world out there, get with it."

Ilosar said:
What's your damn point, that we should just stop living and caring about others because shit out of our control happens?
Quite the contrary. I'd rather see people get on with their lives, enjoying it as much as modern society allows an individual to enjoy it.

And with that little note of humanity I would like to end this post of mine. Thank you and I'm suure we will meet again,

-- alec
 
OK, so by your own words you are just a sad old guy who enjoys the misery of others because he is alone, and think that it makes him smarter than the rest. Got it.

The funniest bit is that you then try to explain why people being gunned down is good (or even a sort of message, as opposed to just one insane guy who can't handle the fact the world changes) by citing examples of people dying in other circumstances, as if living in Norway makes your life less valuable than living in Africa because you are less in danger of dying. Just stop. You are digging yourself deeper into the abyss of pitiful arrogance.

Also, your disregard of the very real problems of mental illness (this coming from someone who knows first hand how terrible it is) makes you an ignorant on top of that. For a know-it-all-seen-it-all-don't-care type, you seem a woefully poor sort.
 
jesus christ wall of text.

we're more important than food animals because they're food animals. It's one of those things that's kind of self explanatory. when another species start domesticating other animals lets talk about them being important.

and yes capitalist pigs. it's the sort of thing you'd expect to hear from the villain in Red Dawn or something similar. it's a phrase, when uttered by someone, makes you think they're some sort of hilariously uneducated idiot. and probably a communist.

also pig is resolved solely for referring to police.
 
Wintermind said:
we're more important than food animals because they're food animals. It's one of those things that's kind of self explanatory. when another species start domesticating other animals lets talk about them being important.

Not saying that I agree with that guy, but that's horrible logic.
 
alec said:

Rhetoric. Yeah I get it, Westerners are truly no more civilised than the natives of the Congo and Amazon Rainforest. We're all trapped in a world of mass consumerism, rational self-interest is evil, the power elite control our every emotion, we should all go live in a egalitarian paradise, blah blah. Whatever your suggesting, no wait you aren't suggesting anything just bitching.

alec said:
Because there are already 7 billion of us on this small, polluted planet? Because most of them should know better because they enjoyed the same sort of education I did? Because exponential growth is something you learn about when you're seven? Because maybe informed people know a little better than to follow the dogma of their rather stupid genes? Because maybe it's not that smart to put 50% of your genes on a planet that is obviously going downhill fast?

I dunno. What does God have to say about these sort of things?

Think your best mate/comedian Darwin has an explaination for why all animals breed and why it is important; I think it's called Natural Selection or even just a natural instinct.

alec said:
What exactly makes people more important than "food animals" (never heard that one before, but sounds a lot like "human resources", don't you think?)? The fact that they can spend most of their lives doing ungrateful jobs for ungrateful companies that make sure that future generations will have to do the same ungrateful jjobs for pretty much the same ungrateful companies? Or no, wait... is it love? Is love what makes humans so different to animals for you? :D I'm 35, see, I don't buy into that bullshit any longer.

It's the cellphone and the computer, innit? Those are the things that make humans more important than, say, the intricate complexity of coral reefs, right? If that asteroid hadn't killed the dinos, we would still have evolved, right? We're the chosen ones, the special species, the favoured multicellular organisms.

:roll:

Oh man.

Unless you believe in a higher power, then importance is purely subjective and therefore only applyable to anything other than satisfying natural instincts by people; that's why a human being is more important than underwater weeds growing on a rock. Most people aren't jaded misanthropes with an exaggerated sense of importance like you (and I thought I disliked people); people have compassion, empathy and all that other shit.

Entire species completely subjugated to human use, humans are as much masters of this environment as it is possible too; stop using pathetic 'chosen ones' and 'special' to ridicule people, those words imply that our ability to have this conversation is the will of another. Humans are dominant because of evolution, because of millenia of slowly progressing to what we are to-day; I don't know ask your friend Darwin.

OH MAN.

alec said:
Sorry: misanthrope. :D

How conveinient.

"If you think that we're all just decadent Western assholes why don't you help these other people you believe we oppress?"

"That's the thing... I don't care; I just be trolling."

alec said:
Actually, yes, I would. Make it happen and I'll do it. Might wake those self-pitying bastards up a little. Like saying: "Hey, isolationalist: there's a whole world out there, get with it."

