The sad thing is, I'd rather pay
On that note, I wonder if the backlash from this game is actually further lowering our chances of seeing another Fallout game by Obsidian (if we just pretend for a second that there ever were any chances). The top hats at Beth don't strike me as guys who wouldn't let their huge ego get in the way. After this mess, I kinda doubt they would ever let Obsidian or anyone else prove that they'd handle the franchise better.
Which makes the whole thing a lot sadder.
I don't know about you, but the best chance we have is if MCA is allowed to work on Fallout 5 or whatever comes next.
But I doubt that'll happen, for starters, Bethesda do indeed have huge egos, they don't want anyone to prove they could do better than them. They let Obsidian do that once and it but them in the ass (people still prefer New Vegas over F4, in fact, I think the general opinion that F4 is a disapointment, even by Bethesda standards).
Maybe they learn from this experience, the fans who have stayed since Skyrim will only perish with time, and they need to win back the trust of their fans (those who enjoyed Oblivion and F3).
I think we're a lot closer to those guys than we like to admit, at least I need to check online somewhere.
But yeah, most people do indeed want another Obsidian Fallout game, but it's not in Bethesda's best interests to let them in the long run. It may make them money, but people would always say that Obsidian did it better (you'll get the odd person here or there who says NV is crap or so) but people generally prefer either 3 or NV.
I think I know why, and it's mostly because people see F3 with rose tinted glasses.