The Ultimate Movie Thread of Ultimate Destiny

Gonna review some movies I've seen recently.

Boyhood - Is it gimmicky? Yes. Was that gimmick impressive and interesting regardless? Yes. The film is ostensibly a coming-of-age story about the "boy" that the title is referring to, but the real stars were Ethan Hawke and Patricia Arquette. It's a very well made movie that could have easily been terrible in the wrong hands, but there's still no guarantee that you'll like it since ultimately it's true that it has no real plot. It's just a series of events, though I guess that's kind of the point. So basically I liked it but a lot of people find it boring, your mileage may vary.

The Imitation Game - Liked it when I watched it, but its flaws became more apparent the more I thought about it. It was also horribly historically inaccurate but in my opinion that's not something that should mar anyone's enjoyment of a film. Very obvious Oscar bait, primarily saved by Beneficial Cucumberpatch's unexpectedly solid performance. It was decent.

'71 - I would probably have enjoyed this more if I were Irish and/or had any understanding of this movie's historical context. As it stands I had no fucking idea what was going on half the time but it was still an interesting thriller. There wasn't enough character development to really make you feel anything for most of the characters and some of them have aim as bad as Stormtroopers but it was entertaining enough I guess. Decent flick if you like war movies.

It Follows - I've gotta be honest and admit that this one surprised me. I wasn't expecting it to be very good but I was wrong. Probably the best horror film made in the past decade or so that I've seen; nice cinematography, good soundtrack, interesting concept, and surprisingly thought-provoking to boot. Didn't rely on over the top gore or CGI to create horror like most films in the genre do these days either. It reminded me a lot of John Carpenter's Haloween, so if you liked that you'll probably like this. Good movie.
 
It Follows - I've gotta be honest and admit that this one surprised me. I wasn't expecting it to be very good but I was wrong. Probably the best horror film made in the past decade or so that I've seen; nice cinematography, good soundtrack, interesting concept, and surprisingly thought-provoking to boot. Didn't rely on over the top gore or CGI to create horror like most films in the genre do these days either. It reminded me a lot of John Carpenter's Haloween, so if you liked that you'll probably like this. Good movie.

I was curious of it, because it did indeed seem like a seemingly-bad movie turning-out-to-be-good. Dunno how I got that impression from it, don't even remember where I found out about it, but I wikied it briefly :D
 
Boyhood - Is it gimmicky? Yes. Was that gimmick impressive and interesting regardless? Yes. The film is ostensibly a coming-of-age story about the "boy" that the title is referring to, but the real stars were Ethan Hawke and Patricia Arquette. It's a very well made movie that could have easily been terrible in the wrong hands, but there's still no guarantee that you'll like it since ultimately it's true that it has no real plot. It's just a series of events, though I guess that's kind of the point. So basically I liked it but a lot of people find it boring, your mileage may vary.
Yep, that sounds like a good description of a Richard Linklater movie. I'm interested to see Boyhood, but not interested enough to go out of my way.

You might also like Before Sunrise, which I greatly appreciated. I didn't enjoy the sequel, Before Sunset, as much, and haven't seen the third and final installment, Before Midnight. The trilogy is all Ethan Hawke and Julie Delpy, and they're both good actors.

My favorite Linklater film is still probably Dazed and Confused. I find I enjoy rewatching it from time to time.
 
I rewatched Battle of the Gods (the DBZ movie), when I first watched it I really disliked it, but now I only merely dislike the final battle. I still mantain that it was a rather blandly animated and weightless fight, specially with the After effects balls of energy bit the movie is all good dumb fun before that (but only if youare a fan of DBZ) specially because in the Latin American version we got back the classic voice actors after they were all changed for that Crappy Kai remake. Bills/Beerus was a rather interesting character and one of Dragon Ball's mos original antagonist. Seeing Vegeta dancing to a cheesy tune with a Goofy smile and getting angry at someone hitting his wife was pretty funny too, and might actually make the whole movie worth it all by itself.

Pink haired Goku is a dumb design, and Mint Goku is a stupid design too, I hope Resurrection of F is at least a fun Nostalgia trip.
 
