The Guns and Ammo Thread

If i could i would buy a H&K SL-8 (http://www.world.guns.ru/civil/civ009-e.htm, however here in Brazil is TERRIBLE expensive, and even if I could pay, 5,56 is not allowed here.
If I am going to be doing long range action this is my weapon of choice. And yes, I have used it.



Caliber: .50 BMG (12.7 x 99mm)
Operation: Short Recoil, Semi-Automatic
Overall Length: 1448 mm
Barrel Length: 737 mm
Feed Device: 10 Round Detachable Box Magazine
Sights: 10 or 20X Telescopic
Weight: 12.9 kg empty
Muzzle Velocity: 854 m/s (M33 Ball)
Max Effective Range: 2000 meters
Expected accuracy: 1.5 - 2.0 MOA or better
Realy, i would buy a M99. Love that gun, and it's REALY precise (1 MOA, check out the site i gave in the snipers area)
About supressers, if you got a good one, in a urban enviroment (with cars ect.)you can't hear it at 200m, in silence 300/400m or so i remember. Supressors also make the guns more precise (extended barrel), but they make the gun dirty very quick.
If you put a supressor in a .45 weapon, it makes almost no noise (.45 is subsonic!).
 
HK is terribly expensive anywhere ;)

also, the SL8 is a rip-off. uses exclusive HK magazines only (and they're not even compatible with the ones from the G36).
isn't it also rather ironic that an SL8 costs more than a military or LE G36? pfffft.

really, i'm staying the FUCK away from HK rifles. there are far better alternatives.
 
H&K

Yep, i like the SL-8 because of the desing, realy, a piece of art!
But for firepower and price/benefits i would buy a M99... Anyway, i love that SL-8 desing! Both are not permitted in Brazil, so, only eye candy :(
 
except some people use the FiveseveN for pistol practise up to 100 yards. says enough, doesn't it?
 
with the correct ammo, it can be done appearantly. shoots minute of badguy at 100 yards, and even lands rather consistently.

i'd disregard the claim, but i've heard the same from several sources. of course, that kind of marksmanship isnt for everybody.

and dont forget that a 57 is rather hard to learn for most people. the grip is kinda odd at first and you'll think the sights are off. but they're not, so dont mess with them straight away. it's all your own fault. ;)
but after a 100 rounds you should get the hang of it. it isn't like a 1911 or Browning HP that you can just pick up and immediately shoot rather accurately.
 
fallout ranger said:
Anyone seen the FN Five seveN Pistol? That looks like a neat little gun, like a modern-day Tokarev.

Tell me you're not comparing a Belgian ergonomic, lightweight 5.7mm pistol to a russian 7.62mm brick.
 
fallout ranger said:
Not packing much energy though, which is the sad part.
not much energy? pfft...

with a gun with extremely light recoil and awesome accuracy potential, the shooting is about shotplacement, not brute force.

afterall, nearly all reported professional shooting incidents with a FiveseveN were reported to have ended with a single shot fired by police. but of course, this is greatly due to the fact that the people wielding it are specialists (SWAT, GIGN, SIE,...).
also, spec ops seem to like them too, in tandem with the P90 for urban operations and hostage rescue.

Mikael Grizzly said:
Tell me you're not comparing a Belgian ergonomic, lightweight 5.7mm pistol to a russian 7.62mm brick.
he did say modern day, so i forgive him. ;)

also, the ergonomics of the FiveseveN is a tad odd.
 
One hundred yards with a handgun isn't really all that hard. I can regularly ring the steel at 100 yards with my 1911, the steel being a man-hole cover. I can do it with my 87T (.22) as well. So getting there isn't that much of a problem. Having any energy left when you do is.

I made my points about the 5.7 some pages back. I don't like it all that much, and in my country, it's somewhat of a novelty cartridge. SuA can tell you all about the wonderful things the ever industrious Belgians can do with it. I'd rather have my M4 or my 1911. Then again, I'm old and slow and prefer the weapons I am accustomed to.
 
JohnnyEgo said:
One hundred yards with a handgun isn't really all that hard. I can regularly ring the steel at 100 yards with my 1911, the steel being a man-hole cover. I can do it with my 87T (.22) as well. So getting there isn't that much of a problem. Having any energy left when you do is.
still, the .45ACP suffers from rather steep bullet drop at those ranges. and grouping wont be much.
the 5.7 on the other hand has a very flat trajectory and does group well.
JohnnyEgo said:
I'd rather have my M4 or my 1911.
hey, don't compare rifles with pistols, goddamn it! :crazy: :wink:

and yeah, i LOVE the 1911 as well.

btw Johnny, did you ever try 1911's in 9mm? (yes i know, it's blasphemy)
i'm kinda looking into the P18-9, PXT LDA 9mm and the singlestack STI Trojan 9mm. most recurring problem is with feeding and locking the slide back after last round fired. i'm pretty worried about quality of the magazines.
 
