My thoughts exactly. My opinion of Bethesda has never been exactly "high" but when they omit the stage of "beta testing" in program development there is something seriously wrong.MrBumble said:Did they even try the build before allowing people to download it ?
Too little too late, I think. Like in Oblivion...Ausir said:By the way, surprisinly, there actually is some moral ambiguity in The Pitt, not just good slaves vs. evil slavers.
Ausdoerrt said:I wonder if the Broken Steel will manage to not be, ahem, "broken" upon release.
Slaughter Manslaught said:![]()
Attack of the giant white-on-red evil exclamation points of darkness!
Do they ever? They have to do what they do best. Release broken software.UncannyGarlic said:Guess this shows that they didn't need the extra time to add polish and fix bugs.
Is it something like bad slaves vs good slavers?Ausir said:By the way, surprisinly, there actually is some moral ambiguity in The Pitt, not just good slaves vs. evil slavers.
I am not bitter. I am glad. I am glad that people can see here directly what happens when a company doesnt care either about a worked out design or well thought out concept and does not spend enough time to polish their products cause it has to be released since money is the most important value and not the satisfaction of the costumer.Lichbane said:I love this place. Whenever I'm feeling down and angry, I visit this place; it reminds me that there are people in the world who are more bitter and twisted than me.
Thanks guys!![]()
Crni Vuk said:I am not bitter. I am glad. I am glad that people can see here directly what happens when a company doesnt care either about a worked out design or well thought out concept and does not spend enough time to polish their products cause it has to be released since money is the most important value and not the satisfaction of the costumer.
UncannyGarlic said:... That sends us back to the design and planning stage, the stage that they rush through and thus loose boatloads of time later making mistakes and changing stuff that could have been worked out in a fraction of the time during the design phase.
Is it like in main F3 where you are given opportunities to side with asshole/dummy A or asshole/dummy B and their assorted stuptitude/ineptitude/belief system and any others flaws they might have in their plan? I tend to categorize that kind of thing as not so much "morally ambiguous" but more selecting which flawed group (and their mentality) you can stand more. It's really not impressive to me. The best quest that I did in F3 (maybe I missed one that did this better) was the oasis one. THAT was the correct way to do a quest. Each "camp" had their own reasons which were very reasonable and not idiotic and artificially inflated to cartoon levels where you want to tell everybody to fuck off as was the case for most quests in F3 for me. Thus in the Oasis quest the decision was yours to make about how YOU felt about the situation and whos notions YOU were more in line with. Not choosing between dipshit A or dipshit B.Ausir said:By the way, surprisinly, there actually is some moral ambiguity in The Pitt, not just good slaves vs. evil slavers.
Looks like more standard beth "choices" IMO. Forcing you to choose between 2 stupid options which are set up with unnecessary conflict to create an artificial conundrum. It's like saying which would you prefer "good" guys behaving like idiots or side with the "bad" guys? How bout neither? That would be my "choice".Ausir said:I haven't played it, only read some stuff about it, but this is the basic gist I got:
[spoiler:5c9698fb98]Side with slaves: They'll probably cut the child immune to the mutation open to see what's inside, desperate for an immediate cure.
Side with slavers: Kid will survive and Ashur intends to free the slaves once he's found a working cure (if he ever will).[/spoiler:5c9698fb98]
Brother None said:So bad slaves vs good slavers?
terebikun said:Isn't releasing buggy/broken content in keeping with the Fallout tradition? And you guys say that Bethesda doesn't "get it".
So bad slaves vs good slavers?