Parenting and Drinking for Eternity

I've pointed it out about a dozen times now (and I'm not the only one). The fact that they're black is irrelevant, yet you noting it implies it is relevant. Which part of that do you find hard to understand?
 
Well, good to see that this went from Project Eternity, to Drinking and Parenting, to imagining and debating over racism.
 
Well, good to see that this went from Project Eternity, to Drinking and Parenting, to imagining and debating over racism.

Too late man, I already pointed that out :P

Also Sander's right. No one's disputing that blacks are involved in more murders. It's just that there are many, many other aspects that make the fact they're black mostly irrelevant, Thus, focusing on their blackness is at best also irrelevant and at worst racist.
 
Walpknut said:
DB didn't mention blackness until you all started calling him racist.

When asked about downtown New Orleans and Detroit(no one had called him a racist yet):

DammitBoy said:
Imagine any street in a former colonial city in africa but with more gunfire.
I have known DB a long time and suspect he is a racist, so I call him out on that.

His response:
DammitBoy said:
The running count for murders by gunfire in new orleans for this year thus far is 160 and counting. A record low.

http://www.nola.com/crime/murders/

Guess who is shooting whom?

When challenged on that(by Ilosar who pointed out the race was irreverent):
DammitBoy said:
Ilosar said:
And of course New Orleans is the only place in the US where that happens.
Of course not, it* happens in every major US city where you have a concentration of poor black people.

It's not racist, it's statistically accurate.
*it being murders by gunfire.

Look at his statements. He is prejudice against inner city Black people and tries to hide behind statistics. If he wasn't trying to score points against black people it would have be the easiest thing in the world to not talk about black people. But he continued talking about black people and claiming statistics and facts.
 
Sander said:
I've pointed it out about a dozen times now (and I'm not the only one). The fact that they're black is irrelevant, yet you noting it implies it is relevant. Which part of that do you find hard to understand?

I merely stated a fact. Facts are not racist.

You supposing why I did so is not my concern nor does it point to racism, it points to you jumping to obvious conclusions based on your personal bias towards me.
 
of course facts can't be racist. But the way how you present them can be if the relevance has no meaning on the subject.

Like that you have to mention that most rapists in norway are white for example.

What kind of meaning has that to the subject though? None. But its a fact.

The only person youre trolling DB, is your self. For most of us which argue here with you it has no relevance if the shootes are now "black" or "white". Becaues now that you stat this fact, what are we supposed to do with it?

Skin Colour is not playing for us a role here, and some of us are puzzled why you hammer so much on it, that its not racistic and just a fact when again, what are you doing with that so called "fact"? Let them be "black". So what. What relevance has it that you know those people are black? The question is what you do with that information.

*Edit
Its interesting that you also mention personal "bias" when several people here jumped on you for being racist with that comment. And most of those people know your posts and habits here now for a while. But yes. its 5 people which are wrong not DB. Thats impossible. Even though this is not about "right" or "wrong". We just know your posts by now. What ever you are trolling us all now or not.
 
To get the subject back on parenting, I would counsel my children to avoid those areas populated by gangbangers.

It would be prudent to avoid groups of teenage black males in the inner cities, based on facts - not racism.

Probably a good idea for my daughter to avoid white males in Norway too...
 
i thought most rapes happening in norway, scandavia, and those norse countries were immigrant muslims to the point where police releasing statistics saying that were labeled racist so they had to leave race out of reporting statistics?
 
1 in 2500000 is likely to go completely nuts and blow up the gubment and shoot like a hundred kids though. So yeah, stay away fom those guys.
 
TheWesDude said:
i thought most rapes happening in norway, scandavia, and those norse countries were immigrant muslims to the point where police releasing statistics saying that were labeled racist so they had to leave race out of reporting statistics?

You sir, are a prejudiced racist. The fact that they are muslims has no bearing on them being rapists.

You must look at the underlying cultural differences to understand why rape is okay for muslims.

:crazy:
 
„Muslim“ is not a race.
Also, there's no such thing as „race“. It's a pseudoscientific word that simply doesn't fit with humans. The differences between so-called „races“ are miniscule and not enough to differentiate between races.
 
As for the Norwegian rape statistic, it is _severely_ selective, and only deals with "assault rape". The vast majority of rapes are "at home", and perpetrated by natives. White people. In other words: In Norway, Norwegians do most of the raping.
Just thought I'd throw it out there, despite how obvious it really should be.
 
Formerk said:
Sociology is hardly a pseudoscience
Yeah, that would be an insult to actual pseudosciences.
Anyway, race is not part of sociology, it's supposed to be biological and mostly used in anthropology. But the taxonomic differences between the supposed races are minimal, thus any classification of human races is pseudoscientific.
 
As for the Norwegian rape statistic, it is _severely_ selective, and only deals with "assault rape". The vast majority of rapes are "at home", and perpetrated by natives. White people. In other words: In Norway, Norwegians do most of the raping.
Just thought I'd throw it out there, despite how obvious it really should be.

Stop making sense. Muslims are teh evil and should be blamed in every circumstance.

Also apparently for all of them rape is OK. Which is news to me.
 
Hassknecht said:
Anyway, race is not part of sociology, it's supposed to be biological and mostly used in anthropology

No it isn't. Anthropology hates to term "race" and tends to avoid it whenever they can. Back in the 50s-60s, maybe, but post-Levi-Strauss, no way. The only discussion of race anthropology has now is to discuss how societies view and use the concept of "race".

I'm not a big fan but sociology and anthropology are legit academic fields. They don't use the concept of race.

DammitBoy said:
You must look at the underlying cultural differences to understand why rape is okay for muslims.

See, guys? You just hand DB a bit of rope and he hangs himself.

This thread has been going on quite a bit too long.
 
Brother None said:
DammitBoy said:
You must look at the underlying cultural differences to understand why rape is okay for muslims.

See, guys? You just hand DB a bit of rope and he hangs himself.

*sigh*

You know damn well I was joking, kharnt.

Does you fantasy involving black men make you a racist?
 
Back
Top