Were are you all guys from? In my country it is illegal to own a firearm. - unless you are military, diplomat, politician or really really rich.
 
SuAside said:
still, the .45ACP suffers from rather steep bullet drop at those ranges. and grouping wont be much. the 5.7 on the other hand has a very flat trajectory and does group well.

Yeah, but it will still hurt.

I don't shoot for groups with pistols past 25 yards. Probably because I am not very good at it. I lack the eyesight and patience for it. However, I can keep all my shots on a dinner-sized paper plate at up to 75 yards standing still. Good enough for me. Shooting on the move reduces my effective range and accuracy quite a bit, though.

SuAside said:
btw Johnny, did you ever try 1911's in 9mm? (yes i know, it's blasphemy)
i'm kinda looking into the P18-9, PXT LDA 9mm and the singlestack STI Trojan 9mm. most recurring problem is with feeding and locking the slide back after last round fired. i'm pretty worried about quality of the magazines.

I'm not a hi-cap guy in 1911s, although STI & SVI both make nice guns. I have a personal bias against Para based on the large number of wide bodies that came into my shop for feeding issues a few years back.

I'm not against the 9mm 1911 in the least bit, although I would like to point out that God, er... Browning already created a fine handgun around the 9mm cartridge. My father owns a Kimber 1911 in 9mm and likes it quite a bit. I've shot it several times. It's comfortable and shoots well, but there are a lot of other 9mm handguns I like better, so I've never bought one myself.

I am currently eyeing the Sig X5 and an HK P9S as I approach tax refund time if the wife doesn't give me the veto. Word of advice - never teach a tempermental woman how to shoot. It adds a whole new dimension of fear to the relationship.
 
Blakut said:
Were are you all guys from? In my country it is illegal to own a firearm. - unless you are military, diplomat, politician or really really rich.
belgium

JohnnyEgo said:
I'm not a hi-cap guy in 1911s
neither am i, but getting a single stack would pretty much suck if i were to decide to do some IPSC with it. the average IPSC 9mm has like 16+ bullets, a singlestack has 9 or so?
JohnnyEgo said:
although STI & SVI both make nice guns.
yeah, i'm really tempted by a Trojan 5.0 (either in .45ACP or 9mm) since well, most 1911's here are in the same pricerange. a Kimber Custom II or a PO 14-45 cost as much as a Trojan 5.0 out here...

JohnnyEgo said:
I have a personal bias against Para based on the large number of wide bodies that came into my shop for feeding issues a few years back.
yeah, that worries me most... i've been reading really mixed reviews.

JohnnyEgo said:
I'm not against the 9mm 1911 in the least bit, although I would like to point out that God, er... Browning already created a fine handgun around the 9mm cartridge.
no worries it's already on my list. it's probably the handgun i'd pick for SHTF situations. there is no surplus ammo that survives the hammer of doom! a FN/Browning HP will bust any primer. :)

PS: the HP was more Saive's work than it was Browning's.

JohnnyEgo said:
I am currently eyeing the Sig X5 and an HK P9S as I approach tax refund time if the wife doesn't give me the veto.
a Sig P226 X-Five? yeah, they're AWESOME (and i'm not even a sig fan). the range i go to is also official Sig distributor. one of the range guns is an X-Five.

madness you say? not quite, a shitload of people already bought an X-Five after trying the club gun. pays for itself... still insanely expensive, like 2500 euros for the bells & whistles model. that's way above my paygrade. ;)

JohnnyEgo said:
Word of advice - never teach a tempermental woman how to shoot. It adds a whole new dimension of fear to the relationship.
haha!
 
and i also bought a Nagant 1895, produced in Tula, 1939.
and while it's not a hugely practical or powerful gun, it is mechanically very interesting.

the double action pull is rather harsh and you get a little triggerslap, but the single action pull is downright perfect.

clicky here

clicky here

clicky here

clicky here

edit: because the pictures were fucking up the forum.
 
SuAside said:
and i also bought a Nagant 1895, produced in Tula, 1939.
and while it's not a hugely practical or powerful gun, it is mechanically very interesting.

the double action pull is rather harsh and you get a little triggerslap, but the single action pull is downright perfect.

clicky here

clicky here

clicky here

clicky here

edit: because the pictures were fucking up the forum.
Hmm nice. Is that the type that the commisioners used during the war? The ones used mostly for neckshots?
 
Back
Top