Talvisota (Finland, 1989) - Excellent war movie. Finnish troops are repelling Russian attack on their borderline in 1940. Trench warfare in cold winter weather, with very realistic extras instead of shitty modern CGI.
 
I'd never seen To Kill a Mockingbird before. The collector's edition bluray was on sale online for 10 euros. Best thing I ever bought on a whim. I checked the page right after. "This article is out of stock."
 
Last edited:
I put that documentary, and The Pervert's Guide to Cinema, on my to-watch list.

I also just saw Whiplash. And man, I get how it won 3 oscars. Stellarly put together film.
 
I really dig the practical effects JJ is going for. Going back to what Star Wars really is. But I'm skeptical, and I didn't dig the second trailer much.
 
I'm sure that, good or bad, JJ can make better movies than the prequels.
While that's certainly true, I'm not sure it's a good standard to use to judge the new movie.

I got wrapped up watching Taxi Driver again last night. So good. It had never occurred to me before, but upon reflection it's quite clear that...

...Travis dies in the shootout with Iris's pimps, and the last couple of minutes of the movie are something like a projection of his afterlife. The way the camera slows down and seems to float away from his body resting on the couch, and the way everything in the story wraps up neat and tidy - it's awesome. I was reading some analysis of the ending, and it also fits that Travis becomes his job, just like Wizard told him. He is the taxi driver.
 
I'm sure that, good or bad, JJ can make better movies than the prequels. He also has a huge boost in the nostalgia area for hiring the old actors.

Your avatar is awesome. I don't know who you are but you get upvotes for no reason from now on.
 
Made a gif out of part of this lovely style switcheroo tribute:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JXFqPzAFv8o

BladeRunner_zps5q50bnez.gif
 
It's interesting to see some of those memorable scenes in black and white. It emphasizes how strong Blade Runner's shot composition is generally, and how much it draws on classic 1930s and 1940s Noir for inspiration.

It looks better in color though, because the use of color in Blade Runner is also masterful.
 
I saw Avengers 2. It was ok.

A very convoluted story. Not in the complexity, but in the amount of characters. Ultron barely gets any screentime in the freaking age of ultron. The strength of the marvel movies so far has always been a lack of excess, a cohesion. The villain gets introduced, he has a clear goal, and some interesting banter and comedy and action fill it up to the climax. Perhaps this does follow such a structure, but not the clarity, the focus. Ultron is underdeveloped, the new characters are underdeveloped. . that was the problem. It started developing something and then dropped it for something new. And that's too bad, because excepting the Incredible Hulk, Iron Man 3 and kinda Thor, I liked all of em so far. I would definitely say the Avengers 1 is better, but I haven't seen 2 a second time yet. Still, very nice 'down-time' scenes for the avengers where they just hang around.
 
Last edited:
I too, saw Avengers: Age of Ultron.

I thought it was a very fun movie, it was kind of filler-ish except for
Vision and the Mind Gem.
but it didn't bother me, it was good filler, the enjoyable creamy kind.

It addressed pretty much all my issues with the first one and the action was very well done, with the team using powers together/interestingly, the characters were suprisingly well developed and they actually managed to make MCU Hawkeye cool. I enjoyed Ultron's failed attempts at trying to be menacing, where he ended up not being able to contain his emotional side, I think a lot of people expected some emotionless Skynet derivative, but that's not Ultron. Ultron is a robot with an emotional Human's mind and a hell of a lot of daddy issues, which I thought they conveyed well enough. His big evil plan was pretty weird too, but weird in a good way, I honestly didn't expect an
Eastern European City being elevated above the Earth with Anti-Grav tech and used as an artificial meteor to re-create a global extinction event
.

That Hulkbuster fight was very fun too, much better than I expected.

Overall, very fun movie that was kind of filler-ish in that it was just an Avenger's adventure with no colossal developments and Earth shattering changes/character deaths, it was almost like a Marvel Event comic brought to the silver screen. It didn't particularly grab me or become very memorable like Guardians of the Galaxy or The Winter Soldier, but I still enjoyed the experience and I thought it was a fun movie.

Apparently, the original version of the film was 3 1/2 hours long and it had to be chopped to pieces during development.

Overall, I'd give it a 7.8/10

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top