People have grieved over the loss of loved ones for millenia -something even your precious "Darwin, humanity is still just an animal" still hasn't phased out; your the odd-ball here pal. Do misanthropes breed? Maybe that's why your opinion is in the MASSIVE minority.
 
The Enclave 86 said:
Think your best mate/comedian Darwin has an explaination for why all animals breed and why it is important; I think it's called Natural Selection or even just a natural instinct.
He did. He actually wrote a separate book on humans in which he expressed his fear about humans straying off the path of natural selection by keeping the weaklings of society alive. That’s how social Darwinism came into existence.
It is however very interesting to think about why we aren’t allowed to listen to our genes in certain cases (for instance xenophobia), but are allowed to listen to them in other situations (the call of motherhood). Giving child support to new parents in a world that is overpopulated has got to be the funniest joke in the universe. I kid you not.
The Enclave 86 said:
people have compassion, empathy and all that other shit.
They sure do. The history of humankind is a romantic story of compassion, empathy and love. That’s why, throughout my education, I was to study about the wars they waged, the casualties they made and the absurd ideas they put into their skulls time and time again.
The only teachers I ever heard talk about the things you mention, we’re the priests who also tried to make us believe there was some big dude out there who was micro-managing all that stuff. I’m just saying.
The Enclave 86 said:
"That's the thing... I don't care; I just be trolling."
I’m not trolling. I wrote down what I think about the subject. And I never became impolite once. Please do not accuse me of something I did not do. It’s not polite.
AskWazzup said:
Stating that people are simple beings is not right, at least from my perspective. With all the accomplishiments in science we still can't explain a plethora of things that happen in our brain, we can't even clearly define what consciousness is, so claiming that people are simple robotic cattle is... interesting...
You do realize that you just answered your own ‘question’, do you? We can’t explain ‘a plethora of things’ because we’re rather simple animals. We still can’t explain what exactly is going on inside the brain of a mouse either. Does that make mice equally complex animals as human are, or does it make humans rather simple for not being capable of fully comprehending such a seemingly small, simple organism as a mouse?
I dunno. The only thing I do know is that mice don't build giant temples and houses of worship for things that don't exist. I don't see mice building concentration camps. I don't see mice killing each other just because their fur has a different colour.
You know?
 
He did. He actually wrote a separate book on humans in which he expressed his fear about humans straying off the path of natural selection by keeping the weaklings of society alive

Actually, he expressed concerns and scientific interests, not fear. He didn't advocate social darwinism, he was disgusted by the very idea actually because it completely contradicts his theories that things always change, and as such finding a constant ''superior'' species is impossible. It's not the stronger species that survive, but the one most responsive to change. And anyway, ''social darwinist'' usually haven't read Darwin, and the most famous one (you know the one, had a fancy mustache) outlawed his works.

It is however very interesting to think about why we aren’t allowed to listen to our genes in certain cases (for instance xenophobia), but are allowed to listen to them in other situations (the call of motherhood).

Xenophobia is in our genes now? Why don't you ask someone competent about it and come back to us.

Oh yeah, I forgot, Misanthrope. Probably a convenient excuse not to approach anyone, I guess, he could give you malaria by talking to you or something, the inferior capitalist pig.

That’s why, throughout my education, I was to study about the wars they waged, the casualties they made and the absurd ideas they put into their skulls time and time again.

Because people being happy, giving birth, caring to their families, having fun, and generally being pleasant persons just happens. No need to record it. While wars and diseases and propaganda and shit are more outstanding, and are harbinger of changes (conflict in general brings more changes than anything, and thus is held as being more interesting), and so are recorded for future reference, which is why we learn about it in schools.

Shit, I should not have to tell this to you, I figured that out in college.

I dunno. The only thing I do know is that mice don't build giant temples and houses of worship for things that don't exist. I don't see mice building concentration camps. I don't see mice killing each other just because their fur has a different colour.
You know?

Nope. You do see mice adopting a social structure extremely similar to human's when put together (with leaders beating other up, dredges being forced by the former to go fetch good, and loners), fighting over bits of space, over whom fucks whom, ect. And many animals have sadistic or cruel behaviors; your average household cats probably makes his prey suffer just because. And social insects (ants, termites, bees and wasps to a lesser extent) have many, many behaviors similar to large-scale war for territory, or because the others aren't of the same species as them. Or just do it the locust way and ravage everything. Such conflicts comes with being in society, humans aren't in any way better or worse, we are just bigger and have the ability and intellect to craft those fancy toys that gives us a definite edge.

Look at how you all tried to pull the intellectual dog-pile on Alec here.

Arguments you don't even respond to are intellectual dog-piles? You expect to be taken seriously by any critical mind after dismissing anybody who disagrees with such empty rebuttals? And you still haven't told me what ''staunch moralist'' stands for, or how it is bad, as it seems to be a catch phrase of yours.
 
Ilosar said:
Arguments you don't even respond to are intellectual dog-piles? You expect to be taken seriously by any critical mind after dismissing anybody who disagrees with such empty rebuttals? And you still haven't told me what ''staunch moralist'' stands for, or how it is bad, as it seems to be a catch phrase of yours.
You must have mistaken me for somebody who answers to you. As if I'm going to debate a moralist (ie. a human who believes humans can, or ought to be in your case governed by a set of morals) over the mass murder of a group of moralists. This is the problem, this is why you can't bring up something out of respect for the dead, which in itself is idiotic. Those who were great and died should be honored, everybody else is a statistic.

It is always the best having value and virtue and everything and everybody else having none. The elite versus the peasant. These kids were peasants, even if their parents and intellectual peers were and are flushing their country down the loo.

Anyone wanna know why those kids were killed? This is why:

boikott-israel-e1311715971289.jpg


They cared about the 'wrong' people. Better to opt out and care about none.
 
Haha wow, okay, so you apparently are the sole judge of who is ''great'' and deserves to live, and who is a ''peasant'' and deserves to die, all because of their ideology? Need a temple to fit that ego?
Also, at least be consistent.

As if I'm going to debate a moralist (ie. a human who believes humans can, or ought to be in your case governed by a set of morals)

So, having morals is a bad thing apparently, but

Those who were great and died should be honored

It is always the best having value and virtue and everything and everybody else having none

Those are sets of morals, buddy, even if they date from the feodal era or something. Every single person has morals, with the possible exception of some having mental illnesses, and pretending to have none and be governed only by rationality only shows how deluded you are.

As such, no more responding to you or paying attention to your posts, will make us both happy I guess.
 
Horus9k said:
Those who were great and died should be honored, everybody else is a statistic.
Greatness is subjective, though.
The value of a human life or a human being cannot be compared.
A million lifes are as worthy (or worthless) as one.
And "elite and peasants"? What do you mean by that?
Caring about noone is one thing (personally, I'm a nihilist and I don't particularly care about people, either), but acting like a dick all day out of sheer arrogance is another.
It doesn't hurt to be reasonably nice and polite to people.
You don't even have to be that actively. Just shut up when it's appropriate.
 
Hassknecht said:
It doesn't hurt to be reasonably nice and polite to people.
Of course not, I'm exceptionally polite and nice to almost every person I meet. I just don't thrust morality on them like a male stripper thrusts his codpiece into an old slut's face.
Ilosar said:
As such, no more responding to you or paying attention to your posts, will make us both happy I guess.
Great, your summation of the Legion could have made a goldfish die of boredom.
 
Ilosar said:
Actually, he expressed concerns and scientific interests, not fear.
It is said that semantic arguments are the last and least favourable way of winning a discussion. Why stoop so low?

Loser said:
He didn't advocate social darwinism, he was disgusted by the very idea actually because it completely contradicts his theories that things always change, and as such finding a constant ''superior'' species is impossible.
Where exactly did I state he advocated social darwinism?

Loser said:
It's not the stronger species that survive, but the one most responsive to change.
Where exactly did I state that the stronger species survive? Why are you telling me things I already know, but didn't even mention in my posts?

Loser said:
And anyway, ''social darwinist'' usually haven't read Darwin, and the most famous one (you know the one, had a fancy mustache) outlawed his works.
Nietzsche didn't "outlaw" Darwin's works. Have you actually read "The Descent of Man" or did you read the Wikipedia page on it?

Losar said:
Xenophobia is in our genes now? Why don't you ask someone competent about it and come back to us.
It most certainly is. It's encoded into all other species on this planet, unless you think a lion is just being racist when he sees another lion who wants to fuck his harem. Maybe you think that ants have some big brainbug (Starship Trooper style) that commands them to destroy nearby termite colonies? Maybe you imagine two ants sitting in the ant cafe, going: "Damn those nearby termites, they have no manners and they rape our women. We should launch an ant's crusade and destroy them!"

Of course xenophobia is encrypted into our genetic make-up. It's what gave rise to all the wonderful xenophobic memes that shaped the world.

I am referring to stuff like WW2, if you weren't following. But I'm also referring to the disappearance of the Neanderthaler, Tibet, the Roman Empire and the hordes of barbarians, the Cathars, and so on.

Liosar said:
Oh yeah, I forgot, Misanthrope. Probably a convenient excuse not to approach anyone, I guess, he could give you malaria by talking to you or something, the inferior capitalist pig.
You do realize that a misanthrope isn't exactlly the same as someone who is afraid of germs, right?

Leotard said:
Because people being happy, giving birth, caring to their families, having fun, and generally being pleasant persons just happens. No need to record it.
It has been and is being recorded. In poetry, for instance, which is a genre that all humans love, which is why it's so big and popular. :roll: Love is a footnote in history, my friend. It is not important whatsoever. It's one of those lies grown-ups tell their kids so that the kids would enjoy life a little more.
Funny how all love songs tell me about how shitty love is. How much it hurts. Funny how if I want to find an empathic, caring person, I have to go to a shrink who charges 60 euros per hour.
Yeah, this species is all about love, innit?

Also: read Ayn Rand. A neoliberal world isn't exactly the place to go cry for help.

Liosart said:
Shit, I should not have to tell this to you, I figured that out in college.
Figured it out when my mom was still giving me the nipple. :P

Nope. You do see mice adopting a social structure extremely similar to human's when put together (with leaders beating other up, dredges being forced by the former to go fetch good, and loners), fighting over bits of space, over whom fucks whom, ect.
Yeah, well, lab conditions do not exactly reflect natural
behaviour, now do they?

Losar said:
And many animals have sadistic or cruel behaviors; your average household cats probably makes his prey suffer just because.
What an asinine thing to say. Behavioural studies show that cats basically hone their skills on their pray. It's education. And only well-fed animals play with their pray. Hungry animals always go for a quick kill, which saves them calories.

Read more books, man.

And social insects (ants, termites, bees and wasps to a lesser extent) have many, many behaviors similar to large-scale war for territory
Which is something I already wrote, thank you very much.

Loser said:
or because the others aren't of the same species as them.
As I said: xenophobia. Encrypted into their dna. I feel like I have to repeat myself an awful lot when writing to you. :D
 
alec said:
It most certainly is. It's encoded into all other species on this planet, unless you think a lion is just being racist when he sees another lion who wants to fuck his harem. Maybe you think that ants have some big brainbug (Starship Trooper style) that commands them to destroy nearby termite colonies? Maybe you imagine two ants sitting in the ant cafe, going: "Damn those nearby termites, they have no manners and they rape our women. We should launch an ant's crusade and destroy them!"

Of course xenophobia is encrypted into our genetic make-up. It's what gave rise to all the wonderful xenophobic memes that shaped the world.

I am referring to stuff like WW2, if you weren't following. But I'm also referring to the disappearance of the Neanderthaler, Tibet, the Roman Empire and the hordes of barbarians, the Cathars, and so on.

Xenophobia is different to that. The Lion example you gave was one Lion killing another over mating rights; I can only assume that Ants kill Termites because of resources or territory. Those were battles waged for property and the good of that particular race/colony. Xenophobia is hate or fear of another race or culture, not animal instincts like those you described as Xenophobia.
 
No. Xenophobia. A hornet doesn't kill a beehive because he needs resources.

Also:

maximaz said:
alec said:
Between 14000 and 19000 died in the September 11 attacks.

:? say what?

Editing text can cause problems. :wink:

That would be 3000 casualties, to be more or less precise. (And yes: I had to google that.)
 
The Enclave 86 said:
alec said:
No. Xenophobia.

Explain?


xenophobia (ˌzɛnəˈfəʊbɪə)

— n

hatred or fear of foreigners or strangers or of their politics or culture


This fear or hatred can of course be caused or fed by a number of reasons. Maybe one hates or fears the other because they are 'stealing' resources. Maybe because their women get raped. Maybe they don't want to bow down to some deity never heard about.

Xenophobia. It helped shape the world. Trust me. :D
 
Back
Top